Novametrics, Duffield, Derbyshire, United Kingdom.
Swiss Centre for International Health, Basel, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 9;15(10):e0238776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238776. eCollection 2020.
Globally, increasing efforts have been made to hold duty-bearers to account for their commitments to improve reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (RMNCAH) over the past two decades, including via social accountability approaches: citizen-led, collective processes for holding duty-bearers to account. There have been many individual studies and several reviews of social accountability approaches but the implications of their findings to inform future accountability efforts are not clear. We addressed this gap by conducting a review of reviews in order to summarise the current evidence on social accountability for RMNCAH, identify factors contributing to intermediary outcomes and health impacts, and identify future research and implementation priorities. The review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42019134340). We searched eight databases and systematic review repositories and sought expert recommendations for published and unpublished reviews, with no date or language restrictions. Six reviews were analysed using narrative synthesis: four on accountability or social accountability approaches for RMNCAH, and two specifically examining perinatal mortality audits, from which we extracted information relating to community involvement in audits. Our findings confirmed that there is extensive and growing evidence for social accountability approaches, particularly community monitoring interventions. Few documented social accountability approaches to RMNCAH achieve transformational change by going beyond information-gathering and awareness-raising, and attention to marginalised and vulnerable groups, including adolescents, has not been well documented. Drawing generalisable conclusions about results was difficult, due to inconsistent nomenclature and gaps in reporting, particularly regarding objectives, contexts, and health impacts. Promising approaches for successful social accountability initiatives include careful tailoring to the social and political context, strategic planning, and multi-sectoral/multi-stakeholder approaches. Future primary research could advance the evidence by describing interventions and their results in detail and in their contexts, focusing on factors and processes affecting acceptability, adoption, and effectiveness.
在过去的二十年中,全球范围内为了让利益攸关方履行改善生殖、孕产妇、新生儿、儿童和青少年健康(RMNCAH)的承诺,做出了越来越多的努力,包括通过社会问责制方法:由公民领导的、对利益攸关方进行问责的集体过程。虽然已经有许多针对社会问责制方法的个别研究和几次综述,但它们的研究结果对未来问责工作的影响尚不清楚。为了填补这一空白,我们进行了一次综述研究,以总结当前关于 RMNCAH 的社会问责制的证据,确定促进中间结果和健康影响的因素,并确定未来的研究和实施重点。该综述已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO CRD42019134340)中进行了注册。我们在八个数据库和系统评价存储库中进行了检索,并征求了对已发表和未发表综述的专家建议,没有日期或语言限制。我们使用叙述性综合方法分析了六项综述:四项关于 RMNCAH 的问责制或社会问责制方法,两项专门审查围产期死亡率审计,从中我们提取了与社区参与审计有关的信息。我们的研究结果证实,社会问责制方法有广泛而不断增加的证据,特别是社区监测干预措施。很少有记录在案的 RMNCAH 社会问责制方法通过超越信息收集和提高认识以及关注边缘化和弱势群体,包括青少年,来实现变革性变化。由于报告中术语不一致和存在空白,特别是在目标、背景和健康影响方面,很难得出关于结果的可推广结论。成功的社会问责制倡议的有前途的方法包括仔细根据社会和政治背景进行定制、战略规划以及多部门/多利益攸关方方法。未来的主要研究可以通过详细描述干预措施及其在背景下的结果,并重点关注影响可接受性、采用和有效性的因素和过程,来推进证据。