Suppr超能文献

压缩缝线联合房内注气与热角膜成形术治疗急性角膜水肿:前瞻性随机试验。

Compression sutures combined with intracameral air injection versus thermokeratoplasty for acute corneal hydrops: a prospective-randomised trial.

机构信息

Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou, China.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;105(12):1645-1650. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316414. Epub 2020 Oct 3.

Abstract

AIMS

To compare the efficacy of compression sutures combined with intracameral air injection (CSAI) and thermokeratoplasty (TKP) for the management of acute corneal hydrops in keratoconus.

METHODS

In this multi-centre randomised clinical trial, 20 patients with keratoconus (20 eyes) with acute corneal hydrops were enrolled and randomised to receive either CSAI or TKP and followed-up for a period of 6 months.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient demographics, severity of corneal hydrops and preoperative duration of symptoms between the two groups. In both groups, corneal oedema resolved within 2 weeks. The maximum thickness of the corneal scars following CSAI and TKP was not significantly different. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was superior in the CSAI group at 6-month follow-up (CSAI vs TKP, 0.52 (0.37, 0.85) vs 0.96 (0.70, 1.34) LogMAR, p=0.042). CSAI resulted in greater corneal endothelial cell density (CSAI vs TKP, 2677.8±326.7 vs 1955.3±298.1 cells/mm, p<0.001) and flatter corneal curvature (CSAI vs TKP: mean keratometry value, 52.13±4.92 vs 63.51±5.83D, p<0.001; maximum keratometry value, 65.21±7.42 vs 77.13±12.01D, p=0.016) at the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Although both CSAI and TKP resulted in resolution of acute corneal hydrops in keratoconus, CSAI was associated with superior clinical outcomes in this study.

CHINESE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR-IOR-17013764.

摘要

目的

比较压迫缝线联合房内注气(CSAI)与热角膜成形术(TKP)治疗圆锥角膜急性角膜水肿的疗效。

方法

在这项多中心随机临床试验中,纳入 20 例(20 只眼)急性角膜水肿的圆锥角膜患者,随机分为 CSAI 组或 TKP 组,并随访 6 个月。

结果

两组患者的人口统计学特征、角膜水肿严重程度和术前症状持续时间均无显著差异。两组患者的角膜水肿均在 2 周内消退。CSA 组和 TKP 组角膜瘢痕的最大厚度无显著差异。CSAI 组在 6 个月随访时最佳矫正视力更高(CSAI 组 vs TKP 组,0.52(0.37,0.85) vs 0.96(0.70,1.34)LogMAR,p=0.042)。CSAI 导致更高的角膜内皮细胞密度(CSAI 组 vs TKP 组,2677.8±326.7 个/mm2 vs 1955.3±298.1 个/mm2,p<0.001)和更平坦的角膜曲率(CSAI 组 vs TKP 组:平均角膜曲率值,52.13±4.92 vs 63.51±5.83D,p<0.001;最大角膜曲率值,65.21±7.42 vs 77.13±12.01D,p=0.016)。

结论

虽然 CSAI 和 TKP 均能使圆锥角膜的急性角膜水肿消退,但在本研究中 CSAI 与更好的临床结局相关。

中国临床试验注册中心注册号

ChiCTR-IOR-17013764。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验