• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮左心耳封堵安全性的性别分层分析。

Sex-stratified analysis of the safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 1;97(5):885-892. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29282. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.29282
PMID:33048417
Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND

There is insufficient current evidence about whether sex impacts outcomes of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). The aim of this study was to investigate the association between sex and short-term outcomes of LAAO.

METHODS

Patients who were hospitalized and underwent LAAO from October 2015 to December 2017 in the National Readmission Database were queried. The primary endpoint of interest was major in-hospital adverse events. Secondary endpoints included, 30-day readmission rate, nonhome discharge, and cost of hospitalization. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to compare the outcomes among women and men.

RESULTS

A total of 9,281 patients were included in the current analysis [women = 3,659 (39%); men = 5,622 (61%)]. Comparing women to men, women had lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus (30.6% vs 35.7%, p < .01), heart failure (28.6% vs 30.8%, p = .03), vascular disease (55.5% vs 69.6%, p < .01) and renal failure (18.3% vs 21.2%, p < .01), and higher CHA DS VASc score (5 [IQR4-6] vs 4 [IQR3-6], p < .01). After propensity-score matching, women had higher rate of major in-hospital adverse events (2.8% vs 1.9%; p < .01), and nonhome discharges (11.4% vs 6.7%; p < .01). Additionally, 30-day readmission rate was higher among women (10% vs 8.6%, p = .03).

CONCLUSION

Among hospitalized patients undergoing LAAO, women carry higher risk for major in-hospital adverse events, nonhome discharge, and 30-day readmission rates.

摘要

目的和背景

目前关于性别是否影响经皮左心耳封堵术(LAAO)的结果的证据不足。本研究的目的是调查性别与 LAAO 短期结果之间的关系。

方法

从 2015 年 10 月至 2017 年 12 月,在美国国家再入院数据库中查询因 LAAO 住院的患者。主要研究终点为主要院内不良事件。次要终点包括 30 天再入院率、非家庭出院率和住院费用。采用倾向评分匹配(1:1)比较女性和男性的结局。

结果

本研究共纳入 9281 例患者[女性 3659 例(39%);男性 5622 例(61%)]。与男性相比,女性糖尿病患病率较低(30.6%比 35.7%,p < 0.01),心力衰竭(28.6%比 30.8%,p = 0.03),血管疾病(55.5%比 69.6%,p < 0.01)和肾功能衰竭(18.3%比 21.2%,p < 0.01),CHA2DS2-VASc 评分较高(5 [四分位距 4-6] 比 4 [四分位距 3-6],p < 0.01)。经过倾向评分匹配后,女性主要院内不良事件发生率较高(2.8%比 1.9%;p < 0.01),非家庭出院率较高(11.4%比 6.7%;p < 0.01)。此外,女性 30 天再入院率较高(10%比 8.6%,p = 0.03)。

结论

在接受 LAAO 的住院患者中,女性发生主要院内不良事件、非家庭出院和 30 天再入院的风险较高。

相似文献

1
Sex-stratified analysis of the safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion.经皮左心耳封堵安全性的性别分层分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 1;97(5):885-892. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29282. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
2
Outcomes and predictors of readmission after implantation of a percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion device in the United States: A propensity score-matched analysis from The National Readmission Database.美国经皮左心耳封堵装置植入术后再入院的结果和预测因素:来自全国再入院数据库的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Nov;32(11):2961-2970. doi: 10.1111/jce.15247. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
3
Combined atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion procedure in the United States: a propensity score matched analysis from 2016-2019 national readmission database.美国联合心房颤动消融和左心耳封堵术:2016-2019 年全国再入院数据库的倾向性评分匹配分析。
Europace. 2023 Feb 16;25(2):390-399. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac181.
4
Sex Differences in Procedural Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Insights From the NCDR LAAO Registry.左心耳封堵术患者的手术结局的性别差异:来自 NCDR LAAO 注册研究的见解。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Nov 1;6(11):1275-1284. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.3021.
5
Sex-related differences in outcome after left atrial appendage occlusion: Insights from Europe and the EWOLUTION registry.左心耳封堵术后结局的性别差异:来自欧洲和 EWOLUTION 注册研究的启示。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Aug;102(2):283-292. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30759. Epub 2023 Jul 2.
6
Association of Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion With Subsequent Stroke and Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.心脏手术后外科左心耳封堵与随后的中风和死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2018 May 22;319(20):2116-2126. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6024.
7
Adverse events and stroke prevention by interventional left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with low CHA DS -VASc score-results from the multicenter German LAARGE registry.经介入左心耳封堵术预防低 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分患者的不良事件和中风-来自多中心德国 LAARGE 注册研究的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun;99(7):2064-2070. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30165. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
8
Left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in diabetes mellitus patients with atrial fibrillation: Long-term results.左心耳封堵术预防糖尿病合并心房颤动患者卒中:长期结果。
J Diabetes. 2019 Jan;11(1):75-82. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12824. Epub 2018 Aug 12.
9
Thirty-day readmission rate of same-day discharge protocol after left atrial appendage occlusion: A propensity score-matched analysis from the National Readmission Database.左心耳封堵术后当日出院方案的30天再入院率:来自国家再入院数据库的倾向评分匹配分析。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Nov;19(11):1819-1825. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.07.006. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
10
Clinical Outcomes Associated With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation.左心耳封堵与直接口服抗凝药在房颤中的临床结局比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 11;14(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.051.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation in the United States based on sex.基于性别的美国无导线起搏器植入结果。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Aug;68(5):1027-1033. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01936-2. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
2
Gender differences in outcomes after left atrial appendage closure with Watchman FLX device: insights from the Italian-FLX registry.使用Watchman FLX装置进行左心耳封堵术后的结局性别差异:来自意大利-FLX注册研究的见解
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 25;11:1419018. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1419018. eCollection 2024.
3
The "Product of a Village": FDA as a Partner in Evidence Generation.
“乡村产品”:作为证据生成合作伙伴的美国食品药品监督管理局
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Jan 2;2(1):100561. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100561. eCollection 2023 Jan-Feb.
4
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Current Advances and Remaining Challenges.左心耳封堵术:当前进展与尚存挑战
JACC Adv. 2022 Nov 16;1(5):100136. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100136. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Left atrial appendage occlusion should be offered only to select atrial fibrillation patients.左心耳封堵术仅应提供给特定的房颤患者。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 Aug 22;3(4):448-454. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.07.001. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
Fifteen-Year Trends in Incidence of Cardiogenic Shock Hospitalization and In-Hospital Mortality in the United States.美国心源牲休克住院发病率和住院病死率 15 年变化趋势
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e021061. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021061. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
7
Index Admission and Thirty-Day Readmission Outcomes of Patients With Cancer Presenting With STEMI.癌症合并 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的入院和 30 天再入院结局。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Feb;35:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 Apr 16.