EviMed Research Group, LLC, Goshen, MA.
OptiStatim, LLC, Longmeadow, MA.
Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):1587-1594. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004525.
Most patients requiring mechanical ventilation only require it for a short term (< 4 d of mechanical ventilation). Those undergoing prolonged acute mechanical ventilation (≥ 4 d mechanical ventilation) represent a select cohort who face significant morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization. Using administrative codes, we identified prolonged acute mechanical ventilation and short-term mechanical ventilation patients and compared their baseline characteristics, hospital events, and hospital outcomes.
Retrospective cohort.
Seven-hundred eighty-seven acute care hospitals, United States, contributing data to Premier database, 2014-2018.
Patients on mechanical ventilation.
None.
Among 691,961 patients meeting the enrollment criteria, 266,374 (38.5%) received prolonged acute mechanical ventilation. At baseline, patients on prolonged acute mechanical ventilation were similar to short-term mechanical ventilation in age (years: 62.0 ± 15.8 prolonged acute mechanical ventilation vs 61.7 ± 17.2 short-term mechanical ventilation), gender (males: 55.6% prolonged acute mechanical ventilation vs 53.9% short-term mechanical ventilation), and race (white: 69.1% prolonged acute mechanical ventilation vs 72.4% short-term mechanical ventilation). The prolonged acute mechanical ventilation group had a higher comorbidity burden than short-term mechanical ventilation (mean Charlson Score 3.5 ± 2.7 vs 3.1 ± 2.7). The prevalence of vasopressors (50.3% vs 36.9%), dialysis (19.4% vs 10.3%), severe sepsis (20.3% vs 10.3%), and septic shock (33.5% vs 15.9%) was higher in prolonged acute mechanical ventilation than short-term mechanical ventilation. Hospital mortality (29.75% vs 21.1%), combined mortality, or discharge to hospice (37.2% vs 25.3%), extubation failure (12.3% vs 6.1%), tracheostomy (21.6% vs 4.5%), development of Clostridium difficile (4.5% vs 1.7%), and incidence density of ventilator-associated pneumonia (2.4/1,000 patient-days vs 0.6/1,000 patient-days) were all higher in the setting of prolonged acute mechanical ventilation than short-term mechanical ventilation. Median (interquartile range) post mechanical ventilation onset length of stay (13 [8-20] vs 4 d [1-8 d]) and hospital costs ($55,014 [$35,051-$88,007] vs $20,120 [$12,071-$34,915] were higher in prolonged acute mechanical ventilation than short-term mechanical ventilation.
Over one-third of all hospitalized patients on mechanical ventilation require it for greater than or equal to 4 days. Prolonged acute mechanical ventilation patients exhibit a higher burden of both chronic and acute illness and experience higher rates than those on short-term mechanical ventilation of hospital-acquired complications and worse clinical and economic outcomes.
大多数需要机械通气的患者只需要短期(<4 天机械通气)机械通气。那些需要长时间接受急性机械通气(≥4 天机械通气)的患者代表了一个特定的群体,他们面临着严重的发病率、死亡率和资源利用。我们使用管理代码确定了需要长时间接受急性机械通气和短期机械通气的患者,并比较了他们的基线特征、医院事件和医院结局。
回顾性队列研究。
2014-2018 年,美国向 Premier 数据库提供数据的 787 家急性护理医院。
接受机械通气的患者。
无。
在符合纳入标准的 691961 名患者中,266374 名(38.5%)接受了长时间的急性机械通气。在基线时,接受长时间急性机械通气的患者与短期机械通气的患者在年龄(岁:62.0±15.8 长时间急性机械通气 vs. 61.7±17.2 短期机械通气)、性别(男性:55.6%长时间急性机械通气 vs. 53.9%短期机械通气)和种族(白人:69.1%长时间急性机械通气 vs. 72.4%短期机械通气)方面相似。长时间急性机械通气组的合并症负担高于短期机械通气组(平均 Charlson 评分 3.5±2.7 与 3.1±2.7)。长时间急性机械通气患者中血管加压药(50.3% vs. 36.9%)、透析(19.4% vs. 10.3%)、严重脓毒症(20.3% vs. 10.3%)和感染性休克(33.5% vs. 15.9%)的患病率更高。长时间急性机械通气患者的院内死亡率(29.75% vs. 21.1%)、死亡或出院至临终关怀(37.2% vs. 25.3%)、拔管失败(12.3% vs. 6.1%)、气管切开术(21.6% vs. 4.5%)、艰难梭菌感染(4.5% vs. 1.7%)和呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率密度(2.4/1000 患者日 vs. 0.6/1000 患者日)均高于短期机械通气。长时间急性机械通气后机械通气开始后住院时间(13[8-20]天 vs. 4 天[1-8 天])和住院费用(55014 美元[35051-88007 美元] vs. 20120 美元[12071-34915 美元])中位数(四分位距)均高于短期机械通气。
超过三分之一的所有接受机械通气的住院患者需要机械通气的时间大于或等于 4 天。长时间接受急性机械通气的患者表现出更高的慢性和急性疾病负担,与接受短期机械通气的患者相比,他们发生医院获得性并发症和临床结局恶化的风险更高。