Suppr超能文献

磁共振成像(MRI)与计算机断层扫描(CT)在评估间皮瘤原发肿瘤体积方面的比较。

A comparison between MRI and CT in the assessment of primary tumour volume in mesothelioma.

作者信息

Tsim Selina, Cowell Gordon W, Kidd Andrew, Woodward Rosemary, Alexander Laura, Kelly Caroline, Foster John E, Blyth Kevin G

机构信息

Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen ElIzabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Imaging Department, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 2020 Dec;150:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.09.025. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Primary tumour staging in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) using Computed Tomography (CT) imaging is confounded by perception errors reflecting low spatial resolution between tumour and adjacent structures. Augmentation using perfusion CT is constrained by radiation dosage. In this study, we evaluated an alternative tumour staging method using perfusion-tuned Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with suspected MPM were recruited to a prospective observational study. All had MRI (T1-weighted, isotropic, contrast-enhanced 3-Tesla perfusion imaging) and CT (contrast-enhanced) pre-biopsy. Patients diagnosed with MPM underwent MRI and CT volumetry, with readers blinded to clinical data. MRI volumetry was semi-automated, using signal intensity limits from perfusion studies to grow tumour regions within a pleural volume. A similar CT method was not possible, therefore all visible tumour was manually segmented. MRI and CT volumes were compared (agreement, correlation, analysis time, reproducibility) and associations with survival examined using Cox regression.

RESULTS

58 patients were recruited and had MRI before biopsy. 31/58 were diagnosed with MPM and these scans were used for volumetry. Mean (SD) MRI and CT volumes were 370 cm and 302 cm, respectively. MRI volumes were larger (average bias 61.9 cm (SD 116), 95 % limits (-165.5 - 289 cm), moderately correlated with CT (r = 0.56, p = 0.002) and independently associated with survival (HR 4.03 (95 % CI 1.5-11.55), p = 0.006). CT volumes were not associated with survival, took longer to compute than MRI volumes (mean (SD) 151 (19) v 14 (2) minutes, p=<0.0001) and were less reproducible (inter-observer ICC 0.72 for CT, 0.96 for MRI).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI and CT generate different tumour volumes in MPM. In this study, MRI volumes were larger and were independently associated with survival. MRI volumetry was quicker and more reproducible than CT.

摘要

引言

在恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)中,使用计算机断层扫描(CT)成像进行原发性肿瘤分期时,由于肿瘤与相邻结构之间的空间分辨率较低而导致的感知误差会混淆分期结果。使用灌注CT进行增强扫描受到辐射剂量的限制。在本研究中,我们评估了一种使用灌注调谐磁共振成像(MRI)的替代肿瘤分期方法。

方法

连续招募疑似MPM的患者进行前瞻性观察研究。所有患者在活检前均接受了MRI(T1加权、各向同性、对比增强3特斯拉灌注成像)和CT(对比增强)检查。诊断为MPM的患者接受了MRI和CT容积测量,阅片者对临床数据不知情。MRI容积测量采用半自动方式,利用灌注研究中的信号强度极限在胸膜容积内勾勒肿瘤区域。由于无法对CT采用类似方法,因此所有可见肿瘤均手动分割。比较了MRI和CT容积(一致性、相关性、分析时间、可重复性),并使用Cox回归分析了与生存的相关性。

结果

招募了58例患者,活检前均接受了MRI检查。58例中有31例被诊断为MPM,这些扫描用于容积测量。MRI和CT容积的平均值(标准差)分别为370 cm³和302 cm³。MRI容积更大(平均偏差61.9 cm³(标准差116),95%界限(-165.5 - 289 cm³)),与CT中度相关(r = 0.56,p = 0.002),并与生存独立相关(风险比4.03(95%置信区间1.5 - 11.55),p = 0.006)。CT容积与生存无关,计算时间比MRI容积长(平均值(标准差)151(19)分钟对14(2)分钟,p < 0.0001),且可重复性较差(CT的观察者间组内相关系数为0.72,MRI为0.96)。

结论

MRI和CT在MPM中生成的肿瘤容积不同。在本研究中,MRI容积更大且与生存独立相关。MRI容积测量比CT更快且更具可重复性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验