Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milan, Italy.
Biologist-OT Validation Specialist, 60035 Jesi, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 5;17(19):7275. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197275.
In Operating Theatres (OT), the ventilation system plays an important role in controlling airborne contamination and reducing the risks of Surgical Site Infections (SSIs). The air cleanliness is really crucial in this field and different measurements are used in order to characterize the situation in terms of both airborne microbiological pollutants and particle size and concentration. Although the ventilation systems and airborne contamination are strictly linked, different air diffusion schemes (in particular, the Partial Unidirectional Airflow, P-UDAF, and the Mixing Airflow, MAF) and various design parameters are used, and there is still no consensus on real performance and optimum solutions. This study presents measurements procedures and results obtained during Inspection and Periodic Performance Testing (1228 observations) in a large sample of Italian OTs (175 OTs in 31 Italian hospitals) in their operative life (period from 2010 to 2018). The inspections were made after a cleaning procedure, both in "at-rest" conditions and "in operation" state. Inert and microbial contamination data (in air and on surfaces) are analyzed and commented according to four relevant air diffusion schemes and design classes. Related data on Recovery Time (RT) and personnel presence were picked up and are commented. The results confirm that the ventilation systems are able to maintain the targeted performance levels in the OT operative life. However, they attest that significant differences in real OT contamination control capabilities do exist and could be ascribed to various design choices and to different operation and maintenance practices. The study shows and confirms that the air diffusion scheme and the design airflow rate are critical factors. Beside large variations in measurements, the performance values, in terms of control of airborne particle and microbial contamination (in air and on surfaces), for P-UDAF systems are better than those that were assessed for the MAF air diffusion solution. The average performances do increase with increasing airflows, and the results offer a better insight on this relationship leading to some possible optimization.
在手术室(OT)中,通风系统在控制空气传播污染和降低手术部位感染(SSI)风险方面起着重要作用。空气清洁度在该领域非常关键,并且使用了不同的测量方法来描述空气微生物污染物和粒径及浓度的情况。尽管通风系统和空气传播污染密切相关,但使用了不同的空气扩散方案(特别是部分单向气流、P-UDAF 和混合气流、MAF)和各种设计参数,对于实际性能和最佳解决方案仍未达成共识。本研究介绍了在意大利大型 OT 样本(31 家意大利医院的 175 个 OT)的运行寿命(2010 年至 2018 年期间)中进行检查和定期性能测试(1228 次观察)期间获得的测量程序和结果。检查是在清洁程序之后进行的,包括“静止”和“运行”状态。根据四个相关的空气扩散方案和设计类别,对惰性和微生物污染数据(空气和表面上)进行了分析和评论。还收集了与恢复时间(RT)和人员在场相关的数据,并进行了评论。结果证实,通风系统能够在 OT 运行寿命内保持目标性能水平。然而,它们也证明了在实际 OT 污染控制能力方面确实存在显著差异,这些差异可归因于各种设计选择以及不同的操作和维护实践。研究表明并证实了空气扩散方案和设计气流速率是关键因素。除了测量值的巨大差异外,P-UDAF 系统在控制空气传播颗粒和微生物污染(空气和表面)方面的性能值优于评估的 MAF 空气扩散解决方案。平均性能随空气流量的增加而提高,结果提供了对此关系的更深入了解,从而可以进行一些优化。