• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多发性骨髓瘤治疗格局与生存率的趋势:一项使用2011 - 2019年肿瘤诊所电子健康记录数据的美国分析。

Trends in the multiple myeloma treatment landscape and survival: a U.S. analysis using 2011-2019 oncology clinic electronic health record data.

作者信息

Braunlin Megan, Belani Rajesh, Buchanan Jacqueline, Wheeling Travis, Kim Christopher

机构信息

Amgen, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

Amgen Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Leuk Lymphoma. 2021 Feb;62(2):377-386. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1827253. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1080/10428194.2020.1827253
PMID:33026271
Abstract

Multiple myeloma treatment has evolved with approvals of new immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiDs), monoclonal antibodies (MoABs), and proteasome inhibitors (PIs). We characterized U.S. treatment trends and survival from 2011 to 2019 using Flatiron data from multiple myeloma patients followed from treatment index until death/end of data. Patients ( = 10,553) were primarily (88%) treated in community centers. Frontline PI-IMiD-dexamethasone use increased over time, while IMiD-dexamethasone and PI-dexamethasone use decreased. MoAB-IMiD-dexamethasone use increased in relapsed/refractory disease. In all lines, use of doublets decreased and triplets increased, with triplets becoming the most prescribed combination by 2018-2019, especially in first line (62%). Monotherapy use decreased in first line (19% to 10%) but remained steady in relapsed/refractory disease (∼20%). With each increasing line of therapy, median overall survival decreased (60, 48, 36, 29, 23 months). Survival increased with more recent diagnosis. Our results indicate that the multiple myeloma landscape has evolved significantly in the last decade.

摘要

随着新型免疫调节性酰亚胺药物(IMiDs)、单克隆抗体(MoABs)和蛋白酶体抑制剂(PIs)的获批,多发性骨髓瘤的治疗方法不断发展。我们利用Flatiron数据对2011年至2019年美国多发性骨髓瘤患者的治疗趋势和生存率进行了分析,这些数据涵盖了从治疗开始到死亡/数据结束的患者情况。患者(n = 10553)主要(88%)在社区中心接受治疗。一线使用蛋白酶体抑制剂-免疫调节性酰亚胺药物-地塞米松的情况随时间增加,而免疫调节性酰亚胺药物-地塞米松和蛋白酶体抑制剂-地塞米松的使用则减少。在复发/难治性疾病中,单克隆抗体-免疫调节性酰亚胺药物-地塞米松的使用增加。在所有治疗线中,双联疗法的使用减少,三联疗法的使用增加,到2018 - 2019年,三联疗法成为最常用的联合治疗方案,尤其是在一线治疗中(62%)。一线单药治疗的使用从19%降至10%,但在复发/难治性疾病中保持稳定(约20%)。随着治疗线数的增加,中位总生存期缩短(60、48、36、29、23个月)。生存率随着诊断时间的推移而提高。我们的结果表明,在过去十年中,多发性骨髓瘤的治疗格局发生了显著变化。

