Department of Cardiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital and the Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Feb;30(2):225-232. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.08.023. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
With the recognised physiologic value of dual chamber pacing, there was, at the commencement of the 1980s, an intense search for sensors to enable ventricular pacemakers to alter the pulse repetition rate in response to physiologic demand. Manufacturers fell into two main groups; those who chose highly physiologic sensors often requiring special pacing leads and those whose sensors allowed a standard pacing lead. Thirteen (13) sensors for rate adaptive pacing progressed at least to human investigational studies. Eventually the activity sensor, which responded quickly to exercise, but not to emotional stimuli or pyrexia and used a standard lead would predominate, with all manufacturers eventually accepting what was the least physiologic sensor investigated. The activity-based rate response was not dependent on cardiac or pulmonary disease, which could nullify the response with many of the other sensors. Three (3) other sensors survived that period and are still available today; minute ventilation, closed loop stimulation and central venous temperature, with the first two incorporated with activity as dual sensor systems. This review will outline the development of all the sensors used for rate adaptive pacing.
鉴于双腔起搏的公认生理价值,在 20 世纪 80 年代初,人们强烈寻求传感器,以使心室起搏器能够根据生理需求改变脉冲重复率。制造商分为两大类; 一些选择了高度生理的传感器,这些传感器通常需要特殊的起搏导线,而另一些则使用标准的起搏导线。有 13 种(13 种)用于速率适应性起搏的传感器至少进展到了人体研究阶段。最终,对运动反应迅速但对情绪刺激或发热无反应且使用标准导联的活动传感器将占据主导地位,所有制造商最终都接受了调查的最不生理传感器。基于活动的心率反应不依赖于心脏或肺部疾病,这可能会使许多其他传感器的反应无效。有三个(3)其他传感器在那段时间幸存下来,至今仍在使用; 分钟通气量、闭环刺激和中心静脉温度,前两个与活动一起作为双传感器系统。这篇综述将概述用于速率适应性起搏的所有传感器的发展。