Yun Bei, Su Qian, Cai Yi-Tong, Chen Lian, Qu Chao-Ran, Han Lin
School of nursing, Lanzhou University.
Department of nursing, Gansu Provincial Hospital, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 2;99(40):e21668. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021668.
One of the major challenges in nursing and medical education is to foster the critical thinking ability and autonomous learning ability for students. But the effect of different teaching methods on these abilities of nursing or medical students has not been conclusive, and few studies have directly compared the differences in the effects of different teaching methods. As a result, it is necessary for students to evaluate the impact of different teaching methods on critical thinking ability and autonomous learning ability.
A systematic search will be performed using Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data (Chinese database), VIP Information (Chinese database), Chinese Biomedical Literature, and English language databases, including PubMed and Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete (EBSCO0, Cochrane library to identify relevant studies from inception to July 10, 2020. We will include random controlled trials that evaluated the different teaching methods. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 quality assessment tool will be used to assess the risk of bias in each study. Standard pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis will be performed using STATA V.12.0, MetaDiSc 1.40, and R 3.4.1 software to compare the diagnostic efficacy of different hormonal biomarkers.
The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
This study will summarize the direct and indirect evidence to determine the effectiveness of different teaching methods for medical or nursing students and attempt to find the most effective teaching method.
Ethics approval and patient consent are not required, because this study is a meta-analysis based on published studies.
INPLASY202070017.
护理和医学教育的主要挑战之一是培养学生的批判性思维能力和自主学习能力。但不同教学方法对护理或医学专业学生这些能力的影响尚无定论，且很少有研究直接比较不同教学方法效果的差异。因此，学生有必要评估不同教学方法对批判性思维能力和自主学习能力的影响。
将使用中国知网、万方数据（中文数据库）、维普资讯（中文数据库）、中国生物医学文献以及英文数据库，包括PubMed、Embase、科学网、CINAHL Complete（EBSCO）、Cochrane图书馆，进行系统检索，以识别从创刊至2020年7月10日的相关研究。我们将纳入评估不同教学方法的随机对照试验。将使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2质量评估工具来评估每项研究中的偏倚风险。将使用STATA V.12.0、MetaDiSc 1.40和R 3.4.1软件进行标准的成对荟萃分析和网状荟萃分析，以比较不同激素生物标志物的诊断效能。
本研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊上。
本研究将总结直接和间接证据，以确定不同教学方法对医学或护理专业学生的有效性，并尝试找到最有效的教学方法。
无需伦理批准和患者同意，因为本研究是基于已发表研究的荟萃分析。
INPLASY注册号：INPLASY202070017。
