Janež Jurij, Stupan Urban, Norčič Gregor
University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Zaloška cesta 7, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia; University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Vrazov trg 2, 1104, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Zaloška cesta 7, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia; University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Vrazov trg 2, 1104, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;76:41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.060. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
Adult perineal impalement injuries are uncommon and notorious for their complex injury pattern and risk of massive pelvic bleeding. They present a challenge for the treating physician as there is no consensus about the optimal treatment in the existing literature. In most cases patients need operative intervention.
In this article the authors present a case report of a 63-year old man with an impalement injury in the left gluteus, who was managed conservatively.
With the recent trends towards conservative management of abdominal penetrating trauma, increased morbidity and costs associated with nontherapeutic laparotomy, conservative management of impalement injuries in hemodynamically stable patients should be considered. Accurate determination of the impaling object trajectory path is vital for the decision and aids to answer two important questions: Did the impaling object enter the peritoneal, retroperitoneal or pelvic cavity? Is there an injury that will require an operation?
Abdominoperineal impalement injuries have high mortality, but those patients, who manage to reach hospital alive, can sometimes be manages conservatively, as shown in our case report.
成人会阴穿刺伤并不常见,因其损伤模式复杂且有大量盆腔出血的风险而声名狼藉。对于治疗医生来说,这是一个挑战,因为现有文献中对于最佳治疗方法尚无共识。在大多数情况下,患者需要手术干预。
在本文中,作者呈现了一例63岁男性左臀穿刺伤的病例报告,该患者接受了保守治疗。
随着近期腹部穿透伤保守治疗的趋势、非治疗性剖腹术相关的发病率增加和成本上升,对于血流动力学稳定的穿刺伤患者,应考虑保守治疗。准确确定穿刺物体的轨迹路径对于决策至关重要,并有助于回答两个重要问题:穿刺物体是否进入了腹腔、腹膜后腔或盆腔?是否存在需要手术的损伤?
腹部会阴穿刺伤死亡率很高,但如我们的病例报告所示,那些成功活着到达医院的患者有时可以接受保守治疗。