Department of Dermatology, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Feb;35(2):546-553. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16979. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for the diagnosis of skin diseases has shown promise in experimental settings but has not been yet tested in real-life conditions.
To assess the diagnostic performance and potential clinical utility of a 174-multiclass AI algorithm in a real-life telemedicine setting.
Prospective, diagnostic accuracy study including consecutive patients who submitted images for teledermatology evaluation. The treating dermatologist chose a single image to upload to a web application during teleconsultation. A follow-up reader study including nine healthcare providers (3 dermatologists, 3 dermatology residents and 3 general practitioners) was performed.
A total of 340 cases from 281 patients met study inclusion criteria. The mean (SD) age of patients was 33.7 (17.5) years; 63% (n = 177) were female. Exposure to the AI algorithm results was considered useful in 11.8% of visits (n = 40) and the teledermatologist correctly modified the real-time diagnosis in 0.6% (n = 2) of cases. The overall top-1 accuracy of the algorithm (41.2%) was lower than that of the dermatologists (60.1%), residents (57.8%) and general practitioners (49.3%) (all comparisons P < 0.05, in the reader study). When the analysis was limited to the diagnoses on which the algorithm had been explicitly trained, the balanced top-1 accuracy of the algorithm (47.6%) was comparable to the dermatologists (49.7%) and residents (47.7%) but superior to the general practitioners (39.7%; P = 0.049). Algorithm performance was associated with patient skin type and image quality.
A 174-disease class AI algorithm appears to be a promising tool in the triage and evaluation of lesions with patient-taken photographs via telemedicine.
人工智能(AI)算法在皮肤病诊断中的应用在实验环境中显示出了前景,但尚未在实际临床环境中进行测试。
评估一种 174 类 AI 算法在真实远程医疗环境中的诊断性能和潜在临床应用价值。
前瞻性诊断准确性研究,纳入连续接受远程皮肤病评估的患者。在远程会诊期间,治疗皮肤科医生选择一张图像上传到网络应用程序。随后进行了一项随访者研究,包括 9 名医疗保健提供者(3 名皮肤科医生、3 名皮肤科住院医师和 3 名全科医生)。
共有 281 名患者的 340 例病例符合研究纳入标准。患者的平均(SD)年龄为 33.7(17.5)岁;63%(n=177)为女性。在 11.8%(n=40)的就诊中,AI 算法结果的应用被认为是有用的,而远程皮肤科医生在 0.6%(n=2)的病例中正确修改了实时诊断。算法的整体 top-1 准确率(41.2%)低于皮肤科医生(60.1%)、住院医师(57.8%)和全科医生(49.3%)(所有比较 P<0.05,在随访者研究中)。当分析仅限于算法明确训练的诊断时,算法的平衡 top-1 准确率(47.6%)与皮肤科医生(49.7%)和住院医师(47.7%)相当,但优于全科医生(39.7%;P=0.049)。算法性能与患者皮肤类型和图像质量有关。
一种 174 种疾病类别的 AI 算法似乎是一种很有前途的工具,可用于通过远程医疗对患者拍摄的照片进行分诊和评估病变。