Hannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Dec;31(12):3286-3292. doi: 10.1111/jce.14769. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
In patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) can be an alternative to transvenous ICD systems due to reduced risk of systemic infection, which could lead to extraction of the ICD as well as the LVAD. S-ICD eligibility is lower in patients with LVAD than in patients with end-stage heart failure without LVAD. Several reports have shown inappropriate S-ICD therapy in the coexistence of LVAD and S-ICD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate S-ICD eligibility in patients with LVAD using the established electrocardiogram (ECG)-based screening test as well as a novel device-based screening test to identify potentially inappropriate S-ICD sensing in this specific patient cohort.
The present study included 115 patients implanted with an LVAD. The standard ECG-based screening test and a novel device-based screening test were performed in all patients. Eighty patients (70%) were eligible for S-ICD therapy with the standard ECG-based screening test. Performance of the novel device-based screening test identified device-device interference in 14 of these 80 patients (12%).
Using a novel extended device-based S-ICD screening method, a small number of patients with LVAD deemed eligible for S-ICD with the standard ECG-based screening test exhibit device-device interference. Careful S-ICD screening should be performed in patients with LVAD, who are candidates for S-ICD therapy, to prevent inappropriate sensing or ICD therapy.
在左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者中,由于系统感染风险降低,可将皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)作为经静脉植入式心律转复除颤器系统的替代方法,这可能导致 ICD 和 LVAD 的取出。与没有 LVAD 的终末期心力衰竭患者相比,LVAD 患者的 S-ICD 适应证较低。有几项报告显示,在 LVAD 与 S-ICD 共存的情况下,S-ICD 治疗不当。本研究旨在使用已建立的心电图(ECG)为基础的筛查试验和一种新型基于设备的筛查试验,评估 LVAD 患者的 S-ICD 适应证,以确定在这一特定患者群体中,S-ICD 感知的潜在不适当性。
本研究共纳入 115 例植入 LVAD 的患者。所有患者均进行标准 ECG 为基础的筛查试验和新型基于设备的筛查试验。标准 ECG 为基础的筛查试验有 80 例患者(70%)符合 S-ICD 治疗适应证。新型基于设备的筛查试验发现,在这 80 例患者中有 14 例(12%)存在设备间干扰。
使用新型扩展基于设备的 S-ICD 筛查方法,在符合标准 ECG 为基础的筛查试验标准的、被认为适合 S-ICD 的少数 LVAD 患者中,存在设备间干扰。应在 LVAD 患者中仔细进行 S-ICD 筛查,这些患者是 S-ICD 治疗的候选者,以防止出现不适当的感知或 ICD 治疗。