Scott K, Jessani N, Qiu M, Bennett S
Health Systems Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolf Street, Baltimore, MA, USA.
Department of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolf Street, Baltimore, MA, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Nov 1;33(9):975-987. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy079.
Health policy and systems research (HPSR) is vital to guiding global institutions, funders, policymakers, activists and implementers in developing and enacting strategies to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. We undertook a multi-stage participatory process to identify priority research questions relevant to improving accountability within health systems. We conducted interviews (n = 54) and focus group discussions (n = 2) with policymakers from international and national bodies (ministries of health, other government agencies and technical support institutions) across the WHO regions. Respondents were asked to reflect on challenges and current policy discussions related to health systems accountability, and to identify their pressing research needs. We also conducted an overview of reviews (n = 34) to determine the current status of knowledge on health systems accountability and to identify any gaps. We extracted research questions from the policymaker interviews and focus groups (70 questions) and from the overview of reviews (112 questions), and synthesized these into 36 overarching questions. Using the online platform Co-Digital, we invited researchers from around the world to refine and then rank the questions according to research importance. The questions that emerged amongst the top priorities focused on political factors that mediate the adoption or effectiveness of accountability initiatives, processes and incentives that facilitate the acceptability of accountability mechanisms among frontline healthcare providers, and the national governance reforms and contexts that enhance provider accountability. The process revealed different underlying conceptions of social accountability and how best to promote it, with some researchers and policymakers focusing on specific interventions and others embracing a more systems-oriented approach to understanding accountability, the multiple forms that it can take, how these interact with each other and the importance of power and underlying social relations. The findings from this exercise identify HPSR funding priorities and future areas for evidence production and policy engagement.
卫生政策与系统研究(HPSR)对于指导全球机构、资助者、政策制定者、活动家及实施者制定和实施实现可持续发展目标的战略至关重要。我们开展了一个多阶段参与式过程,以确定与改善卫生系统问责制相关的优先研究问题。我们与来自世卫组织各区域国际和国家机构(卫生部、其他政府机构及技术支持机构)的政策制定者进行了访谈(n = 54)和焦点小组讨论(n = 2)。受访者被要求思考与卫生系统问责制相关的挑战和当前政策讨论,并确定他们迫切的研究需求。我们还对综述(n = 34)进行了概述,以确定卫生系统问责制的知识现状,并找出任何差距。我们从政策制定者访谈和焦点小组中提取了研究问题(70个问题),并从综述概述中提取了研究问题(112个问题),并将这些问题综合为36个总体问题。我们利用在线平台Co-Digital,邀请来自世界各地的研究人员对这些问题进行完善,然后根据研究重要性进行排序。排在最优先位置的问题聚焦于调解问责制举措采用或有效性的政治因素、促进一线医疗服务提供者接受问责制机制的流程和激励措施,以及加强提供者问责制的国家治理改革和背景。该过程揭示了社会问责制的不同潜在概念以及促进社会问责制的最佳方式,一些研究人员和政策制定者关注具体干预措施,而另一些人则采用更具系统性的方法来理解问责制、其可能采取的多种形式、这些形式如何相互作用以及权力和潜在社会关系的重要性。这项工作的结果确定了卫生政策与系统研究的资助重点以及证据生成和政策参与的未来领域。