• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耳科学中的调查问卷:一项系统映射综述

Questionnaires in otology: a systematic mapping review.

作者信息

Viergever Koen, Kraak Jeroen T, Bruinewoud Els M, Ket Johannes C F, Kramer Sophia E, Merkus Paul

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Ear & Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 20;10(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01659-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-021-01659-9
PMID:33879248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8059288/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable tools in assessing the quality of health care from a patient perspective and are increasingly used by otologists. However, selecting the right questionnaire has proven to be a difficult and time-consuming task. To facilitate this process, we will provide a comprehensive overview of existing questionnaires.

METHODS

A systematic literature search has been conducted on August 26, 2019, using the EMBASE and PubMed medical databases. 13,345 unique records were extracted. Questionnaires addressing any otologic complaint (tinnitus, hearing loss, earache, otorrhoea, and ear-related pressure sensation, vertigo, itch, or dysgeusia) were identified. All questionnaires were evaluated for eligibility by two independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were adult population, closed-ended questions, English language of the questionnaire, and the availability of the original article describing the development of the instrument or a validation paper describing the validation process written in English.

OBJECTIVE

Create a comprehensive overview of all validated closed-ended otology questionnaires for adults and demonstrate their basic characteristics.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The number of questionnaires in English literature for the adult population, subdivided per symptom and target population.

RESULTS

A total of 155 unique questionnaires were selected: 33 tinnitus questionnaires, 23 vertigo questionnaires, 84 hearing loss questionnaires, and 15 multiple complaint questionnaires. A protocol for further questionnaire comparison is presented.

DISCUSSION

Two separate sequential searches were needed to identify unique questionnaires and to identify their development/validation paper. Although many ear diseases create multiple symptoms, the majority of the questionnaires were symptom specific.

CONCLUSION

Many questionnaires concerning ear-related symptoms exist and predominantly concern hearing loss, vertigo, or tinnitus. Only a few questionnaires cover the multiple complaints that ear diseases can create. The presented overview is the most comprehensive overview of otology questionnaires in literature to date. It will serve as a basis for questionnaire selection by professionals and could serve as a protocol for questionnaire selection in other fields.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42017058155.

摘要

背景

患者报告结局测量(PROMs)是从患者角度评估医疗质量的宝贵工具,并且越来越多地被耳科医生使用。然而,选择合适的问卷已被证明是一项困难且耗时的任务。为了便于这一过程,我们将提供现有问卷的全面概述。

方法

于2019年8月26日使用EMBASE和PubMed医学数据库进行了系统的文献检索。提取了13345条独特记录。确定了针对任何耳科疾病(耳鸣、听力损失、耳痛、耳漏、耳部相关压迫感、眩晕、瘙痒或味觉障碍)的问卷。由两名独立研究人员对所有问卷进行资格评估。纳入标准为成年人群、封闭式问题、问卷语言为英语,以及有描述该工具开发的原始文章或用英语撰写的描述验证过程的验证论文。

目的

创建一份针对成人的所有经过验证的封闭式耳科问卷的全面概述,并展示其基本特征。

主要结局指标

英文文献中针对成年人群的问卷数量,按症状和目标人群细分。

结果

共选择了155份独特问卷:33份耳鸣问卷、23份眩晕问卷、84份听力损失问卷和15份多种症状问卷。提出了进一步比较问卷的方案。

讨论

需要进行两次单独的顺序检索来识别独特问卷并识别其开发/验证论文。尽管许多耳部疾病会产生多种症状,但大多数问卷是针对特定症状的。

结论

存在许多关于耳部相关症状的问卷,主要涉及听力损失、眩晕或耳鸣。只有少数问卷涵盖了耳部疾病可能产生的多种症状。所呈现的概述是迄今为止文献中最全面的耳科问卷概述。它将作为专业人员选择问卷的基础,并可作为其他领域问卷选择的方案。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42017058155。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ee/8059288/43decbd1bf46/13643_2021_1659_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ee/8059288/43decbd1bf46/13643_2021_1659_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ee/8059288/43decbd1bf46/13643_2021_1659_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Questionnaires in otology: a systematic mapping review.耳科学中的调查问卷:一项系统映射综述
Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 20;10(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01659-9.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的耳道清理(耳部清洁)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub3.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus.银杏叶治疗耳鸣。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 16;11(11):CD013514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013514.pub2.
9
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

引用本文的文献

1
Globally applicable solution to hearing loss screening: a diagnostic accuracy study of tablet-based audiometry.全球适用的听力损失筛查解决方案:基于平板电脑的听力测定诊断准确性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 May 22;15(5):e097550. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097550.
2
Refinement and Validation of a New Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Hearing Loss (My Hearing PREM).一种新的听力损失患者报告体验测量方法(我的听力患者报告体验测量法,My Hearing PREM)的完善与验证
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70225. doi: 10.1111/hex.70225.
3
Ambulatory autonomic nervous system activity in relation to hearing impairment.

本文引用的文献

1
Communication Scale for Older Adults (CSOA).老年人沟通量表(CSOA)
J Am Acad Audiol. 1997 Jun;8(3):203-17.
2
Making hearing impairment functionally relevant: linkages with hearing disability and handicap.使听力障碍具有功能相关性:与听力残疾和障碍的联系。
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990;476:226-31. doi: 10.3109/00016489109127283.
与听力障碍相关的动态自主神经系统活动
Psychophysiology. 2025 Jan;62(1):e14723. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14723. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
4
Development of the First Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM) for Hearing Loss in Audiology Care-My Hearing PREM.开发用于听力学护理的首个患者报告的听力损失体验测量工具(PREM)-我的听力 PREM。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70088. doi: 10.1111/hex.70088.
5
Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Tinnitus Outcome Measurement Instruments-A Scoping Review.耳鸣结局测量工具的最小临床重要差异——一项范围综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 15;12(22):7117. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227117.
6
Cross-Cultural Translation and Adaptation of the Consumer Ear Disease Risk Assessment (CEDRA) Questionnaire in Danish.消费者耳部疾病风险评估(CEDRA)问卷的丹麦语跨文化翻译与改编
Audiol Res. 2023 Nov 2;13(6):859-870. doi: 10.3390/audiolres13060075.
7
The International Standard Set of Outcome Measures for the Assessment of Hearing in People with Osteogenesis Imperfecta.《成骨不全症患者听力评估的国际通用结局指标集》。
Otol Neurotol. 2023 Aug 1;44(7):e449-e455. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003921. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
8
Listening Effort in Quiet and Noisy Environments in the Daily Life of Adults With Hearing Aids: An Extended Version of the Effort Assessment Scale (EEAS).助听人士日常生活中的安静环境和噪声环境下的聆听努力:努力评估量表(EEAS)的扩展版。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231176320. doi: 10.1177/23312165231176320.
9
Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Using Investigational Medicines for the Inner Ear: Previous Trial Outcomes Should Inform Future Trial Design.使用内耳研究药物预防噪声性听力损失:先前试验结果应指导未来试验设计。
Antioxid Redox Signal. 2022 Jun;36(16-18):1171-1202. doi: 10.1089/ars.2021.0166. Epub 2021 Oct 4.