• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于“现场”数字设备分类的 COLLECTORS 分级量表。

The COLLECTORS ranking scale for 'at-scene' digital device triage.

机构信息

Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2021 Jan;66(1):179-189. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14582. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1111/1556-4029.14582
PMID:33034896
Abstract

As digital evidence now features prominently in many criminal investigations, such large volumes of requests for the forensic examination of devices has led to well publicized backlogs and delays. In an effort to cope, triage policies are frequently implemented in order to reduce the number of digital devices which are seized unnecessarily. Often first responders are tasked with performing triage at scene in order to decide whether any identified devices should be seized and submitted for forensic examination. In some cases, this is done with the assistance of software which allows device content to be "previewed"; however, in some cases, a first responder will triage devices using their judgment and experience alone, absent of knowledge of the devices content, referred to as "decision-based device triage" (DBDT). This work provides a discussion of the challenges first responders face when carrying out DBDT at scene. In response, the COLLECTORS ranking scale is proposed to help first responders carry out DBDT and to formalize this process in an effort to support quality control of this practice. The COLLECTORS ranking scale consists of 10 categories which first responders should rank a given device against. Each devices cumulative score should be queried against the defined "seizure thresholds" which offer support to first responders in assessing when to seize a device. To offer clarify, an example use-case involving the COLLECTORS ranking scale is included, highlighting its application when faced with multiple digital devices at scene.

摘要

随着数字证据在许多刑事调查中占据重要地位,对设备进行法医检查的大量请求导致了众所周知的积压和延迟。为了应对这种情况,通常会实施分类政策,以减少不必要扣押的数字设备数量。通常,第一响应者的任务是在现场进行分类,以决定是否应扣押和提交任何已识别的设备进行法医检查。在某些情况下,这是借助允许“预览”设备内容的软件来完成的;但是,在某些情况下,第一响应者将仅根据自己的判断力和经验对设备进行分类,而不了解设备的内容,这被称为“基于决策的设备分类”(DBDT)。这项工作讨论了第一响应者在现场进行 DBDT 时面临的挑战。作为回应,提出了 COLLECTORS 排名量表,以帮助第一响应者进行 DBDT,并使该过程正式化,以支持该实践的质量控制。COLLECTORS 排名量表由 10 个类别组成,第一响应者应根据这些类别对给定设备进行排名。应根据定义的“扣押阈值”查询每个设备的累计得分,该阈值为第一响应者评估何时扣押设备提供了支持。为了说明问题,包括了一个涉及 COLLECTORS 排名量表的示例用例,突出了在现场面对多个数字设备时如何应用该量表。

相似文献

1
The COLLECTORS ranking scale for 'at-scene' digital device triage.用于“现场”数字设备分类的 COLLECTORS 分级量表。
J Forensic Sci. 2021 Jan;66(1):179-189. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14582. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
2
Triaging digital device content at-scene:- Formalising the decision-making process.现场对数字设备内容进行分类:- 规范决策流程。
Sci Justice. 2022 Jan;62(1):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
3
Digital evidence and the crime scene.
Sci Justice. 2021 Nov;61(6):761-770. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.10.003. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
4
Digital forensics: an analytical crime scene procedure model (ACSPM).数字取证:一种分析性犯罪现场程序模型 (ACSPM)。
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Dec 10;233(1-3):244-56. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
5
6
Placing the suspect at a PC: A preliminary study involving fingerprints on keyboards and mice.将嫌疑人与个人电脑关联起来:一项涉及键盘和鼠标上指纹的初步研究。
Sci Justice. 2021 Jan;61(1):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
7
The use of medical knowledge in the crime investigation.医学知识在犯罪调查中的应用。
Wiad Lek. 2019;72(1):103-106.
8
When finding nothing may be evidence of something: Anti-forensics and digital tool marks.当一无所获可能成为某种证据时:反取证与数字工具痕迹
Sci Justice. 2019 Sep;59(5):565-572. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
9
Quantitative evaluation of the results of digital forensic investigations: a review of progress.数字取证调查结果的定量评估:进展综述
Forensic Sci Res. 2021 Feb 8;6(1):13-18. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2020.1837429.
10
Inter-regional digital forensic knowledge management: needs, challenges, and solutions.区域间数字取证知识管理:需求、挑战与解决方案。
J Forensic Sci. 2021 Mar;66(2):619-629. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14613. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
GAMEPLANS: A template for robust digital evidence strategy development.游戏计划:强大的数字证据策略制定模板。
J Forensic Sci. 2025 Jan;70(1):369-375. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15655. Epub 2024 Nov 7.