• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

领导-成员交换促进有益行为并预防有害的工作场所行为:组织认同作为纽带。

Leader-Member Exchange Fosters Beneficial and Prevents Detrimental Workplace Behavior: Organizational Identification as the Linking Pin.

作者信息

Götz Martin, Donzallaz Michelle, Jonas Klaus

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 18;11:1788. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01788. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01788
PMID:33013499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7461862/
Abstract

Discretionary behaviors, such as counterproductive work behavior (CWB) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), directly refer to an organization's normative expectations. As such, employees engaging in these behaviors violate or exceed organizational norms, respectively. An employee's relationship quality with his or her supervisor [i.e., leader-member exchange (LMX)] has been found to be a prominent antecedent of employees' workplace behavior. However, the actual mechanisms that link LMX and discretionary behaviors (i.e., CWB and OCB) are not yet well understood. Integrating social exchange as well as the social identity theory, we present an employee's organizational identification (OI) as a mechanism that sheds light on why LMX leads to employees' subsequent discretionary behavior. Across four empirical studies employing complementary study designs, we demonstrate that LMX is positively associated with OI, which, in turn, curbs CWB and fosters OCB. Specifically, this pattern of findings is consistent across (1) a cross-sectional study with 188 Swiss employees, (2) a time-lagged study with 502 Swiss employees, (3) an online recall experiment with 131 US participants, and (4) an online vignette experiment with 139 US participants. In sum, we present an integrative theoretical model and respective empirical support to shed light on OI as a pivotal mechanism that can explain why the relationship quality with one's supervisor can simultaneously serve as a deterrent for CWB and foster OCB.

