Department of Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Apr;30(4):337-352. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010887. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
With the integration of quality improvement (QI) into competency-based models of physician training, there is an increasing requirement for medical students and residents to demonstrate competence in QI. There may be factors that commonly facilitate or inhibit the desired outcomes of QI curricula in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. The purpose of this review was to synthesise attributes of QI curricula in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education associated with curricular outcomes.
A realist synthesis of peer-reviewed and grey literature was conducted to identify the common contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes of QI curricula in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education in order to develop a programme theory to articulate what works, for whom, and in what contexts.
18854 records underwent title and abstract screening, full texts of 609 records were appraised for eligibility, data were extracted from 358 studies, and 218 studies were included in the development and refinement of the final programme theory. Contexts included curricular strategies, levels of training, clinical settings, and organisational culture. Mechanisms were identified within the overall QI curricula itself (eg, clear expectations and deliverables, and protected time), in the didactic components (ie, content delivery strategies), and within the experiential components (eg, topic selection strategies, working with others, and mentorship). Mechanisms were often associated with certain contexts to promote educational and clinical outcomes.
This research describes the various pedagogical strategies for teaching QI to medical learners and highlights the contexts and mechanisms that could potentially account for differences in educational and clinical outcomes of QI curricula. Educators may benefit from considering these contexts and mechanisms in the design and implementation of QI curricula to optimise the outcomes of training in this competency area.
随着质量改进(QI)融入医师培训的能力本位模式,越来越需要医学生和住院医师展示在 QI 方面的能力。在本科和研究生医学教育中,可能存在一些共同的因素,这些因素通常会促进或阻碍 QI 课程的预期效果。本研究的目的是综合本科和研究生医学教育中与课程结果相关的 QI 课程属性。
对同行评议和灰色文献进行了真实主义综合,以确定本科和研究生医学教育中 QI 课程的常见背景、机制和结果,从而制定一个方案理论,阐明什么有效、对谁有效、在什么背景下有效。
18854 条记录经过标题和摘要筛选,对 609 条记录的全文进行了合格性评估,从 358 项研究中提取了数据,并将 218 项研究纳入最终方案理论的制定和完善。背景包括课程策略、培训水平、临床环境和组织文化。机制在整个 QI 课程本身(例如,明确的期望和可交付成果,以及受保护的时间)、教学成分(即内容传递策略)和体验式成分(例如,主题选择策略、与他人合作和指导)中被识别出来。机制通常与某些背景相关,以促进教育和临床结果。
本研究描述了向医学学习者教授 QI 的各种教学策略,并强调了可能导致 QI 课程教育和临床结果差异的背景和机制。教育者在设计和实施 QI 课程时,可能会受益于考虑这些背景和机制,以优化这一能力领域的培训效果。