Canevello Amy, Crocker Jennifer
Department of Psychological Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States.
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 17;11:538165. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.538165. eCollection 2020.
The compassionate goals scale was developed to assess the intentions underlying prosocial behaviors. Over the past 10 years, it has been shown to predict prosociality. However, research has not yet examined how compassionate goals relate to other measures of prosocial orientations or demonstrated that compassionate goals predict unique variance beyond them. Three studies addressed this shortcoming in the existing literature. Across studies, participants completed measures of compassionate goals, compassionate love, communal orientation, communion, unmitigated communion, and empathic concern. The participants also reported giving to strangers (study 1) and giving to close others (study 2). Study 3 was dyadic in nature-the participants reported their reasons for giving to friends and gratitude, and friends reported their gratitude toward the participants. Despite strong correlations between the compassionate goals scale and other prosocial orientation measures, compassionate goals items are empirically distinct from items assessing other prosocial orientations. The compassionate goals measure accounts for unique variance in giving, reasons for giving, and gratitude. Path analyses support a dyadic process-that compassionate goals predict more other-focused reasons for giving, which then predict friends' gratitude toward the participants. While the compassionate goals measure does overlap with other well-established and commonly used measures of prosocial orientation measures, it accounts for unique variance in giving-related outcomes, suggesting that intentions are an important aspect of prosocial orientations.
同情目标量表旨在评估亲社会行为背后的意图。在过去10年中,该量表已被证明能够预测亲社会行为。然而,研究尚未考察同情目标与亲社会取向的其他衡量指标之间的关系,也未证明同情目标能够预测超出这些指标的独特方差。三项研究弥补了现有文献中的这一不足。在各项研究中,参与者完成了同情目标、同情之爱、集体取向、交融、过度交融和共情关注的测量。参与者还报告了向陌生人捐赠的情况(研究1)以及向亲密他人捐赠的情况(研究2)。研究3本质上是二元的——参与者报告了向朋友捐赠的原因和感激之情,朋友则报告了对参与者的感激之情。尽管同情目标量表与其他亲社会取向测量指标之间存在很强的相关性,但同情目标项目在实证上与评估其他亲社会取向的项目不同。同情目标测量解释了捐赠、捐赠原因和感激之情方面的独特方差。路径分析支持了一个二元过程——同情目标预测了更多以他人为中心的捐赠原因,进而预测了朋友对参与者的感激之情。虽然同情目标测量确实与其他成熟且常用的亲社会取向测量指标存在重叠,但它解释了与捐赠相关结果中的独特方差,这表明意图是亲社会取向的一个重要方面。