相似文献

1
Trends in the multiple myeloma treatment landscape and survival: a U.S. analysis using 2011-2019 oncology clinic electronic health record data.多发性骨髓瘤治疗格局与生存率的趋势:一项使用2011 - 2019年肿瘤诊所电子健康记录数据的美国分析。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2021 Feb;62(2):377-386. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1827253. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
2
Efficacy of retreatment with immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors following daratumumab monotherapy in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients.达雷妥尤单抗单药治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者后的免疫调节剂药物和蛋白酶体抑制剂再治疗的疗效。
Br J Haematol. 2018 Oct;183(1):60-67. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15504. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
3
Optimizing Immunomodulatory Drug With Proteasome Inhibitor Combinations in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.优化新诊断多发性骨髓瘤中免疫调节剂药物与蛋白酶体抑制剂的联合方案。
Cancer J. 2019 Jan/Feb;25(1):2-10. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000348.
4
Daratumumab in multiple myeloma: experience of the multiple myeloma GIMEMA Lazio group.达雷妥尤单抗治疗多发性骨髓瘤:多发性骨髓瘤 GIMEMA 拉齐奥组的经验。
Ann Hematol. 2021 Apr;100(4):1059-1063. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04374-y. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
5
Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors in Germany.在德国,接受蛋白酶体抑制剂治疗的复发性/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的特征和结局。
Oncol Res Treat. 2020;43(9):449-459. doi: 10.1159/000509018. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
6
Utilization of novel systemic therapies for multiple myeloma: A retrospective study of front-line regimens using the SEER-Medicare data.新型系统性疗法在多发性骨髓瘤中的应用:利用 SEER-医疗保险数据进行的一线方案回顾性研究。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jan;9(2):626-639. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2698. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
7
LocoMMotion: a prospective, non-interventional, multinational study of real-life current standards of care in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.LocoMMotion 研究:一项针对复发和/或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的真实临床实践中现行标准治疗的前瞻性、非干预性、多国研究。
Leukemia. 2022 May;36(5):1371-1376. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01531-2. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
8
Once weekly versus twice weekly carfilzomib dosing in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (A.R.R.O.W.): interim analysis results of a randomised, phase 3 study.每周一次与每周两次卡非佐米给药治疗复发和难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者(A.R.R.O.W.):一项随机、3 期研究的中期分析结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):953-964. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30354-1. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
9
Daratumumab and its use in the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.达雷妥尤单抗及其在复发和/或难治性多发性骨髓瘤治疗中的应用。
Future Oncol. 2018 Dec;14(30):3111-3121. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0275. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
10
EMA Review of Daratumumab for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Multiple Myeloma.EMA 对达雷妥尤单抗治疗多发性骨髓瘤成人患者的评估。
Oncologist. 2018 May;23(5):594-602. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0328. Epub 2018 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world patient profile and step-up dosing process of early initiators of teclistamab for multiple myeloma in US hospitals: An analysis using the Premier Healthcare Database.美国医院中多发性骨髓瘤患者使用替西妥单抗早期启动者的真实世界患者概况及逐步给药过程:一项使用Premier医疗数据库的分析
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Aug;31(8):772-781. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.8.772.
2
Predictors of frontline doublet or triplet regimen initiation in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.移植不适用的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者一线双联或三联方案起始治疗的预测因素
Future Sci OA. 2025 Dec;11(1):2528523. doi: 10.1080/20565623.2025.2528523. Epub 2025 Jul 12.
3
Multiple myeloma care, treatment patterns, and treatment durations in academic and community care settings.
学术及社区医疗环境中的多发性骨髓瘤护理、治疗模式及治疗持续时间。
Future Oncol. 2025 Jun;21(15):1905-1918. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2504318. Epub 2025 May 21.
4
Impact of social determinants of health on treatment patterns and outcomes in multiple myeloma.健康的社会决定因素对多发性骨髓瘤治疗模式及结局的影响
Future Oncol. 2025 Jun;21(13):1663-1673. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2498878. Epub 2025 May 12.
5
Real-world treatment patterns, outcomes, and economic costs by lines of therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a nationwide population-based cohort study in South Korea.新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者按治疗线划分的真实世界治疗模式、结局及经济成本:韩国一项基于全国人群的队列研究
Blood Res. 2025 Apr 15;60(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s44313-025-00069-3.
6
Multiple myeloma as a challenging multidimensional random process: a data-driven web-based application for treatment selection.多发性骨髓瘤作为一个具有挑战性的多维度随机过程:一种基于数据驱动的网络治疗选择应用程序。
Blood Cancer J. 2025 Feb 27;15(1):26. doi: 10.1038/s41408-025-01238-4.
7
Deciphering response dynamics and treatment resistance from circulating tumor DNA after CAR T-cells in multiple myeloma.解读多发性骨髓瘤中嵌合抗原受体T细胞治疗后循环肿瘤DNA的反应动态及治疗耐药性
Nat Commun. 2025 Feb 20;16(1):1824. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56486-6.
8
Comparison of outcomes by race among a population-based matched sample of multiple myeloma patients.基于人群的多发性骨髓瘤患者匹配样本中不同种族的结局比较。
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Apr;36(4):433-442. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01938-5. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
9
Comparison of Time to Next Treatment or Death Between Front-Line Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DRd) Versus Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VRd) Among Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Multiple Myeloma.不适合移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者中,一线达雷妥尤单抗、来那度胺和地塞米松(DRd)与硼替佐米、来那度胺和地塞米松(VRd)之间的下一次治疗或死亡时间比较。
Cancer Med. 2024 Nov;13(21):e70308. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70308.
10
Comparative Meta-Analysis of Triplet vs. Quadruplet Induction Regimens in Newly Diagnosed, Treatment Naïve, Multiple Myeloma.初诊、未经治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者中三联与四联诱导方案的比较荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 23;16(17):2938. doi: 10.3390/cancers16172938.