Department of Philosophy, School of the Humanities, Center for Bioethics, Huazhong University of Bioethics, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Institute of Philosophy/Center for Applied Ethics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Center for Bioethics, Huazhong University of Bioethics, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2020 Nov;67(6):880-891. doi: 10.1002/bab.2032. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
This paper focuses on the ethical and regulatory issues raised by gene editing. In the introduction of this paper, authors provide the background where the ethical and regulatory issues by gene editing have been raised including the scientific dimension of gene-editing techniques. In the second part of the paper, the authors focus on ethical issues in human gene editing with the start of Huang Junjiu case and He Jiankui case. Here, the authors discuss the criteria for evaluating action, general ethical issues in gene editing, and try to answer two crucial questions: is it ethically justifiable to use human embryo in ex vivo genome editing study and is it ethically justifiable to perform heritable human genome editing? In answering the second question, the authors discuss the arguments against and for heritable human genome editing, methodological problem, and the building of an ethical framework for heritable human genome editing. In the third part of the paper, the authors focus on regulatory issues in gene editing including proactionary approach versus ethically thinking ahead approach, self-regulation versus top-down regulation, transparency versus confidentiality, and education versus punishment.
本文聚焦于基因编辑所引发的伦理和监管问题。在本文引言部分,作者提供了引出基因编辑的伦理和监管问题的背景,包括基因编辑技术的科学维度。在本文第二部分,作者以黄军就案和贺建奎案为起点,聚焦人类基因编辑中的伦理问题。在此,作者讨论了评价行动的标准、基因编辑中的一般伦理问题,并试图回答两个关键问题:在体外基因组编辑研究中使用人类胚胎在伦理上是否合理,以及进行可遗传的人类基因组编辑在伦理上是否合理?在回答第二个问题时,作者讨论了反对和支持可遗传的人类基因组编辑的论点、方法学问题,以及为可遗传的人类基因组编辑构建伦理框架。在本文第三部分,作者聚焦于基因编辑中的监管问题,包括前瞻性方法与前瞻性思考、自我监管与自上而下的监管、透明度与保密性、以及教育与惩罚。