Zhang Y Z, Xiong P, Zhao H D, Chen Z C, Wei X Y, Liu Q, Chen F Y, Cheng Y, Hu J, Li S N, Yang J, Zhang Q
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Shanghai Haishen Medical Electronic Instrument co. LTD, Shanghai 200093, China.
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 7;55(10):957-961. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20200427-00338.
The aim of this study was to design and perform "Tap-hammer"system that can be used to elicit vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) in normal adults and to report the preliminary results of this system. A triggered Tap-hammer was designed, made and connected with an electric recording system, to form as a system for Tap-VEMP recording. Twenty healthy adult volunteers (7 males and 13 females, aged 20 to 37 years, 40 ears in total) were recruited for air-conducted sound VEMP (ACS-VEMP) and Tap-VEMP examinations. Waveforms and parameters of both VEMPs were recorded and analyzed. SPSS 22.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The response rates of ACS-, Tap-ocular VEMP (oVEMP) and ACS-, Tap-cervical VEMP (cVEMP) were both 100% (40/40). The mean±SD n1 latency, p1 latency, n1-p1 interval, amplitude, and asymmetry ratio (AR%) of Tap-oVEMP were (9.80±2.51)ms, (13.90±3.26)ms, (4.09±1.43)ms, (16.43±9.61)μV, (22.68±17.35)% respectively. The mean±SD p1 latency, n1 latency, p1-n1 interval, amplitude, and asymmetry ratio (AR%) of Tap-cVEMP were (13.26±2.07)ms, (21.84±2.89)ms, (8.58±2.10)ms, (457.65±274.94)μV, (20.42±13.46)% respectively. Both n1 latency and p1 latency of Tap-VEMPs were shorter than those in ACS-VEMPs (0.05). No statistical difference could be found between the two stimulation methods in the parameters of n1-p1 interval, amplitude, and asymmetry ratio(0.05). The Tap-hammer system can elicit VEMP responses in healthy young people. This system can be used as an alternative stimulation method for bone conduction VEMP.
本研究的目的是设计并运行一种“叩诊锤”系统,该系统可用于引出正常成年人的前庭诱发肌源性电位(VEMP),并报告该系统的初步结果。设计并制作了一个触发式叩诊锤,并将其与电记录系统相连,形成一个用于记录叩诊VEMP的系统。招募了20名健康成年志愿者(7名男性和13名女性,年龄20至37岁,共40只耳)进行气导声音VEMP(ACS-VEMP)和叩诊VEMP检查。记录并分析了两种VEMP的波形和参数。使用SPSS 22.0软件进行统计分析。ACS-、叩诊眼VEMP(oVEMP)和ACS-、叩诊颈VEMP(cVEMP)的反应率均为100%(40/40)。叩诊oVEMP的平均±标准差n1潜伏期、p1潜伏期、n1-p1间期、波幅和不对称率(AR%)分别为(9.80±2.51)ms、(13.90±3.26)ms、(4.09±1.43)ms、(16.43±9.61)μV、(22.68±17.35)%。叩诊cVEMP的平均±标准差p1潜伏期、n1潜伏期、p1-n1间期、波幅和不对称率(AR%)分别为(13.26±2.07)ms(21.84±2.89)ms、(8.58±2.10)ms、(457.65±274.94)μV、(20.42±13.46)%。叩诊VEMP的n1潜伏期和p1潜伏期均短于ACS-VEMP(P<0.05)。两种刺激方法在n1-p1间期、波幅和不对称率参数上无统计学差异(P>0.05)。叩诊锤系统可在健康年轻人中引出VEMP反应。该系统可作为骨传导VEMP的替代刺激方法。