• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PEPPER 自适应推注剂量顾问和安全系统的安全性和可行性:一项随机对照研究。

Safety and Feasibility of the PEPPER Adaptive Bolus Advisor and Safety System: A Randomized Control Study.

机构信息

Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Diabetes, Endocrinology and Nutrition Unit, Hospital Universitari Dr. Josep Trueta, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona, Girona, Spain.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Mar;23(3):175-186. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0301.

DOI:10.1089/dia.2020.0301
PMID:33048581
Abstract

The Patient Empowerment through Predictive Personalized Decision Support (PEPPER) system provides personalized bolus advice for people with type 1 diabetes. The system incorporates an adaptive insulin recommender system (based on case-based reasoning, an artificial intelligence methodology), coupled with a safety system, which includes predictive glucose alerts and alarms, predictive low-glucose suspend, personalized carbohydrate recommendations, and dynamic bolus insulin constraint. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the PEPPER system compared to a standard bolus calculator. This was an open-labeled multicenter randomized controlled crossover study. Following 4-week run-in, participants were randomized to PEPPER/Control or Control/PEPPER in a 1:1 ratio for 12 weeks. Participants then crossed over after a washout period. The primary end-point was percentage time in range (TIR, 3.9-10.0 mmol/L [70-180 mg/dL]). Secondary outcomes included glycemic variability, quality of life, and outcomes on the safety system and insulin recommender. Fifty-four participants on multiple daily injections (MDI) or insulin pump completed the run-in period, making up the intention-to-treat analysis. Median (interquartile range) age was 41.5 (32.3-49.8) years, diabetes duration 21.0 (11.5-26.0) years, and HbA1c 61.0 (58.0-66.1) mmol/mol. No significant difference was observed for percentage TIR between the PEPPER and Control groups (62.5 [52.1-67.8] % vs. 58.4 [49.6-64.3] %, respectively,  = 0.27). For quality of life, participants reported higher perceived hypoglycemia with the PEPPER system despite no objective difference in time spent in hypoglycemia. The PEPPER system was safe, but did not change glycemic outcomes, compared to control. There is wide scope for integrating PEPPER into routine diabetes management for pump and MDI users. Further studies are required to confirm overall effectiveness. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03849755.

摘要

PEPPER 系统通过预测个性化决策支持为 1 型糖尿病患者提供个性化的推注建议。该系统结合了自适应胰岛素推荐系统(基于案例推理,一种人工智能方法),以及一个安全系统,包括预测性血糖警报和报警、预测性低血糖暂停、个性化碳水化合物推荐和动态推注胰岛素限制。我们评估了 PEPPER 系统与标准推注计算器相比的安全性和疗效。这是一项开放标签、多中心、随机对照交叉研究。经过 4 周的预试验后,参与者按照 1:1 的比例随机分为 PEPPER/对照或对照/PEPPER 组,进行 12 周的试验。参与者在洗脱期后交叉。主要终点是血糖控制达标时间百分比(TIR,3.9-10.0mmol/L[70-180mg/dL])。次要结局包括血糖变异性、生活质量以及安全系统和胰岛素推荐的结果。54 名接受多次皮下注射(MDI)或胰岛素泵治疗的患者完成了预试验期,纳入意向治疗分析。中位(四分位间距)年龄为 41.5(32.3-49.8)岁,糖尿病病程 21.0(11.5-26.0)年,HbA1c 61.0(58.0-66.1)mmol/mol。PEPPER 组和对照组 TIR 百分比无显著差异(分别为 62.5[52.1-67.8]%和 58.4[49.6-64.3]%, = 0.27)。对于生活质量,尽管在低血糖时间方面没有客观差异,但参与者报告使用 PEPPER 系统时感知到的低血糖发生率更高。与对照组相比,PEPPER 系统是安全的,但对血糖控制结果没有影响。对于使用胰岛素泵和 MDI 的患者,将 PEPPER 系统整合到常规糖尿病管理中具有广泛的应用前景。需要进一步的研究来证实其总体疗效。ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03849755。