摘要

自发行为,如反生产工作行为(CWB)和组织公民行为(OCB),直接涉及组织的规范性期望。因此,从事这些行为的员工分别违反或超越了组织规范。员工与其上级的关系质量[即领导成员交换(LMX)]已被发现是员工工作场所行为的一个重要前因。然而,将LMX与自发行为(即CWB和OCB)联系起来的实际机制尚未得到很好的理解。综合社会交换理论和社会认同理论,我们提出员工的组织认同(OI)作为一种机制,来解释为什么LMX会导致员工随后的自发行为。通过四项采用互补研究设计的实证研究,我们证明LMX与OI呈正相关,而OI反过来又抑制CWB并促进OCB。具体而言,这一研究结果模式在以下四项研究中是一致的:(1)对188名瑞士员工的横断面研究;(2)对502名瑞士员工的时间滞后研究;(3)对131名美国参与者的在线回忆实验;(4)对139名美国参与者的在线 vignette 实验。总之,我们提出了一个综合理论模型和相应的实证支持,以阐明OI作为一个关键机制,能够解释为什么与上级的关系质量既能同时抑制CWB,又能促进OCB。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ab/7461862/2d7bfe45057c/fpsyg-11-01788-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ab/7461862/64ea440837e2/fpsyg-11-01788-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ab/7461862/a517eb2e9f2c/fpsyg-11-01788-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ab/7461862/2d7bfe45057c/fpsyg-11-01788-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ab/7461862/64ea440837e2/fpsyg-11-01788-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ab/7461862/a517eb2e9f2c/fpsyg-11-01788-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ab/7461862/2d7bfe45057c/fpsyg-11-01788-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Leader-Member Exchange Fosters Beneficial and Prevents Detrimental Workplace Behavior: Organizational Identification as the Linking Pin.领导-成员交换促进有益行为并预防有害的工作场所行为:组织认同作为纽带。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 18;11:1788. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01788. eCollection 2020.
2
Walking the Tightrope: Counterproductive Work Behavior as Compensation for Citizenship Demands.走钢丝:反生产工作行为作为对公民绩效要求的补偿
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 3;7:1530. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01530. eCollection 2016.
3
The impact of leader member exchange quality and differentiation on counterproductive and citizenship behavior in health care teams.领导-成员交换质量和差异化对医疗团队中反生产和公民行为的影响。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2024;49(2):86-93. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000394. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
4
Linking Self-Control to Voluntary Behaviors at Workplace: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction.将自我控制与工作场所的自愿行为联系起来:工作满意度的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 23;12:530297. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.530297. eCollection 2021.
5
Counterproductive Work Behavior and Organizational Citizenship Behavior.反生产工作行为与组织公民行为
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2020 Dec 10;16(4):321-328. doi: 10.5709/acp-0306-9. eCollection 2020.
6
Why and When Do Good Soldiers Behave Unethically? Introducing Conservation of Resources Theory to Explain the Curvilinear Effects of Organizational Citizenship Behavior.优秀士兵为何以及何时会做出不道德行为?引入资源守恒理论来解释组织公民行为的曲线效应。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 28;12:619657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619657. eCollection 2021.
7
Impact of perceived supervisor support and leader-member exchange on employees' intention to leave in public sector museums: A parallel mediation approach.感知到的上级支持和领导成员交换对公共部门博物馆员工离职意愿的影响:一种平行中介方法。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 3;14:1131896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131896. eCollection 2023.
8
Envy and Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Moderation Role of Leadership in Public and Private Organizations.嫉妒与反生产工作行为:公共和私营组织中领导的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 10;15(7):1455. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071455.
9
Giving what they want: How congruence between expected feedback quality and delivered feedback quality influences leader-member exchange and job performance.给予他们想要的:预期反馈质量与实际提供的反馈质量之间的一致性如何影响领导-成员交换关系和工作绩效。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 15;14:1115861. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1115861. eCollection 2023.
10
The brief introduction to organizational citizenship behaviors and counterproductive work behaviors: a literature review.组织公民行为与反生产工作行为简介:文献综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 13;14:1181930. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181930. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Leader ethical voice and subordinate job performance: the chain mediating role of subordinate identification with leader and leader-member exchange.领导者道德声音与下属工作绩效:下属对领导者的认同和领导-成员交换的链式中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 19;15:1340769. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1340769. eCollection 2024.
2
Impact of perceived supervisor support and leader-member exchange on employees' intention to leave in public sector museums: A parallel mediation approach.感知到的上级支持和领导成员交换对公共部门博物馆员工离职意愿的影响:一种平行中介方法。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 3;14:1131896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131896. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
An eye for an eye? A meta-analysis of negative reciprocity in organizations.以眼还眼?组织中消极互惠关系的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Sep;104(9):1117-1143. doi: 10.1037/apl0000396. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
2
Is the employee-organization relationship dying or thriving? A temporal meta-analysis.员工-组织关系是走向消亡还是蓬勃发展?一项时间性元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Aug;104(8):1036-1057. doi: 10.1037/apl0000390. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
3
An Evaluation of Amazon's Mechanical Turk, Its Rapid Rise, and Its Effective Use.亚马逊土耳其机器人的评估、快速崛起及其有效应用。
Defensive Silence, Defensive Voice, Knowledge Hiding, and Counterproductive Work Behavior Through the Lens of Stimulus-Organism-Response.
基于刺激-机体-反应视角的防御性沉默、防御性发声、知识隐藏与反生产工作行为
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 18;13:822008. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822008. eCollection 2022.
4
When breaking the rule becomes necessary: The impact of leader-member exchange quality on nurses pro-social rule-breaking.当打破规则成为必要时:领导成员交换质量对护士亲社会违规行为的影响
Nurs Open. 2022 Sep;9(5):2289-2303. doi: 10.1002/nop2.979. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
5
In Leaders We Trust, or Should We? Supervisors' Dark Triad Personality Traits and Ratings of Team Performance and Innovation.我们信任领导,还是应该如此?管理者的黑暗三性格特质与团队绩效及创新评级
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 14;12:650172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650172. eCollection 2021.
6
The Role of Change in the Relationships Between Leader-Member Exchange/Coworker Exchange and Newcomer Performance: A Latent Growth Modeling Approach.领导-成员交换/同事交换与新员工绩效关系中变化的作用:一种潜在增长建模方法。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 13;12:600712. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.600712. eCollection 2021.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;13(2):149-154. doi: 10.1177/1745691617706516.
4
Cross-Sectional Analysis of Longitudinal Mediation Processes.横断面分析纵向中介过程。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 May-Jun;53(3):375-402. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1454822. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
5
An alternative to post hoc model modification in confirmatory factor analysis: The Bayesian lasso.在验证性因子分析中替代事后模型修正的方法:贝叶斯套索。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Dec;22(4):687-704. doi: 10.1037/met0000112.
6
Not all differentiation is the same: Examining the moderating effects of leader-member exchange (LMX) configurations.并非所有的差异化都是相同的:考察领导-成员交换(LMX)配置的调节效应。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 May;103(5):478-495. doi: 10.1037/apl0000262. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
7
Investigating measurement equivalence of visual analogue scales and Likert-type scales in Internet-based personality questionnaires.研究基于互联网的人格问卷中视觉模拟量表和李克特量表的测量等效性。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Dec;49(6):2173-2181. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0850-x.
8
Design approaches to experimental mediation.实验性中介的设计方法。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2016 Sep;66:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
9
Are all "research fields" equal? Rethinking practice for the use of data from crowdsourcing market places.所有“研究领域”都一样吗?重新思考众包市场数据的使用实践。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1333-1342. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0789-y.
10
The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions.在网络上进行实验的陷阱:无人关注的选择性损耗如何导致令人惊讶(但错误)的研究结论。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Oct;111(4):493-504. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000056. Epub 2016 Jun 13.