Suppr超能文献

体外受精中的黄体支持:循证医学与实际操作的比较。

Luteal Phase Support in IVF: Comparison Between Evidence-Based Medicine and Real-Life Practices.

机构信息

Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Gynecology and Obstetrics Section, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Aug 18;11:500. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00500. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Luteal phase support (LPS) in assisted reproduction cycles has been widely investigated in recent years. Although progesterone represents the preferential product for luteal phase supplementation in cycles with fresh embryo transfer, there is ongoing debate as to when to start, which is the best route, dosage and duration, and whether there is a place for additional agents. Nevertheless, fertility specialists do not always adhere to evidence-based recommendations in their clinical practice. The aim of this worldwide web-based survey is to document the currently used protocols for luteal phase support and appraisal tendencies of drug prescription behavior and to compare these to the existing evidence-based literature. A questionnaire was developed and sent by secure e-mail to 1,480 clinicians involved in ART worldwide. One hundred and forty-eighth clinicians from 34 countries returned completed questionnaires. Progesterone support is usually started on the day of oocyte retrieval. Eighty percent of clinicians applied the administration of vaginal progesterone only. Intramuscular progesterone was prescribed by 6%, while oral progestin or subcutaneous progesterone were each prescribed by 5% of clinicians, respectively. Progesterone was administered until 8-10 weeks' gestation by 35% and 12 weeks by 52% of respondents. Vaginal administration was the preferred route for luteal phase support. The reported emerging use of the oral route confirms the expected shift in clinical practice as a result of recent evidence showing a reassuring safety score of oral progestins. In spite of the lack of evidence supporting the continuation of luteal support until 12 weeks' gestation, this practice was adhered to by more than half of the clinicians surveyed, highlighting the difference between evidence-based medicine and real-life practices.

摘要

近年来,辅助生殖周期中的黄体支持(LPS)得到了广泛的研究。虽然在新鲜胚胎移植周期中,孕激素是黄体支持的首选药物,但关于何时开始、最佳途径、剂量和持续时间以及是否需要添加其他药物仍存在争议。然而,生育专家在临床实践中并不总是遵循基于证据的建议。本项基于互联网的全球调查旨在记录目前黄体支持的使用方案,并评估药物处方行为的趋势,将其与现有的基于证据的文献进行比较。 我们开发了一份问卷,并通过安全电子邮件发送给全球参与辅助生殖技术的 1480 名临床医生。来自 34 个国家的 148 名临床医生回复了完整的问卷。 孕激素支持通常在取卵日开始。80%的临床医生仅应用阴道孕激素。6%的临床医生开肌内注射孕激素,5%的临床医生分别开口服孕激素或皮下孕激素。35%的受访者直至妊娠 8-10 周时停止孕激素治疗,52%的受访者直至 12 周时停止孕激素治疗。 阴道给药是黄体支持的首选途径。口服途径的报道用途证实了由于最近的证据表明口服孕激素具有令人安心的安全性评分,因此临床实践中出现了预期的转变。尽管缺乏支持黄体支持持续至 12 周妊娠的证据,但超过一半的被调查临床医生仍坚持这一做法,这突出了基于证据的医学与现实生活实践之间的差异。

相似文献

6
The role of luteal support during IVF: a qualitative systematic review.IVF 中黄体支持的作用:一项定性系统评价。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Oct;35(10):829-834. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1603288. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
7
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.辅助生殖周期的黄体期支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD009154. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009154.pub2.
8
Luteal support in reproduction: when, what and how?生殖中的黄体支持:时机、方式和内容?
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;21(3):279-84. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32832952ab.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.辅助生殖周期的黄体期支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 7;2015(7):CD009154. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009154.pub3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验