Schmidt Susanne, Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia Olga, Roeper Jochen, Klose Verena, Weber Maruschka, Bültmann Ann-Kathrin, Brückner Sebastian
Department of Business and Economics Education, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Department of Neurophysiology, University Hospital of the Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 30;11:576273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576273. eCollection 2020.
To successfully learn using open Internet resources, students must be able to , and Defined as critical online reasoning (COR), this construct is operationalized on two levels in our study: (1) the using the newly developed Critical Online Reasoning Assessment (CORA), and (2) the using event log data, including gaze durations and fixations. The written responses of 32 students for one CORA task were scored by three independent raters. The resulting score was operationalized as "task performance," whereas the gaze fixations and durations were defined as indicators of "process performance." Following a person-oriented approach, we conducted a process mining (PM) analysis, as well as a latent class analysis (LCA) to test whether-following the dual-process theory-the undergraduates could be distinguished into two groups based on both their process and task performance. Using PM, the process performance of all 32 students was visualized and compared, indicating two distinct response process patterns. One group of students (11), defined as "strategic information processers," processed online information more comprehensively, as well as more efficiently, which was also reflected in their higher task scores. In contrast, the distributions of the process performance variables for the other group (21), defined as "avoidance information processers," indicated a poorer process performance, which was also reflected in their lower task scores. In the LCA, where two student groups were empirically distinguished by combining the process performance indicators and the task score as a joint discriminant criterion, we confirmed these two COR profiles, which were reflected in high vs. low process and task performances. The estimated parameters indicated that high-performing students were significantly more efficient at conducting strategic information processing, as reflected in their higher process performance. These findings are so far based on quantitative analyses using event log data. To enable a more differentiated analysis of students' visual attention dynamics, more in-depth qualitative research of the identified student profiles in terms of COR will be required.
为了通过开放的互联网资源成功学习,学生必须能够……(此处原文缺失部分内容),并……(此处原文缺失部分内容)。这一概念被定义为批判性在线推理(COR),在我们的研究中,它在两个层面上得以实施:(1)使用新开发的批判性在线推理评估(CORA)来……(此处原文缺失部分内容),以及(2)使用事件日志数据,包括注视持续时间和注视点,来……(此处原文缺失部分内容)。32名学生针对一项CORA任务的书面回答由三名独立评分者进行评分。所得分数被用作“任务表现”的衡量指标,而注视点和持续时间则被定义为“过程表现”的指标。遵循以人为本的方法,我们进行了过程挖掘(PM)分析以及潜在类别分析(LCA),以检验——根据双过程理论——本科生是否可以基于他们的过程表现和任务表现被分为两组。通过PM,所有32名学生的过程表现被可视化并进行了比较,显示出两种不同的反应过程模式。一组学生(11名)被定义为“策略性信息处理者”,他们更全面、更高效地处理在线信息,这也体现在他们较高的任务分数上。相比之下,另一组学生(21名)被定义为“回避性信息处理者”,其过程表现变量的分布表明他们的过程表现较差,这也反映在他们较低的任务分数上。在LCA中,通过将过程表现指标和任务分数作为联合判别标准,从经验上区分出了两个学生组,我们证实了这两种COR概况,它们分别体现在高与低的过程表现和任务表现上。估计参数表明,表现优秀的学生在进行策略性信息处理时效率显著更高,这体现在他们较高的过程表现上。到目前为止,这些发现是基于使用事件日志数据的定量分析。为了能够对学生的视觉注意力动态进行更具区分性的分析,将需要对根据COR确定的学生概况进行更深入的定性研究。