PMI R&D, Philip Morris Products SA, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Imperial Brands PLC, Bristol, UK.
J Appl Toxicol. 2021 Jan;41(1):161-174. doi: 10.1002/jat.4064. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are being developed as potentially reduced-risk alternatives to the continued use of combustible tobacco products. Because of the widespread uptake of ENDS-in particular, e-cigarettes-the biological effects, including the toxic potential, of their aerosols are under investigation. Preclinically, collection of such aerosols is a prerequisite for testing in submerged cell culture-based in vitro assays; however, despite the growth in this research area, there is no apparent standardized collection method for this application. To this end, through an Institute for in vitro Sciences, Inc. workshop initiative, we surveyed the biomedical literature catalogued in PubMed® to map the types of methods hitherto used and reported publicly. From the 47 relevant publications retrieved, we identified seven distinct collection methods. Bubble-through (with aqueous solvents) and Cambridge filter pad (CFP) (with polar solvents) collection were the most frequently cited methods (57% and 18%, respectively), while the five others (CFP + bubble-through; condensation; cotton filters; settle-upon; settle-upon + dry) were cited less often (2-10%). Critically, the collected aerosol fractions were generally found to be only minimally characterized chemically, if at all. Furthermore, there was large heterogeneity among other experimental parameters (e.g., vaping regimen). Consequently, we recommend that more comprehensive research be conducted to identify the method(s) that produce the fraction(s) most representative of the native aerosol. We also endorse standardization of the aerosol generation process. These should be regarded as opportunities for increasing the value of in vitro assessments in relation to predicting effects on human health.
电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)作为可燃烟草产品的潜在减害替代品正在被开发。由于 ENDS 的广泛使用——尤其是电子烟——其气溶胶的生物效应,包括其毒性潜力,正在被研究。在临床前,此类气溶胶的收集是在基于浸没细胞培养的体外测定中进行测试的前提;然而,尽管该研究领域有所增长,针对这种应用,似乎并没有明显的标准化收集方法。为此,通过 Institute for in vitro Sciences, Inc. 的研讨会倡议,我们调查了 PubMed® 中分类的生物医学文献,以绘制迄今为止使用和公开报告的方法类型图。从检索到的 47 篇相关出版物中,我们确定了七种不同的收集方法。气泡通过(与水性溶剂)和剑桥滤垫(CFP)(与极性溶剂)收集是最常被引用的方法(分别为 57%和 18%),而其他五种(CFP+气泡通过;冷凝;棉过滤器;沉降;沉降+干燥)被引用的次数较少(2-10%)。至关重要的是,所收集的气溶胶部分通常仅进行了最低限度的化学特征描述,如果有的话。此外,其他实验参数(例如,蒸气发生方案)之间存在很大的异质性。因此,我们建议进行更全面的研究,以确定产生最能代表原生气溶胶部分的方法。我们还支持气溶胶生成过程的标准化。这些应被视为提高体外评估在预测对人类健康影响方面的价值的机会。