Suppr超能文献

耳鸣研究和临床应用问卷

Tinnitus Questionnaires for Research and Clinical Use.

机构信息

Veterans Affairs (VA) RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2021;51:403-418. doi: 10.1007/7854_2020_175.

Abstract

The lack of an objective measure of tinnitus has led to self-report questionnaires as the best option to evaluate tinnitus symptoms and quantify the degree to which quality of life is negatively impacted. There are many tinnitus questionnaires to choose from and it can be difficult to decide which one is best. From an evidence-based perspective, knowing how the questionnaire is designed, including its intended purpose, can help determine if it is appropriate or not to use. For example, a questionnaire designed to screen for the presence or absence of tinnitus should not be used as an outcome measure to answer questions about treatment effectiveness. Often, using more than one questionnaire is preferable to relying on just one. This chapter will review important factors to consider when selecting a questionnaire for research purposes and/or routine clinical care.

摘要

由于缺乏对耳鸣的客观衡量标准,自陈式问卷成为评估耳鸣症状和量化生活质量受负面影响程度的最佳选择。有许多耳鸣问卷可供选择,很难确定哪一个是最好的。从循证的角度来看,了解问卷的设计方式,包括其目的,可以帮助确定是否适合使用。例如,设计用于筛查耳鸣是否存在的问卷不应用作回答治疗效果问题的结果衡量标准。通常,使用多个问卷比仅依赖一个问卷更好。本章将回顾在研究目的和/或常规临床护理中选择问卷时需要考虑的重要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验