• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知和个性方面的个体差异能否预测大规模开放在线课程(MOOCs)中的检索练习活动?

Do Individual Differences in Cognition and Personality Predict Retrieval Practice Activities on MOOCs?

作者信息

Fellman Daniel, Lincke Alisa, Jonsson Bert

机构信息

Department of Applied Educational Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 18;11:2076. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02076. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02076
PMID:33013528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7461909/
Abstract

Online quizzes building upon the principles of retrieval practice can have beneficial effects on learning, especially long-term retention. However, it is unexplored how interindividual differences in relevant background characteristics relate to retrieval practice activities in e-learning. Thus, this study sought to probe for this research question on a massive open online course (MOOC) platform where students have the optional possibility to quiz themselves on the to-be-learned materials. Altogether 105 students were assessed with a cognitive task tapping on reasoning, and two self-assessed personality measures capturing need for cognition (NFC), and grittiness (GRIT-S). Between-group analyses revealed that cognitively high performing individuals were more likely to use the optional quizzes on the platform. Moreover, within-group analyses ( = 56) including those students using the optional quizzes on the platform showed that reasoning significantly predicted quiz performance, and quiz processing speed. NFC and GRIT-S were unrelated to each of the aforementioned retrieval practice activities.

摘要

基于检索练习原则的在线测验对学习有有益影响,尤其是对长期记忆。然而,相关背景特征的个体差异与电子学习中的检索练习活动之间的关系尚未得到探索。因此,本研究试图在大规模开放在线课程(MOOC)平台上探究这个研究问题,在该平台上学生可以选择对所学材料进行自我测验。总共105名学生接受了一项测试推理能力的认知任务评估,以及两项自我评估的人格测量,以测量认知需求(NFC)和坚毅性(GRIT-S)。组间分析表明,认知表现高的个体更有可能使用平台上的可选测验。此外,在包括那些使用平台上可选测验的学生在内的组内分析(n = 56)中,推理能力显著预测了测验成绩和测验处理速度。NFC和GRIT-S与上述任何一项检索练习活动均无关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba3/7461909/2048cb909a8c/fpsyg-11-02076-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba3/7461909/2048cb909a8c/fpsyg-11-02076-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba3/7461909/2048cb909a8c/fpsyg-11-02076-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Do Individual Differences in Cognition and Personality Predict Retrieval Practice Activities on MOOCs?认知和个性方面的个体差异能否预测大规模开放在线课程(MOOCs)中的检索练习活动?
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 18;11:2076. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02076. eCollection 2020.
2
Who will pass? Analyzing learner behaviors in MOOCs.谁会通过?分析大规模开放在线课程中的学习者行为。
Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2016;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41039-016-0033-5. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
3
Retrieval Practice Is Effective Regardless of Self-Reported - Behavioral and Brain Imaging Evidence.无论自我报告如何,检索练习都是有效的——行为和脑成像证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 10;12:797395. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.797395. eCollection 2021.
4
The integration of an anatomy massive open online course (MOOC) into a medical anatomy curriculum.将解剖学大规模开放在线课程(MOOC)融入医学解剖学课程体系。
Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Jan;10(1):53-67. doi: 10.1002/ase.1625. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
5
Online feedback assessments in physiology: effects on students' learning experiences and outcomes.在线反馈评估在生理学中的应用:对学生学习体验和成果的影响。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2013 Jun;37(2):192-200. doi: 10.1152/advan.00092.2012.
6
Medical student web-based formative assessment tool for renal pathology.用于肾脏病理学的医学生基于网络的形成性评估工具。
Med Educ Online. 2015 Mar 31;20:26765. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.26765. eCollection 2015.
7
Elderly Learners and Massive Open Online Courses: A Review.老年学习者与大规模开放在线课程:综述
Interact J Med Res. 2016 Jan 7;5(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.4937.
8
Transformation of a face-to-face workshop into a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC): A design and development case.将面对面工作坊转变为大规模开放在线课程(MOOC):一个设计与开发案例。
J Form Des Learn. 2019 Dec;3(2):97-110. doi: 10.1007/s41686-019-00037-y. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
9
Massive open online courses in U.S. healthcare education: Practical considerations and lessons learned from implementation.美国医疗保健教育中的大规模在线开放课程:实际考量与实施经验教训
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Jun;10(6):736-743. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
10
Interleaving Retrieval Practice Promotes Science Learning.交错检索练习促进科学学习。
Psychol Sci. 2022 May;33(5):782-788. doi: 10.1177/09567976211057507. Epub 2022 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of AI Precision Education Strategy for Small Private Online Courses.小型私立在线课程的人工智能精准教育策略分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 10;12:749629. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.749629. eCollection 2021.
2
Massive Open Online Courses Combined with Flipped Classroom: An Approach to Promote Training of Resident Physicians in Rheumatology.大规模开放在线课程与翻转课堂相结合:一种促进风湿科住院医师培训的方法
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Aug 11;14:4453-4457. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S325437. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Time on task matters most in video game expertise.在视频游戏专长中,花在任务上的时间最为重要。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 29;13(10):e0206555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206555. eCollection 2018.
2
The benefits of retrieval practice depend on item difficulty and intelligence.检索练习的益处取决于项目难度和智力水平。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Sep;44(9):1474-1486. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000486. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
3
Students' Use of Optional Online Reviews and Its Relationship to Summative Assessment Outcomes in Introductory Biology.
学生对可选在线评论的使用及其与生物学入门课程总结性评估结果的关系。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Summer;16(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-06-0205.
4
Group discussions and test-enhanced learning: individual learning outcomes and personality characteristics.小组讨论与测试强化学习:个体学习成果与人格特征
Educ Psychol (Lond). 2017 Feb 7;37(2):145-156. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2016.1143087. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
5
Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity.对于工作记忆容量较低的学生来说,检索练习带来的益处更大。
Memory. 2017 Jul;25(6):764-771. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1220579. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
6
The Prediction of Students' Academic Performance With Fluid Intelligence in Giving Special Consideration to the Contribution of Learning.在特别考虑学习贡献的情况下,用流体智力预测学生的学业成绩。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2015 Sep 30;11(3):97-105. doi: 10.5709/acp-0175-z. eCollection 2015.
7
Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology.运用有效的学习技巧提高学生的学习效果:认知和教育心理学的有前景方向。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Jan;14(1):4-58. doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266.
8
How sample size influences research outcomes.样本量如何影响研究结果。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Jul-Aug;19(4):27-9. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.027-029.ebo.
9
The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect.测试与重测对保持效果的影响:测试效应的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1432-63. doi: 10.1037/a0037559. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
10
The grit effect: predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage.坚毅效应:预测军队、职场、学校和婚姻中的保留率。
Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 3;5:36. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00036. eCollection 2014.