• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Enhancing Surgical Safety: Microbiological Air Control in Operating Theatres at University Medical Centre Maribor.提高手术安全性:马里博尔大学医学中心手术室的微生物空气控制
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 19;14(10):1054. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14101054.
2
Surveillance of Environmental and Procedural Measures of Infection Control in the Operating Theatre Setting.手术室内感染控制的环境和程序措施监测。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 28;15(1):46. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010046.
3
Microbial air monitoring in operating theatres: experience at the University Hospital of Parma.手术室空气中微生物监测:帕尔马大学医院的经验。
J Hosp Infect. 2012 May;81(1):50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
4
Can particulate air sampling predict microbial load in operating theatres for arthroplasty?空气颗粒物采样能否预测关节置换手术室的微生物负荷?
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052809. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
5
[Air quality and microbiologic contamination in operating theatres].[手术室的空气质量与微生物污染]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1998 Aug 30;118(20):3148-51.
6
Contamination of microbial pathogens and their antimicrobial pattern in operating theatres of peri-urban eastern Uganda: a cross-sectional study.乌干达东部城乡结合部手术室中微生物病原体的污染及其抗菌模式:一项横断面研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 10;18(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3374-4.
7
Monitoring air sampling in operating theatres: can particle counting replace microbiological sampling?手术室空气采样监测:粒子计数能否取代微生物采样?
J Hosp Infect. 2005 Sep;61(1):27-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.03.002.
8
[Hygienic Inspections of Ventilation Systems Under Resting Conditions (According to DIN 1946-4:1999-03) - A Retrospective Assessment].[静态条件下通风系统的卫生检查(依据DIN 1946-4:1999-03)——一项回顾性评估]
Zentralbl Chir. 2018 Dec;143(6):617-624. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-120916. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
9
Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres.空气采样程序评估微生物污染:手术室主动与被动方法的比较。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 2;12:594. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-594.
10
Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system, microbial air contamination and surgical site infection in hip and knee arthroplasties: the GISIO-SItI Ischia study.供暖、通风与空调(HVAC)系统、微生物空气污染与髋膝关节置换术中的手术部位感染:GISIO-SItI伊斯基亚研究
Ann Ig. 2018 Sep-Oct;30(5 Supple 2):22-35. doi: 10.7416/ai.2018.2248.

引用本文的文献

1
The operating theatre as a catalyst for quality care.手术室作为优质护理的催化剂。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 29;25(1):996. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13202-w.
2
Air Contamination in Operating Theatres: The Key Factors That Can Influence It.手术室中的空气污染:影响其的关键因素
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2025 May 11;2025:8852879. doi: 10.1155/cjid/8852879. eCollection 2025.
3
Rise of Revision Arthroplasties in Indian Subcontinent: An Inadvertent Future.印度次大陆翻修关节成形术的兴起:一个意外的未来。
J Orthop Case Rep. 2025 May;15(5):1-5. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.5532.

本文引用的文献

1
Bacterial contamination of air and surfaces during dental procedures-An experimental pilot study using .在牙科操作过程中空气和表面的细菌污染-使用. 的实验性初步研究
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 May;45(5):658-663. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.271. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
2
Seeing is Believing: Chasing Sevoflurane Vapor Trails.眼见为实:追寻七氟醚的踪迹。
J Perianesth Nurs. 2024 Apr;39(2):235-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2023.07.019. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
3
Risk Influence of Some Environmental and Behavioral Factors on Air Contamination in the Operating Room: An Experimental Study.一些环境和行为因素对手术室空气污染的风险影响:一项实验研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 17;20(16):6592. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20166592.
4
Bringing Artificial Intelligence to the operating room: edge computing for real-time surgical phase recognition.将人工智能引入手术室:边缘计算实现实时手术阶段识别。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8778-8784. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10322-4. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
5
Laminar airflow ventilation systems in orthopaedic operating room do not prevent surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.层流通风系统在骨科手术室并不能预防手术部位感染:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 5;18(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03992-2.
6
Exposure to anesthetic gases in the operating rooms and assessment of non-carcinogenic risk among health care workers.手术室中麻醉气体的暴露及医护人员非致癌风险评估
Toxicol Rep. 2023 Jun 10;11:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2023.06.007. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Air microbial sampling in operating theatres by active and passive methods: equation correlation from the GISIO-ISChIA study results and comparison with the EU GGMP recommendation, towards the definition of threshold values.手术室空气微生物采样:主动和被动方法的比较:GISIO-ISChIA 研究结果的方程相关性及其与欧盟 GMP 建议的比较,以确定阈值。
Acta Biomed. 2023 Feb 13;94(1):e2023017. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94i1.14012.
8
The Effectiveness of Laser Applications and Photodynamic Therapy on Relevant Periodontal Pathogens () Associated with Immunomodulating Anti-rheumatic Drugs.激光应用和光动力疗法对与免疫调节抗风湿药物相关的牙周病原菌()的有效性。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jan 4;10(1):61. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10010061.
9
Evaluation of the Results of a Periodic Environmental Biosecurity Assessment Program on Air Quality in Controlled Environment Rooms of Hospitals.医院控制环境病房空气质量定期环境生物安全评估计划结果评估
HERD. 2023 Jan;16(1):161-174. doi: 10.1177/19375867221123608. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
10
Intraoperative Surgical Wound Contamination May Not Lead to Surgical-Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Clean Orthopaedic Procedures.在接受清洁骨科手术的患者中,术中手术伤口污染可能不会导致手术部位感染。
J Lab Physicians. 2022 Feb 9;14(3):284-289. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742422. eCollection 2022 Sep.

