Refaei Mansoureh, Ahmadini Hassan, Masoumi Seyedeh-Zahra, Shayan Arezoo
Department of Midwifery, Mother and Child Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
PhD Student of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2020 Jun 17;25(4):356-358. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_255_19. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
This study aimed to design and execute a reliable checklist for evaluating midwifery students' clinical skills.
In this cross-sectional study, 8 checklists were designed and validated for midwifery procedures. The students' performances were compared using this method and two other evaluation methods.
The face and content validity of all questions were approved (content validity ratio and content validity index >0.80, inter-rater reliability >0.50, and Cronbach's alpha >0.70). The rate of the students' satisfaction was 19%, 14%, and 76% with the nonchecklist method, the general checklist, and the designed checklist, respectively. Furthermore, both students (F= 107.07, < 0.004) and evaluators (F = 152.23, < 0.001) gained significantly higher attitude scores towards the new checklist compared to the two other methods.
The designed checklist was quite reliable and valid for evaluating the midwifery students' clinical skills.
本研究旨在设计并执行一份用于评估助产专业学生临床技能的可靠检查表。
在这项横断面研究中，针对助产程序设计并验证了8份检查表。采用该方法以及其他两种评估方法对学生的表现进行比较。
所有问题的表面效度和内容效度均得到认可（内容效度比和内容效度指数>0.80，评分者间信度>0.50，克朗巴哈系数>0.70）。学生对非检查表法、通用检查表和设计检查表的满意度分别为19%、14%和76%。此外，与其他两种方法相比，学生（F = 107.07，P < 0.004）和评估者（F = 152.23，P < 0.001）对新检查表的态度得分均显著更高。
所设计的检查表在评估助产专业学生临床技能方面相当可靠且有效。
