Eller College of Management, Department of Management and Organizations, University of Arizona.
Warrington College of Business, Department of Management, University of Florida.
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Oct;106(10):1517-1538. doi: 10.1037/apl0000838. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
Although leaders' daily work is inherently relational, it is possible that leaders can feel lonely and isolated from followers. Integrating theoretical ideas from regulatory loop models of loneliness with evolutionary perspectives of loneliness, we posit that daily leader loneliness (i.e., feelings of isolation stemming from one's followers) may prompt harmful self-perpetuating as well as beneficial self-correcting cycles of loneliness at work via different rumination processes. We expect that leader loneliness will relate to 2 forms of rumination after work-maladaptive affect-focused rumination and adaptive problem-solving pondering. We expect that each form of rumination will hinder or facilitate next-day work engagement and helping, which will then matter for subsequent leader loneliness. In a 10-day experience sampling investigation of 86 leaders, we found that daily leader loneliness exhibits a self-perpetuating pattern via affect-focused rumination because this type of rumination reduces next-day work engagement and helping. At the same time, daily leader loneliness exhibits a self-correcting pattern via problem-solving pondering, as this type of forward-thinking rumination facilitates work engagement and helping the next day. Furthermore, leader self-efficacy enhances the extent to which problem-solving pondering occurs when leaders feel lonely. In a supplemental experience sampling study with leaders and followers, we further show that daily leader loneliness is negatively related to followers' perceptions of leader effectiveness above and beyond more generalized loneliness. In summary, our work sheds theoretical and empirical light on the complex nature of leader loneliness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
虽然领导者的日常工作本质上是关系性的,但他们可能会感到孤独和与追随者隔绝。将孤独的调节回路模型和孤独的进化观点的理论观点结合起来,我们假设日常领导者孤独感(即,由于追随者而产生的孤立感)可能会通过不同的沉思过程引发有害的自我延续以及有益的自我纠正的孤独循环。我们期望领导者孤独感与工作后的两种沉思方式有关——适应性问题解决式沉思和适应性问题解决式沉思。我们期望每种沉思方式都会阻碍或促进第二天的工作投入和帮助,而这将对后续的领导者孤独感产生影响。在对 86 位领导者进行的为期 10 天的体验抽样调查中,我们发现,日常领导者孤独感通过关注情绪的沉思呈现出自我延续的模式,因为这种类型的沉思会降低第二天的工作投入和帮助。同时,日常领导者孤独感通过解决问题的沉思呈现出自我修正的模式,因为这种前瞻性的沉思有利于第二天的工作投入和帮助。此外,领导者的自我效能感增强了领导者感到孤独时进行解决问题式沉思的程度。在一项有领导者和追随者参与的补充体验抽样研究中,我们进一步表明,日常领导者孤独感与追随者对领导者效能的看法呈负相关,而不仅仅是更普遍的孤独感。总之,我们的工作为领导者孤独感的复杂性提供了理论和经验上的启示。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。