School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Dec;76(12):3293-3306. doi: 10.1111/jan.14587. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
To assess the effects of upright positions on maternal outcomes for women without epidural analgesia in comparison with recumbent positions during the second stage of labour.
Upright positions have many physiological advantages. The underlying benefits and risks of upright positions during the second stage of labour have been reported in many studies but the results are divergent.
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and ProQuest databases were systematically searched from inception to 17 June 2019.
We conducted the quality appraisal using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and performed meta-analyses using the Review Manager 5.3 software. The primary outcomes were instrumental vaginal delivery and the duration of the second stage of labour.
Overall, 12 studies including 4,314 women were included. Upright positions significantly decreased the rate of instrumental vaginal delivery (risk ratio [RR] = 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.93), shortened the active pushing phase (mean difference [MD] = -8.16 min, 95% CI -16.29 to -0.02), decreased the rate of severe perineal trauma (RR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.87) and episiotomy (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.92), but significantly increased the rate of second-degree perineal trauma (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.10-1.90). However, there was no significant difference in the duration of the second stage of labour or postpartum haemorrhage.
Upright positions are beneficial for improving maternal outcomes. Several results should be considered with caution. Researchers need to clarify the definition of upright positions and conduct large, robust studies in the future to provide stronger evidence.
This meta-analysis explores a crucial issue in intrapartum care and clarifies the benefits and possible risks of upright positions in the second stage of labour. Midwives and obstetricians are encouraged to apply upright positions depending on women's preferences and labour progress but should take measures to prevent perineal trauma.
评估在第二产程中与卧位相比,直立位对未接受硬膜外镇痛的产妇结局的影响。
直立位有许多生理优势。许多研究已经报道了第二产程中直立位的潜在益处和风险,但结果存在差异。
随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
从创建到 2019 年 6 月 17 日,系统地检索了 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL 和 ProQuest 数据库。
我们使用 Cochrane 协作组的工具进行质量评估,并使用 Review Manager 5.3 软件进行荟萃分析。主要结局是器械性阴道分娩和第二产程的持续时间。
共有 12 项研究,包括 4314 名女性,符合纳入标准。直立位显著降低了器械性阴道分娩的发生率(风险比 [RR] = 0.74,95% CI 0.59-0.93),缩短了主动分娩阶段(平均差值 [MD] = -8.16 分钟,95% CI -16.29 至 -0.02),降低了严重会阴创伤的发生率(RR = 0.35,95% CI 0.14-0.87)和会阴切开术(RR = 0.52,95% CI 0.29-0.92),但显著增加了二度会阴创伤的发生率(RR = 1.45,95% CI 1.10-1.90)。然而,第二产程和产后出血的持续时间没有显著差异。
直立位有利于改善产妇结局。有几个结果应谨慎考虑。研究人员需要澄清直立位的定义,并在未来进行大型、稳健的研究,以提供更强有力的证据。
本荟萃分析探讨了分娩过程中的一个关键问题,并阐明了第二产程中直立位的益处和可能的风险。鼓励助产士和产科医生根据妇女的偏好和分娩进展应用直立位,但应采取措施预防会阴创伤。