Suppr超能文献

理解焦虑表型与神经性厌食症之间的关联性质:三角剖分方法。

Understanding the nature of association between anxiety phenotypes and anorexia nervosa: a triangulation approach.

机构信息

Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School of Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02883-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence from observational studies suggests an association between anxiety disorders and anorexia nervosa (AN), but causal inference is complicated by the potential for confounding in these studies. We triangulate evidence across a longitudinal study and a Mendelian randomization (MR) study, to evaluate whether there is support for anxiety disorder phenotypes exerting a causal effect on AN risk.

METHODS

Study One assessed longitudinal associations of childhood worry and anxiety disorders with lifetime AN in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children cohort. Study Two used two-sample MR to evaluate: causal effects of worry, and genetic liability to anxiety disorders, on AN risk; causal effects of genetic liability to AN on anxiety outcomes; and the causal influence of worry on anxiety disorder development. The independence of effects of worry, relative to depressed affect, on AN and anxiety disorder outcomes, was explored using multivariable MR. Analyses were completed using summary statistics from recent genome-wide association studies.

RESULTS

Study One did not support an association between worry and subsequent AN, but there was strong evidence for anxiety disorders predicting increased risk of AN. Study Two outcomes supported worry causally increasing AN risk, but did not support a causal effect of anxiety disorders on AN development, or of AN on anxiety disorders/worry. Findings also indicated that worry causally influences anxiety disorder development. Multivariable analysis estimates suggested the influence of worry on both AN and anxiety disorders was independent of depressed affect.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall our results provide mixed evidence regarding the causal role of anxiety exposures in AN aetiology. The inconsistency between outcomes of Studies One and Two may be explained by limitations surrounding worry assessment in Study One, confounding of the anxiety disorder and AN association in observational research, and low power in MR analyses probing causal effects of genetic liability to anxiety disorders. The evidence for worry acting as a causal risk factor for anxiety disorders and AN supports targeting worry for prevention of both outcomes. Further research should clarify how a tendency to worry translates into AN risk, and whether anxiety disorder pathology exerts any causal effect on AN.

摘要

背景

观察性研究的证据表明焦虑障碍与神经性厌食症(AN)之间存在关联,但这些研究中存在混杂因素,使得因果推断变得复杂。我们通过一项纵向研究和一项孟德尔随机化(MR)研究来综合证据,以评估焦虑障碍表型是否对 AN 风险有因果作用。

方法

研究一评估了童年担忧和焦虑障碍与阿冯纵向父母与子女研究队列中终生 AN 的纵向关联。研究二使用两样本 MR 来评估:担忧、焦虑障碍遗传易感性对 AN 风险的因果作用;AN 遗传易感性对焦虑结果的因果作用;以及担忧对焦虑障碍发展的因果影响。通过多变量 MR 探索了担忧相对于抑郁情绪对 AN 和焦虑障碍结果的影响的独立性。分析使用了最近全基因组关联研究的汇总统计数据完成。

结果

研究一不支持担忧与随后的 AN 之间存在关联,但有强有力的证据表明焦虑障碍预测 AN 风险增加。研究二的结果支持担忧会导致 AN 风险增加,但不支持焦虑障碍对 AN 发展、或 AN 对焦虑障碍/担忧的因果作用。研究结果还表明担忧会导致焦虑障碍的发展。多变量分析估计表明,担忧对 AN 和焦虑障碍的影响独立于抑郁情绪。

结论

总的来说,我们的研究结果提供了混合证据,表明焦虑暴露在 AN 发病机制中具有因果作用。研究一和研究二的结果不一致可能是由于研究一中对担忧的评估存在局限性、观察性研究中焦虑障碍和 AN 的关联存在混杂因素以及 MR 分析探测焦虑障碍遗传易感性的因果作用的效能较低所致。担忧作为焦虑障碍和 AN 的因果风险因素的证据支持针对担忧进行预防这两种结果。进一步的研究应该阐明担忧倾向如何转化为 AN 风险,以及焦虑障碍病理是否对 AN 有任何因果作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验