Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Department of General Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Breast J. 2020 Dec;26(12):2341-2349. doi: 10.1111/tbj.14080. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
The American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) outlined definitive guidelines for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in 2016. Despite this, rates of CPM have remained steady. The objective of this study was to identify factors contributing to persistent over-delivery of CPM. Breast cancer patients across 8 hospitals in a single healthcare system from 2014 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided according to whether they received nonindicated CPMs versus other mastectomy types. Nonindicated CPM were those procedures not meeting ASBrS consensus guidelines for recommended patients. CPM rate was calculated for each year in the study period. Patient, disease, provider, and system level factors were obtained. Bivariate analysis was used to identify variables for inclusion in a backward multivariable model. A total of 1,051 patients were analyzed. Nonindicated CPM rates by year remained steady throughout the time period (P = .391). In multivariable regression, patient, disease, and provider level factors were associated with odds of undergoing CPM. Every unit increase in age was associated with a 4% reduction in odds of undergoing CPM (CI 0.941-0.986). Stage 3 breast cancer compared to stage 1 had 53% lower odds of CPM (CI 0.288-0.757). Implant-based breast reconstruction had 2.9-fold higher odds of CPM compared to no reconstruction (CI 1.476-5.551). No system level factors were statistically significant. CPM rates have not notably decreased since the ASBrS consensus statement with certain patient and provider factors impacting persistent overuse of CPM. These results inform oncologic and reconstructive providers of factors contributing to continued use of a nonindicated procedure.
美国乳腺外科学会 (ASBrS) 于 2016 年为预防性对侧乳房切除术 (CPM) 制定了明确的指南。尽管如此,CPM 的比率仍然保持稳定。本研究的目的是确定导致 CPM 过度使用的因素。回顾了单一医疗系统的 8 家医院的 2014 年至 2018 年的乳腺癌患者。根据患者是否接受了非指征性 CPM 与其他乳房切除术类型进行分组。非指征性 CPM 是指不符合 ASBrS 共识指南推荐患者的手术。计算了研究期间每年的 CPM 率。获得了患者、疾病、提供者和系统水平的因素。采用双变量分析确定纳入向后多变量模型的变量。共分析了 1051 例患者。整个研究期间,每年的非指征性 CPM 率保持稳定 (P =.391)。多变量回归显示,患者、疾病和提供者水平的因素与接受 CPM 的几率相关。年龄每增加一个单位,接受 CPM 的几率就会降低 4% (CI 0.941-0.986)。与 1 期相比,3 期乳腺癌接受 CPM 的几率降低了 53% (CI 0.288-0.757)。与无重建相比,基于植入物的乳房重建接受 CPM 的几率高 2.9 倍 (CI 1.476-5.551)。没有统计学意义的系统水平因素。自 ASBrS 共识声明以来,CPM 率并没有明显下降,某些患者和提供者因素影响了 CPM 的持续过度使用。这些结果为肿瘤学和重建提供者提供了导致继续使用非指征性手术的因素。