Luo Zhengjie, Hu Xuanming, Chen Chaoming, Zhu Lvqun, Zhang Wenyan, Shen You, He Jirou
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University & Changzhou First People's Hospital, Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Acupuncture, Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210001, Jiangsu, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Sep 22;2020:5415813. doi: 10.1155/2020/5415813. eCollection 2020.
To observe the influence of the catgut-embedding method in Du Meridian acupoint on the mental and psychological state of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and analyze its possible mechanism.
According to the random number table, 60 patients with GERD were randomly divided into groups of acupoint catgut embedding and Western medicine, 30 cases in each group. The acupoint group was given catgut embedment in the positive reaction points along the Du Meridian, while the Western medicine group received lansoprazole tablet. They were both treated for six weeks. Scores of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ), Zung's Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Zung's Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Health-Related Quality of Life Scale for GERD (GERD-HRQL) were measured before and after treatment to analyze and evaluate the differences of symptom scores and mental and psychological conditions between the two groups.
(1) The scores of GerdQ, GERD-HRQL, SAS, and SDS in the two groups both significantly decreased after treatment ( < 0.05), and those of the acupoint group were much lower than the Western medicine group ( < 0.05). (2) The total effective rate was 90.00% in the acupoint group and 53.33% in the Western medicine group, with a statistically significant difference ( < 0.05). (3) The correlation coefficients between the GerdQ score and scores of SAS and SDS were 0.563 and 0.322, respectively, and those between the GERD-HRQL score and scores of SAS and SDS were, respectively, 0.506 and 0.435.
(1) The main symptoms of GERD patients, such as acid reflux and heartburn, mental and psychological condition, and quality of life, were all improved in the two groups, but the efficacy in the acupoint group is superior to that of the Western medicine group. (2) The clinical symptoms and scores of patients' quality of life are positively correlated with the degree of their anxiety and depression. (3) The acupoint catgut-embedding method can effectively regulate the anxiety and depressive symptoms of patients, which complements the efficacy of proton-pump inhibitors and benefits a wider range of population.
观察督脉穴位埋线法对胃食管反流病(GERD)患者精神心理状态的影响,并分析其可能机制。
按照随机数字表法,将60例GERD患者随机分为穴位埋线组和西药组,每组30例。穴位组在督脉循行线上阳性反应点埋线,西药组给予兰索拉唑片。两组均治疗6周。于治疗前后测量胃食管反流病问卷(GerdQ)、zung氏自评焦虑量表(SAS)、zung氏自评抑郁量表(SDS)及胃食管反流病健康相关生活质量量表(GERD-HRQL)评分,分析评价两组症状评分及精神心理状况的差异。
(1)两组治疗后GerdQ、GERD-HRQL、SAS及SDS评分均显著降低(P<0.05),且穴位组低于西药组(P<0.05)。(2)穴位组总有效率为90.00%,西药组为53.33%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(3)GerdQ评分与SAS、SDS评分的相关系数分别为0.563、0.322,GERD-HRQL评分与SAS、SDS评分的相关系数分别为0.506、0.435。
(1)两组GERD患者的反酸、烧心等主要症状、精神心理状况及生活质量均得到改善,但穴位组疗效优于西药组。(2)患者的临床症状及生活质量评分与焦虑、抑郁程度呈正相关。(3)穴位埋线法能有效调节患者的焦虑、抑郁症状,可补充质子泵抑制剂的疗效,使更多患者受益。