Suppr超能文献

高C因子窝洞中大块充填树脂复合材料修复体的微拉伸粘结强度

Microtensile Bond Strength of Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restorations in High C-factor Cavities.

作者信息

de Oliveira Isabelle Lins Macêdo, de Brito Oscar Felipe Fonseca, de Melo Monteiro Laís Maciel Costa Gabriela Queiroz, Resende Montes Marcos Antônio Japiassu

机构信息

Dental School, Universidade de Pernambuco, Camaragibe, Pernambuco, Brazil, Phone: +55 8131847659, e-mail:

Dental School, Universidade de Pernambuco, Camaragibe, Pernambuco, Brazil.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Jun 1;21(6):626-631.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and the fracture modes of four bulk-fill resin composites (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill/Ivoclar Vivadent, Filtek Bulk Fill/3M ESPE, Venus Bulk Fill/Heraus Kulzer, and Filtek Bulk Fill Flow/3M ESPE) and one conventional incrementally filled resin composite (Filtek Z250/3M ESPE) inserted in class I cavities, after 24 hours and 6 months of water storage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In all, 30 sound human extracted molars were divided into five restorative groups. Standardized class I cavities were prepared and restored following the manufacturer's instructions. The restored teeth were then assigned into one of the storage times (24 hours or 6 months). The molars were then cut into 1 mm sticks and submitted to μTBS. All fractured specimens were analyzed under a stereomicroscope (40×). Data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey test was applied for comparison between groups; and paired test for comparison within storage times ( = 0.05).

RESULTS

After 24 hours of storage, statistically significant differences were observed between Filtek Z250 and Filtek Bulk Fill Flow groups. However, after 6 months, no statistical differences were observed between groups. Additionally, no differences were observed for the μTBS between the storage times. Adhesive failures were the most frequent fracture mode after 24 hours (54%) and 6 months (43%), the resin cohesive fracture mode showed 16% for 24 hours and 14% for 6 months, the dentin cohesive fracture mode showed 14% for 24 hours and 26% for 6 months, and the mixed fracture mode showed 16% for 24 hours and 17% for 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Bulk-fill resin composites obtained similar μTBS in high C-factor cavities as conventional incrementally filled resin composites. No bond strength reduction was observed after 6 months of storage.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Single increment restorations in high C-factor cavities with bulk-fill resin composites did not reduce μTBS after 24 hours or 6 months of storage. The comparable results to the conventional incrementally filled resin composites and the reduction in the operative time, make the bulk-fill resin composites a restorative option for posterior teeth restorations.

摘要

目的

评估四种大块充填树脂复合材料(Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill/义获嘉伟瓦登特公司,Filtek Bulk Fill/3M ESPE公司,Venus Bulk Fill/贺利氏古莎公司,以及Filtek Bulk Fill Flow/3M ESPE公司)和一种传统分层充填树脂复合材料(Filtek Z250/3M ESPE公司)在Ⅰ类洞型中充填24小时和储存6个月后的微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)及断裂模式。

材料与方法

总共30颗完好的人离体磨牙被分为五个修复组。按照制造商的说明制备并充填标准化的Ⅰ类洞型。然后将修复后的牙齿分配到其中一个储存时间(24小时或6个月)。接着将磨牙切成1毫米厚的薄片并进行微拉伸粘结强度测试。所有断裂的样本在体视显微镜(40倍)下进行分析。数据进行方差分析(ANOVA),并应用Tukey检验进行组间比较;应用配对检验进行储存时间内的比较(α = 0.05)。

结果

储存24小时后,观察到Filtek Z250组和Filtek Bulk Fill Flow组之间存在统计学显著差异。然而,6个月后,各组之间未观察到统计学差异。此外,储存时间之间的微拉伸粘结强度也未观察到差异。粘结失败是24小时后(54%)和6个月后(43%)最常见的断裂模式,树脂内聚性断裂模式在24小时时为16%,6个月时为14%,牙本质内聚性断裂模式在24小时时为14%,6个月时为26%,混合断裂模式在24小时时为16%,6个月时为17%。

结论

在高C因素洞型中,大块充填树脂复合材料获得的微拉伸粘结强度与传统分层充填树脂复合材料相似。储存6个月后未观察到粘结强度降低。

临床意义

使用大块充填树脂复合材料对高C因素洞型进行单次充填修复,在储存24小时或6个月后,微拉伸粘结强度并未降低。与传统分层充填树脂复合材料的可比结果以及操作时间的减少,使大块充填树脂复合材料成为后牙修复的一种修复选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验