Costa-I-Font Joan, Miler-Raicu Georgiana, Arbelo Elena, Casado-Arroyo Ruben, Sami Aya, Tee Eric Wei Seong, Hazel Joseph, Roten Laurent, Reichlin Tobias, Burri Haran, Albouaini Khaled, Kozhuharov Nikola
London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 20, Bern, 3010, Switzerland.
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jul 18;15(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00657-0.
Heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalisation in patients over 50, significantly impacting both quality of life and survival. Despite the well-established benefits of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT), its utilisation in clinical practice remains suboptimal. Traditional incentives, have shown limited effectiveness in increasing CRT referrals. This manuscript explores how behavioural economics can offer a novel framework for improving CRT uptake by leveraging behavioural incentives, particularly choice architecture and social incentives, to influence physician referral patterns.
We underscore key concepts of behavioural economics, including choice architecture (nudges, reference points, sludges), cognitive biases (status quo bias, overconfidence bias, availability bias), and social incentives, which are applied in designing incentives to promote CRT referrals. A survey was conducted with 51 physicians from six European countries, including electrophysiologists, heart failure specialists, and general cardiologists, recruited through cardiology networks and personal contacts. Participants rated their perceptions of five incentive strategies using a Likert scale (1-5). Behavioural incentives, such as peer comparison through league tables (social incentive) and decision prompts in electronic health records (choice architecture nudge), were perceived as more effective than traditional financial incentives, with a median Likert score of 4.0 [IQR 3.0-5.0] versus 2.5 [IQR 1.5-3.0] for traditional incentives (p < 0.001).
These findings suggest that interventions drawing on behavioural economics, particularly those utilising social incentives and choice architecture redesign, may offer more effective to increasing CRT referrals than traditional incentives. Such interventions could enhance CRT uptake and outcomes for heart failure patients.
心力衰竭是50岁以上患者住院的主要原因,对生活质量和生存率均有重大影响。尽管心脏再同步治疗(CRT)已被证实具有诸多益处,但其在临床实践中的应用仍不尽人意。传统激励措施在增加CRT转诊方面效果有限。本文探讨行为经济学如何通过利用行为激励因素,特别是选择架构和社会激励因素,为改善CRT的采用率提供一个新框架,以影响医生的转诊模式。
我们强调了行为经济学的关键概念,包括选择架构(助推、参考点、阻碍)、认知偏差(现状偏差、过度自信偏差、可得性偏差)和社会激励因素,这些因素被应用于设计促进CRT转诊的激励措施。通过心脏病学网络和个人联系,对来自六个欧洲国家的51名医生进行了调查,其中包括电生理学家、心力衰竭专家和普通心脏病专家。参与者使用李克特量表(1-5)对五种激励策略的看法进行评分。行为激励措施,如通过排行榜进行同行比较(社会激励)和电子健康记录中的决策提示(选择架构助推),被认为比传统的经济激励措施更有效,李克特评分中位数分别为4.0[四分位间距3.0-5.0]和2.5[四分位间距1.5-3.0](p<0.001)。
这些发现表明,借鉴行为经济学的干预措施,特别是那些利用社会激励因素和重新设计选择架构的措施,可能比传统激励措施在增加CRT转诊方面更有效。此类干预措施可提高心力衰竭患者对CRT的采用率及治疗效果。