Suppr超能文献

在绩效评估中,学生从多个相互矛盾的信息来源进行批判性推理时信念的作用。

The Role of Students' Beliefs When Critically Reasoning From Multiple Contradictory Sources of Information in Performance Assessments.

作者信息

Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia Olga, Beck Klaus, Fischer Jennifer, Braunheim Dominik, Schmidt Susanne, Shavelson Richard J

机构信息

Department of Business and Economics Education, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 11;11:2192. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02192. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

(CR) when confronted with contradictory information from multiple sources is a crucial ability in a knowledge-based society and digital world. Using information without critically reflecting on the content and its quality may lead to the acceptance of information based on unwarranted claims. Previous personal beliefs are assumed to play a decisive role when it comes to critically differentiating between assertions and claims and warranted knowledge and facts. The role of generic epistemic beliefs on critical stance and attitude in reflectively dealing with information is well researched. Relatively few studies however, have been conducted on the influence of , , and on how these beliefs may affect decision-making processes. This study focuses on students' that may influence their reasoning when dealing with multiple and partly contradictory sources of information. To validly assess CR among university students, we used a newly developed computer-based in which the students were confronted with an authentic task which contains theoretically defined psychological stimuli for measuring CR. To investigate the particular role of task- and topic-related beliefs on CR, a purposeful sample of 30 university students took part in a performance assessment and then were interviewed immediately afterward. In the semi-structured cognitive interviews, the participants' task-related beliefs were assessed. Based on qualitative analyses of the interview transcripts, three distinct among students have been identified. More specifically, the different types of students' beliefs and attitudes derived from the cognitive interview data suggest their influence on information processing, reasoning approaches and decision-making. The results indicated that the students' beliefs had an influence on their selection, critical evaluation and use of information as well as on their reasoning processes and final decisions.

摘要

在知识型社会和数字世界中,面对来自多个来源的相互矛盾的信息时具备批判性推理(CR)能力至关重要。不加批判地思考信息内容及其质量就使用信息,可能会导致基于无根据的主张而接受信息。在批判性地区分断言与主张以及有充分根据的知识与事实时,先前的个人信念被认为起着决定性作用。关于一般认知信念在反思性处理信息时对批判性立场和态度的作用,已有充分研究。然而,相对较少有研究探讨[此处原文缺失部分内容]以及这些信念如何影响决策过程。本研究聚焦于学生在处理多个且部分相互矛盾的信息来源时可能影响其推理的[此处原文缺失部分内容]。为了有效评估大学生的批判性推理能力,我们使用了一种新开发的基于计算机的[此处原文缺失部分内容],其中学生面临一项真实任务,该任务包含理论上定义的用于测量批判性推理的心理刺激因素。为了研究与任务和主题相关的信念对批判性推理的特殊作用,我们有目的地抽取了30名大学生参与一项表现评估,然后立即对他们进行访谈。在半结构化的认知访谈中,评估了参与者与任务相关的信念。基于对访谈记录的定性分析,已识别出学生中的三种不同[此处原文缺失部分内容]。更具体地说,从认知访谈数据中得出的不同类型的学生信念和态度表明了它们对信息处理、推理方法和决策的影响。结果表明,学生的信念对他们对信息的选择、批判性评估和使用以及对他们的推理过程和最终决策都有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37c8/7516056/c817d0a2b0c0/fpsyg-11-02192-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验