• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导致乳腺癌患者持续行对侧预防性乳房切除术的因素:单一医疗体系中 1051 例乳房切除术的检查。

Factors contributing to persistent rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer patients: Examination of 1051 mastectomies across a single health system.

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Department of General Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Breast J. 2020 Dec;26(12):2341-2349. doi: 10.1111/tbj.14080. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1111/tbj.14080
PMID:33037675
Abstract

The American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) outlined definitive guidelines for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in 2016. Despite this, rates of CPM have remained steady. The objective of this study was to identify factors contributing to persistent over-delivery of CPM. Breast cancer patients across 8 hospitals in a single healthcare system from 2014 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided according to whether they received nonindicated CPMs versus other mastectomy types. Nonindicated CPM were those procedures not meeting ASBrS consensus guidelines for recommended patients. CPM rate was calculated for each year in the study period. Patient, disease, provider, and system level factors were obtained. Bivariate analysis was used to identify variables for inclusion in a backward multivariable model. A total of 1,051 patients were analyzed. Nonindicated CPM rates by year remained steady throughout the time period (P = .391). In multivariable regression, patient, disease, and provider level factors were associated with odds of undergoing CPM. Every unit increase in age was associated with a 4% reduction in odds of undergoing CPM (CI 0.941-0.986). Stage 3 breast cancer compared to stage 1 had 53% lower odds of CPM (CI 0.288-0.757). Implant-based breast reconstruction had 2.9-fold higher odds of CPM compared to no reconstruction (CI 1.476-5.551). No system level factors were statistically significant. CPM rates have not notably decreased since the ASBrS consensus statement with certain patient and provider factors impacting persistent overuse of CPM. These results inform oncologic and reconstructive providers of factors contributing to continued use of a nonindicated procedure.

摘要

美国乳腺外科学会 (ASBrS) 于 2016 年为预防性对侧乳房切除术 (CPM) 制定了明确的指南。尽管如此,CPM 的比率仍然保持稳定。本研究的目的是确定导致 CPM 过度使用的因素。回顾了单一医疗系统的 8 家医院的 2014 年至 2018 年的乳腺癌患者。根据患者是否接受了非指征性 CPM 与其他乳房切除术类型进行分组。非指征性 CPM 是指不符合 ASBrS 共识指南推荐患者的手术。计算了研究期间每年的 CPM 率。获得了患者、疾病、提供者和系统水平的因素。采用双变量分析确定纳入向后多变量模型的变量。共分析了 1051 例患者。整个研究期间,每年的非指征性 CPM 率保持稳定 (P =.391)。多变量回归显示,患者、疾病和提供者水平的因素与接受 CPM 的几率相关。年龄每增加一个单位,接受 CPM 的几率就会降低 4% (CI 0.941-0.986)。与 1 期相比,3 期乳腺癌接受 CPM 的几率降低了 53% (CI 0.288-0.757)。与无重建相比,基于植入物的乳房重建接受 CPM 的几率高 2.9 倍 (CI 1.476-5.551)。没有统计学意义的系统水平因素。自 ASBrS 共识声明以来,CPM 率并没有明显下降,某些患者和提供者因素影响了 CPM 的持续过度使用。这些结果为肿瘤学和重建提供者提供了导致继续使用非指征性手术的因素。

相似文献

1
Factors contributing to persistent rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer patients: Examination of 1051 mastectomies across a single health system.导致乳腺癌患者持续行对侧预防性乳房切除术的因素:单一医疗体系中 1051 例乳房切除术的检查。
Breast J. 2020 Dec;26(12):2341-2349. doi: 10.1111/tbj.14080. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
2
Are There Disparities in Breast Reconstruction After Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy?对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)后的乳房重建是否存在差异?
J Surg Res. 2024 Jun;298:277-290. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.03.010. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
3
Trends in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomies Before and After the American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Statement.美国乳腺外科学会共识声明发布前后对侧预防性乳房切除术的趋势。
J Surg Res. 2024 Nov;303:545-553. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.071. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
4
Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and the impact on breast reconstruction.对侧预防性乳房切除术的预测因素及其对乳房重建的影响。
Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(6):S153-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000099.
5
State Variation in the Receipt of a Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Women Who Received a Diagnosis of Invasive Unilateral Early-Stage Breast Cancer in the United States, 2004-2012.美国 2004-2012 年间接受单侧浸润性早期乳腺癌诊断的女性中,接受对侧预防性乳房切除术的情况存在州际差异。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):648-657. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0115.
6
Decreasing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates in average-risk women with unilateral breast cancer.降低单侧乳腺癌中平均风险女性的对侧预防性乳房切除术率。
Am J Surg. 2021 Jun;221(6):1172-1176. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.040. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
7
Trends of Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy at the time of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence.同侧乳腺癌复发时对侧预防性乳房切除术的趋势。
Am J Surg. 2022 Mar;223(3):533-537. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.12.009. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
8
The financial impact and drivers of hospital charges in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample hospital analysis.对侧预防性乳房切除术和重建术中医院收费的财务影响及驱动因素:一项全国住院患者样本医院分析
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Sep;165(2):301-310. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4315-4. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
9
Impact of breast reconstruction on the decision to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.乳房重建对接受对侧预防性乳房切除术决策的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;21(9):2934-40. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3712-8. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
10
Breast reconstruction in patients with personal and family history of breast cancer undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, a 10-year experience.有乳腺癌个人和家族史的患者行对侧预防性乳房切除术的乳房重建:10 年经验。
Acta Oncol. 2012 Sep;51(7):934-41. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.666000. Epub 2012 Mar 12.