Suppr超能文献

早期识别的脓毒症与晚期识别的脓毒症之间的死亡率差异。

Mortality difference between early-identified sepsis and late-identified sepsis.

作者信息

Jee Woon, Jo Sion, Lee Jae Baek, Jin Youngho, Jeong Taeoh, Yoon Jae Chol, Park Boyoung

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;7(3):150-160. doi: 10.15441/ceem.19.009. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the mortality rates of patients with early-identified (EI) sepsis and late-identified (LI) sepsis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to the emergency department and diagnosed with sepsis. EI sepsis was defined as patients with a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥2, based on 3 parameters of the SOFA score (Glasgow coma scale, mean arterial pressure, and partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio), measured within an hour of emergency department admission. The remaining patients were defined as LI sepsis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Of the total 204 patients with sepsis, 113 (55.4%) had EI sepsis. Overall mortality rate was 15.7%, and EI sepsis group had significantly higher mortality than LI sepsis (23.0% vs. 6.6%, P=0.003). The patients with EI sepsis, compared to those with LI sepsis, had higher SOFA score (median: 4 vs. 2, P<0.001); Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (median: 14 vs. 10, P<0.001); were more likely to progress to septic shock within 6 hours after admission (17.7% vs. 1.1%, P<0.001); were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (2.2% vs. 1.1%, P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Mortality was significantly higher in the EI sepsis group than in the LI sepsis group.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较早期识别(EI)脓毒症患者和晚期识别(LI)脓毒症患者的死亡率。

方法

我们对急诊科收治并诊断为脓毒症的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。EI脓毒症定义为基于序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的3项参数(格拉斯哥昏迷量表、平均动脉压和氧分压/吸入氧分数比),在急诊科入院后1小时内测得SOFA评分≥2的患者。其余患者定义为LI脓毒症。主要结局是住院死亡率。

结果

在总共204例脓毒症患者中,113例(55.4%)为EI脓毒症。总体死亡率为15.7%,EI脓毒症组的死亡率显著高于LI脓毒症组(23.0%对6.6%,P = 0.003)。与LI脓毒症患者相比,EI脓毒症患者的SOFA评分更高(中位数:4对2,P<0.001);急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分更高(中位数:14对10,P<0.001);入院后6小时内进展为感染性休克的可能性更大(17.7%对1.1%,P<0.001);入住重症监护病房的可能性更大(2.2%对1.1%,P = 0.001)。

结论

EI脓毒症组的死亡率显著高于LI脓毒症组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1535/7550810/44e30785d296/ceem-19-009f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验