提高手术安全性:马里博尔大学医学中心手术室的微生物空气控制

Enhancing Surgical Safety: Microbiological Air Control in Operating Theatres at University Medical Centre Maribor.

作者信息

Gradisnik Lidija, Bunc Gorazd, Ravnik Janez, Velnar Tomaz

机构信息

Medical Faculty Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.

Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 19;14(10):1054. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14101054.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14101054
PMID:38786351
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11120459/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

the aim of the study was to assess microbiological air quality in operating theatres by determining the level of microbiological contamination of the air and critical surfaces using the passive air sampling method and compliance of the operating theatre staff with infection control measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prospective study was conducted in the surgical block of the University Medical Centre Maribor. For two months continuously, ten operating theatres were assessed for microbial contamination of air and surfaces during quiet and active times of the day. A passive air sampling method with Petri dishes on an agar specially adapted for this purpose (plate count agar) was used. In addition, ten surgical procedures were observed to assess staff compliance with recommended practises.

RESULTS

Air samples met microbiological standards in all operating theatres. In both sampling sessions of the day (quiet and active periods), microbial contamination of the air was always within the limit of 10 CFU/m. The average number of bacterial colonies was zero to two during quiet phases and one to four during active phases. Approximately 60% of the isolates from the operating theatres belonged mainly to the genus : (36% of the isolates), (17.5%) and (5.5%). The rest were identified as (23%) and sp. (18%). Pathogenic bacteria and moulds were not present. In regard to staff compliance with good surgical practise, the former varied by behaviour and function, with non-compliance in pre-operative skin preparation and operating theatre congestion being notable. The cleanliness of the environment was satisfactory.

CONCLUSIONS

Microbiological air control is extremely important for the safety and success of both surgical and postoperative practises. In spite of good results obtained in the study, further improvements in surgical staff compliance with good surgical practise are essential to reduce surgical site infections.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是通过使用被动空气采样法测定空气和关键表面的微生物污染水平以及手术室工作人员对感染控制措施的依从性,来评估手术室的微生物空气质量。

材料与方法

前瞻性研究在马里博尔大学医学中心的外科病房进行。连续两个月,在一天中的安静时段和活跃时段对10间手术室的空气和表面微生物污染情况进行评估。采用在专门为此目的适配的琼脂(平板计数琼脂)上放置培养皿的被动空气采样法。此外,观察了10台外科手术以评估工作人员对推荐做法的依从性。

结果

所有手术室的空气样本均符合微生物标准。在一天中的两个采样时段(安静期和活跃期),空气微生物污染始终在10 CFU/m的限值内。安静期细菌菌落平均数为零至两个,活跃期为一至四个。手术室分离出的菌株中约60%主要属于:(36%的分离株)、(17.5%)和(5.5%)。其余分别鉴定为(23%)和sp.(18%)。未发现病原菌和霉菌。关于工作人员对良好手术操作规范的依从性,前者因行为和职能而异,术前皮肤准备不依从和手术室拥挤情况较为明显。环境清洁度令人满意。

结论

微生物空气控制对于手术及术后操作的安全和成功极为重要。尽管本研究取得了良好结果,但进一步提高手术人员对良好手术操作规范的依从性对于减少手术部位感染至关重要。