• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇和新生儿健康服务决策中社区参与的制度化:来自102个国家卫生部的分析

Institutionalising community participation in decision-making in maternal and newborn health services in low-and middle-income countries: An analysis from 102 national health ministries.

作者信息

Cocoman Olive, Jackson Debra, Ruysen Harriet, Gilmore Brynne

机构信息

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and International Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, South Africa.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Sep 2;5(9):e0005139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005139. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0005139
PMID:40892881
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12404553/
Abstract

In 2024, 194 countries endorsed World Health Assembly Resolution (WHA77.2) to strengthen participation in health-related decision-making. Achieving this requires strong leadership to institutionalise community participation by embedding it into health system functions. However, efforts are often fragmented and short-term, hindering both sustainability and scalability. There is limited understanding of how well countries have institutionalised community participation in decision-making for quality maternal and newborn health services. A secondary analysis of maternal and newborn health survey data was conducted using responses from 102 Ministries of Health in low-and middle-income countries. The analysis assessed progress in adopting and implementing maternal and newborn health recommendations on community participation. A descriptive approach was used to summarise the frequency of reported community participation activities. Percentages were applied to describe the data, which was disaggregated by 2024-2025 World Bank classifications for income level, and fragile and conflict-affected settings. Country responses were categorised using Lasswell's Policy Cycle heuristic. The findings indicate substantial gaps in institutionalising community participation in maternal and newborn health. Only half of countries reported integrating participation into national plans, and just one-third into implementation. In 90% of countries, parent groups were reported to be either absent or lacking influence on policymaking. National research on community participation, essential for evidence-based decision-making, was rarely reported. Across all regions, countries had varied progress, reflecting a diverse and uneven landscape of community participation. Stronger efforts are required to institutionalise community participation across the maternal and newborn health policy cycle. Strengthening this integration will require clear metrics to track implementation, enabling more accurate assessments of progress and accountability. Identifying countries where institutionalisation is advancing can surface positive deviance cases. Studying these in-depth may reveal drivers and effective strategies for fostering community participation to guide the adaption and integration of successful approaches into national health systems.

摘要

2024年,194个国家认可了世界卫生大会第77.2号决议,以加强对卫生相关决策的参与。要实现这一目标,需要强有力的领导,通过将社区参与融入卫生系统功能,使其制度化。然而,相关努力往往零散且短期,这既阻碍了可持续性,也影响了可扩展性。对于各国在将社区参与制度化以提供优质孕产妇和新生儿保健服务决策方面的成效,人们了解有限。利用低收入和中等收入国家102个卫生部的回复,对孕产妇和新生儿健康调查数据进行了二次分析。该分析评估了在采纳和实施关于社区参与的孕产妇和新生儿健康建议方面的进展。采用描述性方法总结报告的社区参与活动的频率。使用百分比来描述数据,并按2024 - 2025年世界银行的收入水平分类以及脆弱和受冲突影响的地区进行分类。国家回复根据拉斯韦尔政策周期启发法进行分类。研究结果表明,在将社区参与制度化以保障孕产妇和新生儿健康方面存在巨大差距。只有一半的国家报告将参与纳入国家计划,仅有三分之一的国家将其纳入实施过程。在90%的国家,据报告家长团体要么不存在,要么对政策制定没有影响力。很少有国家报告开展关于社区参与的全国性研究,而这对于基于证据的决策至关重要。在所有地区,各国的进展各不相同,反映出社区参与的情况多样且不均衡。需要做出更大努力,在孕产妇和新生儿健康政策周期中使社区参与制度化。加强这种整合将需要明确的指标来跟踪实施情况,以便更准确地评估进展和问责情况。确定制度化进程正在推进的国家可以发现积极偏差案例。深入研究这些案例可能会揭示促进社区参与的驱动因素和有效策略,以指导将成功方法适应并融入国家卫生系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e18/12404553/b607a6043461/pgph.0005139.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e18/12404553/c1881a3a3ba6/pgph.0005139.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e18/12404553/b607a6043461/pgph.0005139.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e18/12404553/c1881a3a3ba6/pgph.0005139.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e18/12404553/b607a6043461/pgph.0005139.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Institutionalising community participation in decision-making in maternal and newborn health services in low-and middle-income countries: An analysis from 102 national health ministries.低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇和新生儿健康服务决策中社区参与的制度化:来自102个国家卫生部的分析
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Sep 2;5(9):e0005139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005139. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
8
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Relational community engagement within health interventions at varied outcome scales.在不同结果规模的健康干预措施中进行关系型社区参与。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jun 11;4(6):e0003193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003193. eCollection 2024.
2
Linking communities and health facilities to improve child health in low-resource settings: a systematic review.将社区和卫生机构联系起来以改善资源匮乏环境下的儿童健康:系统评价。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Jun 3;39(6):613-635. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae028.
3
Community engagement approaches for malaria prevention, control and elimination: a scoping review.
社区参与方法在疟疾预防、控制和消除中的应用:综述
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 15;14(2):e081982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081982.
4
Institutionalising community engagement for quality of care: moving beyond the rhetoric.将社区参与制度化,以提高护理质量:超越言辞。
BMJ. 2023 May 15;381:e072638. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072638.
5
Reducing maternal and neonatal mortality through integrated and sustainability-focused programming in Zambia.通过赞比亚以综合和可持续性为重点的规划来降低孕产妇和新生儿死亡率。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Dec 14;2(12):e0001162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001162. eCollection 2022.
6
What's in a name? Unpacking 'Community ' terminology in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: a scoping review.名称的含义是什么?生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康领域中“社区”术语的解析:范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Feb;8(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009423.
7
Community engagement in health systems interventions and research in conflict-affected countries: a scoping review of approaches.社区参与冲突影响国家卫生系统干预和研究:方法的范围综述。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2074131. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2074131.
8
Participation in primary health care through community-level health committees in Sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative synthesis.通过撒哈拉以南非洲地区社区层面的卫生委员会参与初级卫生保健:一项定性综合研究
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 19;22(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12730-y.
9
Implementation and effectiveness of continuous kangaroo mother care: a participatory action research protocol.实施和有效性的持续袋鼠式护理:参与式行动研究方案。
Int Breastfeed J. 2021 Mar 8;16(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13006-021-00367-3.
10
Do community scorecards improve utilisation of health services in community clinics: experience from a rural area of Bangladesh.社区评分卡能否提高社区诊所卫生服务的利用率:来自孟加拉国农村地区的经验。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Nov 2;19(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01266-5.