• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西南食物社区:理解粮食安全项目中的系统性变革及其相关挑战和成功。

South West Food Community: understanding systemic change, and its associated challenges and successes, among food security projects.

机构信息

School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Western Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020 Dec;44(6):493-501. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13046. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1111/1753-6405.13046
PMID:33044798
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The South West Food Community (SWFC) project (2018) aimed to identify initiatives working to support food security in the South West region of Western Australia, and to enhance how these initiatives functioned as a system. The SWFC project used a Systemic Innovation Lab approach that, prior to this study, had not been evaluated. This evaluation aimed to: i) measure system transitions (changes) to initiatives; and ii) understand the challenges and successes associated with system transitions.

METHODS

SWFC initiative leaders (n=46) such as directors, managers or coordinators, volunteers or committee members were invited to participate in this evaluation. Fifteen stakeholders completed the telephone interviews (32% response rate).

RESULTS

Twenty-five desirable changes in practice were observed. Challenge and success statements determined themes of 'participation' and 'bureaucracy'. Participation sub-themes included: limited time; poor initiative attendance; community support; organisational support; and effective partnerships. Bureaucracy sub-themes included: regulation or policy requirements; limited resources; and funding opportunities.

CONCLUSION

The Australian-first SWFC project has the capacity to support region-to-region comparisons; this evaluation increases evidence for scaling to other regions. Implications for public health: This approach can be used to increase collaboration between initiatives, support resource-sharing between organisations and enhance policies (at local government level) to support food security.

摘要

目的

西南食品社区(SWFC)项目(2018 年)旨在确定在西澳大利亚州西南部地区支持粮食安全的举措,并增强这些举措作为一个系统的运作方式。SWFC 项目采用了系统创新实验室方法,在此之前,这种方法尚未经过评估。这项评估旨在:i)衡量各项举措的系统转变(变化);ii)了解与系统转变相关的挑战和成功。

方法

SWFC 倡议的领导者(n=46),如主任、经理或协调员、志愿者或委员会成员,被邀请参加此次评估。15 名利益相关者完成了电话访谈(32%的回应率)。

结果

观察到 25 个实践中理想的变化。挑战和成功的陈述确定了“参与”和“官僚主义”的主题。参与的子主题包括:时间有限;倡议参与度低;社区支持;组织支持;以及有效的伙伴关系。官僚主义的子主题包括:法规或政策要求;资源有限;以及资金机会。

结论

澳大利亚首创的 SWFC 项目有能力支持区域间的比较;这项评估增加了向其他地区推广的证据。对公共卫生的影响:这种方法可用于增加倡议之间的合作,支持组织之间的资源共享,并加强支持粮食安全的政策(在地方政府层面)。

相似文献

1
South West Food Community: understanding systemic change, and its associated challenges and successes, among food security projects.西南食物社区:理解粮食安全项目中的系统性变革及其相关挑战和成功。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020 Dec;44(6):493-501. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13046. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
2
Food community: Understanding community needs for a food security website to support rural and remote Western Australians.食品社区:了解社区对支持西澳大利亚农村和偏远地区食品安全网站的需求。
Health Promot J Austr. 2021 Oct;32 Suppl 2:283-291. doi: 10.1002/hpja.433. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
South West Food Community: how government and community initiatives are supporting systemic change towards enhanced food security.西南食品社区:政府和社区倡议如何支持增强粮食安全的系统性变革。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020 Apr;44(2):129-136. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12975. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
4
South West Food Community: A Place-Based Pilot Study to Understand the Food Security System.西南食物社区:一个基于地点的试点研究,以了解粮食安全系统。
Nutrients. 2019 Mar 29;11(4):738. doi: 10.3390/nu11040738.
5
Bridging barriers to advance multisector approaches to improve food security, nutrition and population health in Nepal: transdisciplinary perspectives.跨越障碍,推进多部门方法,改善尼泊尔的粮食安全、营养和人口健康:跨学科视角。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 18;19(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7204-4.
6
Local evidenced-based policy options to improve food security in South Australia: the use of local knowledge in policy development.改善南澳大利亚州粮食安全的本地循证政策选择:在政策制定中利用本地知识。
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Aug;15(8):1497-502. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011003260. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
7
Strengthening food systems with remote Indigenous Australians: stakeholders' perspectives.与澳大利亚偏远地区原住民共同加强粮食系统:利益相关者的观点
Health Promot Int. 2018 Feb 1;33(1):38-48. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw047.
8
Local Challenges and Successes Associated with Transitioning to Sustainable Food System Practices for a West Australian Context: Multi-Sector Stakeholder Perceptions.向澳大利亚西部的可持续食物系统实践转型的地方挑战和成功:多部门利益相关者的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 10;16(11):2051. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16112051.
9
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
10
A mixed-methods study to determine the impact of COVID-19 on food security, food access and supply in regional Australia for consumers and food supply stakeholders.一项混合方法研究,旨在确定 COVID-19 对澳大利亚地区消费者和食品供应利益相关者的粮食安全、粮食获取和供应的影响。
Nutr J. 2022 Mar 20;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12937-022-00770-4.