Suppr超能文献

三所药学院校学生的求知好奇心探索性评估。

An Exploratory Assessment of Epistemic Curiosity in Students at Three Doctor of Pharmacy Programs.

机构信息

Sullivan University, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Louisville, Kentucky.

Associate Editor, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Arlington, Virginia.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):ajpe7970. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7970.

Abstract

To determine the level of epistemic curiosity in a sample of student pharmacists from three Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) programs as well as any differences in epistemic curiosity levels that exist between programs and with regard to professional year. Litman's Epistemic Curiosity Scale (ECS) was administered to student pharmacists at three different PharmD programs. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and overall mean ECS scores as well as mean scores on epistemic curiosity motivated by intellectual interest (I-type) and informational deprivation (D-type) were compared among student pharmacists at the three institutions using analysis of variance. Reliability analyses were also performed on the data. A total of 569 out of 1143 eligible students responded to the survey, for an overall response rate of 49.8%. The mean overall ECS score was 27.6 (SD=4.9). Mean I-type epistemic curiosity was 14.9 (SD=2.8) overall, but was statistically different among the schools. Mean D-type epistemic curiosity was 12.7 (SD=3.2) overall, but was statistically similar among the programs. Overall, the data demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of .81. This study was the first to characterize epistemic curiosity in student pharmacists and included data from multiple years and multiple programs. Future analyses should investigate associations between epistemic curiosity and other factors of interest to help elucidate how better understanding epistemic curiosity or enhancing it in student pharmacists may help facilitate student success.

摘要

目的

调查并比较三个药学博士(PharmD)项目的学生药剂师样本的认识好奇心水平,以及项目之间和专业年级之间的认识好奇心水平差异。 采用 Litman 的认识好奇心量表(ECS)对三个不同 PharmD 项目的学生药剂师进行评估。计算描述性统计数据,并使用方差分析比较三个机构的学生药剂师的总体 ECS 评分以及对智力兴趣(I 型)和信息剥夺(D 型)激发的认识好奇心的平均得分。还对数据进行了可靠性分析。 共有 1143 名符合条件的学生中有 569 名回应了调查,总体回应率为 49.8%。总体 ECS 得分平均值为 27.6(SD=4.9)。总体而言,I 型认识好奇心平均为 14.9(SD=2.8),但在学校之间存在统计学差异。总体而言,D 型认识好奇心平均为 12.7(SD=3.2),但在项目之间统计学上相似。总体而言,数据表现出良好的内部一致性,Cronbach's alpha 为.81。 这项研究首次描述了学生药剂师的认识好奇心,并包含了来自多年和多个项目的数据。未来的分析应研究认识好奇心与其他感兴趣因素之间的关联,以帮助阐明更好地理解学生药剂师的认识好奇心或增强其认识好奇心如何帮助促进学生成功。

相似文献

3
We should pay more attention to student curiosity.我们应该更加关注学生的好奇心。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Jul;11(7):651-654. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
8
Prevalence of phubbing by student pharmacists at two colleges of pharmacy.两所药学院学生药剂师低头族的患病率。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022 Apr;14(4):425-431. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Curricular Hoarding.课程囤积。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):847714. doi: 10.5688/ajpe847714.
2
We should pay more attention to student curiosity.我们应该更加关注学生的好奇心。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Jul;11(7):651-654. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
6
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
9
When I say … epistemic curiosity.当我说……认知好奇心。
Med Educ. 2014 Feb;48(2):113-4. doi: 10.1111/medu.12272.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验