Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo.
Department of Psychology, Trent University.
Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;31(11):1452-1460. doi: 10.1177/0956797620953842. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
Rosenbaum, Mama, and Algom (2017) reported that participants who completed the Stroop task (i.e., name the hue of a color word when the hue and word meaning are congruent or incongruent) showed a smaller Stroop effect (i.e., the difference in response times between congruent and incongruent trials) when they performed the task standing than when sitting. We report five attempted replications (analyzed sample sizes: = 108, = 108, = 98, = 78, and = 51, respectively) of Rosenbaum et al.'s findings, which were conducted in two institutions. All experiments yielded the standard Stroop effect, but we failed to detect any consistent effect of posture (sitting vs. standing) on the magnitude of the Stroop effect. Taken together, the results suggest that posture does not influence the magnitude of the Stroop effect to the extent that was previously suggested.
罗森鲍姆、妈妈和阿尔戈姆(2017 年)报告称,与坐姿相比,完成斯特鲁普任务(即当颜色词的色调与词义一致或不一致时说出颜色词的色调)的参与者站立时的斯特鲁普效应(即一致和不一致试验之间的反应时间差异)较小。我们报告了对罗森鲍姆等人的发现进行的五次尝试复制(分析样本量分别为 = 108、 = 108、 = 98、 = 78 和 = 51),这些复制在两个机构中进行。所有实验都产生了标准的斯特鲁普效应,但我们未能检测到姿势(坐姿与站姿)对斯特鲁普效应大小的任何一致影响。总的来说,结果表明,姿势对斯特鲁普效应的大小没有以前认为的那么大的影响。