• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相信能够克服认知偏差。

Believing in Overcoming Cognitive Biases.

机构信息

Postdoctoral researcher at Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis.

Professor of Pediatrics and associate dean for research mentoring at Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2020 Sep 1;22(9):E773-778. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.773.

DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2020.773
PMID:33009773
Abstract

Like all humans, health professionals are subject to cognitive biases that can render diagnoses and treatment decisions vulnerable to error. Learning effective debiasing strategies and cultivating awareness of confirmation, anchoring, and outcomes biases and the affect heuristic, among others, and their effects on clinical decision making should be prioritized in all stages of education.

摘要

和所有人一样,健康专业人员也会受到认知偏差的影响,这可能会使诊断和治疗决策容易出错。在教育的各个阶段,都应优先学习有效的去偏策略,并提高对确认偏误、锚定效应、结果偏误和启发式判断等认知偏差,以及它们对临床决策的影响的认识。

相似文献

1
Believing in Overcoming Cognitive Biases.相信能够克服认知偏差。
AMA J Ethics. 2020 Sep 1;22(9):E773-778. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.773.
2
Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy.医学决策中的认知偏差与启发式方法:运用系统检索策略的批判性综述
Med Decis Making. 2015 May;35(4):539-57. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14547740. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
3
Clinical decision-making: heuristics and cognitive biases for the ophthalmologist.临床决策:眼科医生的启发法与认知偏差
Surv Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan-Feb;63(1):119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
4
Clinical decision making in physical therapy - Exploring the 'heuristic' in clinical practice.物理治疗中的临床决策——探索临床实践中的“启发法”
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022 Dec;62:102674. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102674. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
5
Is clinical decision making in stepped-care psychological services influenced by heuristics and biases?阶梯式心理服务中的临床决策是否受启发式和偏差的影响?
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2023 Jul;51(4):362-373. doi: 10.1017/S1352465823000115. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
6
How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions.启发式和认知偏差如何影响疫苗接种决策。
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Nov 20;36Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e00136620. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00136620. eCollection 2020.
7
Quantifying Heuristic Bias: Anchoring, Availability, and Representativeness.量化启发式偏差:锚定、可得性和代表性。
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Jan-Mar;30(1):67-75. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1332631. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
8
Cognitive Biases in Orthopaedic Surgery.骨科手术中的认知偏差。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Jul 15;29(14):624-633. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00620.
9
Decision Making: Healthy Heuristics and Betraying Biases.决策制定:健康启发式与偏见背叛
Crit Care Clin. 2022 Jan;38(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2021.07.002.
10
Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing.认知去偏倚 1:偏倚的起源和去偏倚理论。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii58-ii64. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001712. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Concorde Syndrome in the Treatment of People with Cancer: Validation of a Measurement Instrument.癌症患者治疗中的协和综合征:一种测量工具的验证
Int J Behav Med. 2025 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s12529-025-10392-9.
2
Cognitive Errors and Debiasing.认知错误与去偏
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 31;10(3):L1-L6. doi: 10.21980/J84W96. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Behavioural insights in the underuse of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in heart failure: a pilot survey on incentive perceptions among referring cardiologists.
心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗使用不足的行为洞察:关于转诊心脏病专家激励认知的一项初步调查
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jul 18;15(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00657-0.
4
Navigating the patient-provider relationship during severe illness with lessons from a qualitative perspective of calciphylaxis.从钙过敏的定性角度汲取经验,在重症期间处理医患关系。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23515. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09116-6.
5
Preparing for the Next Deadly Pandemic: What Did COVID-19 Try to Teach Us?为下一场致命大流行做准备:新冠疫情试图教会我们什么?
Mo Med. 2025 Mar-Apr;122(2):90-93.
6
The Relationship Between Intolerance of Uncertainty and Treatment Adherence: The Moderating Effect of Self-Compassion on the Chain Mediation Model.不确定性不耐受与治疗依从性之间的关系:自我同情在链式中介模型中的调节作用。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Mar 20;19:699-714. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S507872. eCollection 2025.
7
Exploring the practice principles and beliefs of trans-care providers working with trans and detrans youth: A survey-based analysis.探索为跨性别和非跨性别青年提供护理的医护人员的实践原则和信念:基于调查的分析。
Int J Transgend Health. 2024 Jul 25;26(1):180-197. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2024.2382782. eCollection 2025.
8
A qualitative study of how clinicians reach agreement in perioperative pathway development: the Consensus Model for Standardising Healthcare.关于临床医生如何在围手术期路径开发中达成共识的定性研究:医疗保健标准化共识模型
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Feb 4;6(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00699-9.
9
Mitigating Cognitive Biases in Clinical Decision-Making Through Multi-Agent Conversations Using Large Language Models: Simulation Study.通过使用大型语言模型进行多代理对话来减轻临床决策中的认知偏差:模拟研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 19;26:e59439. doi: 10.2196/59439.
10
Exploring strategies to improve clinical decision making in a chiropractic office: a case series.探索改善整脊诊所临床决策的策略:病例系列
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2024 Aug;68(2):113-121.