相似文献

1
Safety and Feasibility of the PEPPER Adaptive Bolus Advisor and Safety System: A Randomized Control Study.PEPPER 自适应推注剂量顾问和安全系统的安全性和可行性:一项随机对照研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Mar;23(3):175-186. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0301.
2
Safety and Efficacy of an Adaptive Bolus Calculator for Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study.1 型糖尿病自适应推注计算器的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照交叉研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Jun;25(6):414-425. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0504.
3
A Modular Safety System for an Insulin Dose Recommender: A Feasibility Study.胰岛素剂量推荐器的模块化安全系统:可行性研究。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Jan;14(1):87-96. doi: 10.1177/1932296819851135. Epub 2019 May 22.
4
Effect of Automated Bolus Calculation on Glucose Variability and Quality of Life in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes on CSII Treatment.胰岛素泵强化治疗的 1 型糖尿病患者中自动推注计算对血糖变异性和生活质量的影响。
Clin Ther. 2018 Jun;40(6):862-871. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
5
Clinical Safety and Feasibility of the Advanced Bolus Calculator for Type 1 Diabetes Based on Case-Based Reasoning: A 6-Week Nonrandomized Single-Arm Pilot Study.基于案例推理的 1 型糖尿病高级推注计算器的临床安全性和可行性:一项为期 6 周的非随机单臂先导研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Aug;18(8):487-93. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0413. Epub 2016 May 19.
6
Improved Glycemic Outcomes With Medtronic MiniMed Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Delivery: Results From a Randomized Crossover Trial Comparing Automated Insulin Delivery With Predictive Low Glucose Suspend in People With Type 1 Diabetes.美敦力 MiniMed 先进混合闭环输送可改善血糖控制效果:一项比较预测性低血糖暂停的自动胰岛素输送与 1 型糖尿病患者的随机交叉试验结果。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Apr;44(4):969-975. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2250. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
7
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in children and young people at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: the SCIPI RCT.1 型糖尿病诊断时采用连续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下注射胰岛素治疗儿童和青少年:SCIPI RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(42):1-112. doi: 10.3310/hta22420.
8
Assessing the effectiveness of a 3-month day-and-night home closed-loop control combined with pump suspend feature compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy in youths and adults with suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a randomised parallel study protocol.评估3个月日夜家庭闭环控制结合泵暂停功能与传感器增强型泵疗法相比,对1型糖尿病控制不佳的青少年和成人的有效性:一项随机平行研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):e016738. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016738.
9
Meal-time glycaemia in adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injections vs insulin pump therapy following carbohydrate-counting education and bolus calculator provision.接受基于碳水化合物计数教育和推注计算器的多次胰岛素皮下注射和胰岛素泵治疗的 1 型糖尿病患者的进餐时间血糖
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Sep;179:109000. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109000. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
10
Comparison of treatment with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections with bolus calculator in patients with type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病患者持续皮下胰岛素输注与使用大剂量计算器的多次每日胰岛素注射治疗的比较。
Endocrinol Nutr. 2015 Aug-Sep;62(7):331-7. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of a decision support tool and quick start onboarding tool in individuals with type 1 diabetes using advanced automated insulin delivery: a single-arm multi-phase intervention study.使用决策支持工具和快速入门引导工具在使用先进自动化胰岛素输送的 1 型糖尿病患者中的应用:一项单臂多阶段干预研究。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12902-024-01709-y.
2
Enhancing the Capabilities of Continuous Glucose Monitoring With a Predictive App.利用预测型 APP 提升连续血糖监测能力
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep;18(5):1014-1026. doi: 10.1177/19322968241267818. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
3
Insulin Real-Time Advisor-a Decision Support Application for Insulin Therapy Coupled With the Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Impact on Glycemic Control on People With Type 1 Diabetes.
胰岛素实时顾问——一种结合持续葡萄糖监测的胰岛素治疗决策支持应用程序:对1型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep;18(5):1253-1255. doi: 10.1177/19322968241266826. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Preliminary Evidence of the Use of Generative AI in Health Care Clinical Services: Systematic Narrative Review.生成式人工智能在医疗保健临床服务中应用的初步证据:系统叙述性综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Mar 20;12:e52073. doi: 10.2196/52073.
5
Concordance of randomised controlled trials for artificial intelligence interventions with the CONSORT-AI reporting guidelines.人工智能干预随机对照试验与 CONSORT-AI 报告指南的一致性。
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 22;15(1):1619. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45355-3.
6
Applications of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Diabetes Care: Scoping Review.临床决策支持系统在糖尿病护理中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 8;25:e51024. doi: 10.2196/51024.
7
A feasibility study on the efficacy of a patient-owned wound surveillance system for diabetic foot ulcer care (ePOWS study).一项关于患者自主伤口监测系统用于糖尿病足溃疡护理疗效的可行性研究(ePOWS研究)。
Digit Health. 2023 Oct 6;9:20552076231205747. doi: 10.1177/20552076231205747. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Randomized Clinical Trials of Machine Learning Interventions in Health Care: A Systematic Review.机器学习干预在医疗保健中的随机临床试验:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233946. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33946.
9
Randomized Controlled Trials of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review.人工智能在临床实践中的随机对照试验:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 25;24(8):e37188. doi: 10.2196/37188.
10
Titration of Long-Acting Insulin Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Smart Insulin Pens in Type 1 Diabetes: A Model-Based Carbohydrate-Free Approach.1 型糖尿病中使用连续血糖监测和智能胰岛素笔进行长效胰岛素滴定:一种基于模型的无碳水化合物方法。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 10;12:795895. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.795895. eCollection 2021.