Sorrigueta-Hernández Alba, Padilla-Fernandez Barbara-Yolanda, Marquez-Sanchez Magaly-Teresa, Flores-Fraile Maria-Carmen, Flores-Fraile Javier, Moreno-Pascual Carlos, Lorenzo-Gomez Anabel, Garcia-Cenador Maria-Begoña, Lorenzo-Gomez Maria-Fernanda
Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 10;9(10):3240. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103240.
High performance female athletes may be a risk group for the development of urinary incontinence due to the imbalance of forces between the abdomen and the pelvis. Pelvic floor physiotherapy may be a useful treatment in these patients. (1) To identify the scientific evidence for pelvic floor (PF) dysfunctions that are associated with urinary incontinence (UI) in high-performance sportswomen. (2) To determine whether pelvic floor physiotherapy (PT) corrects UI in elite female athletes. Meta-analysis of published scientific evidence. The articles analyzed were found through the following search terms: (A) pelvic floor dysfunction elite female athletes; (B) urinary incontinence elite female athletes; (C) pelvic floor dysfunction elite female athletes physiotherapy; (D) urinary incontinence elite female athletes physiotherapy. type of study, number of individuals, age, prevalence of urinary incontinence described in the athletes, type of sport, type of UI, aspect investigated in the articles (prevalence, response to treatment, etiopathogenesis, response to PT treatment, concomitant health conditions or diseases. G1: low-impact (noncompetitive sports, golf, swimming, running athletics, throwing athletics); G2: moderate impact (cross-country skiing, field hockey, tennis, badminton, baseball) and G3: high impact (gymnastics, artistic gymnastics, rhythmic gymnastics, ballet, aerobics, jump sports (high, long, triple and pole jump)), judo, soccer, basketball, handball, volleyball). Descriptive analysis, ANOVA and meta-analysis. Mean age 22.69 years (SD 2.70, 18.00-29.49), with no difference between athletes and controls. Average number of athletes for each study was 284.38 (SD 373,867, 1-1263). The most frequent type of study was case-control (39.60%), followed by cross-sectional (30.20%). The type of UI was most often unspecified by the study (47.20%), was stress UI (SUI, 24.50%), or was referred to as general UI (18.90%). Studies on prevalence were more frequent (54.70%), followed by etiopathogenesis (28.30%) and, lastly, on treatment (17.00%). In most cases sportswomen did not have any disease or concomitant pathological condition (77.40%). More general UI was found in G1 (36.40%), SUI in G2 (50%) and unspecified UI in G3 (63.64%). In the meta-analysis, elite athletes were found to suffer more UI than the control women. In elite female athletes, in general, physiotherapy contributed to gain in urinary continence more than in control women (risk ratio 0.81, confidence interval 0.78-0.84)). In elite female athletes, former elite female athletes and in pregnant women who regularly engage in aerobic activity, physiotherapy was successful in delivering superior urinary continence compared to the control group. The risk of UI was the same in athletes and in the control group in volleyball female athletes, elite female athletes, cross-country skiers and runners. Treatment with PT was more effective in control women than in gymnastics, basketball, tennis, field hockey, track, swimming, volleyball, softball, golf, soccer and elite female athletes. There is pelvic floor dysfunction in high-performance athletes associated with athletic activity and urinary incontinence. Eating disorders, constipation, family history of urinary incontinence, history of urinary tract infections and decreased flexibility of the plantar arch are associated with an increased risk of UI in elite female athletes. Pelvic floor physiotherapy as a treatment for urinary incontinence in elite female athletes, former elite female athletes and pregnant athletes who engage in regular aerobic activity leads to a higher continence gain than that obtained by nonathlete women.
由于腹部和骨盆之间力量失衡,高水平女运动员可能是尿失禁发生的风险群体。盆底物理治疗可能对这些患者是一种有效的治疗方法。(1)确定与高水平女运动员尿失禁相关的盆底(PF)功能障碍的科学证据。(2)确定盆底物理治疗(PT)是否能纠正精英女运动员的尿失禁。对已发表的科学证据进行荟萃分析。通过以下检索词找到分析的文章:(A)盆底功能障碍精英女运动员;(B)尿失禁精英女运动员;(C)盆底功能障碍精英女运动员物理治疗;(D)尿失禁精英女运动员物理治疗。研究类型、个体数量、年龄、运动员中描述的尿失禁患病率、运动类型、尿失禁类型、文章中研究的方面(患病率、对治疗的反应、病因、对PT治疗的反应、伴随的健康状况或疾病)。G1组:低冲击性运动(非竞技运动、高尔夫、游泳、径赛、投掷项目);G2组:中等冲击性运动(越野滑雪、曲棍球、网球、羽毛球、棒球);G3组:高冲击性运动(体操、艺术体操、韵律体操、芭蕾舞、有氧运动、跳跃项目(跳高、跳远、三级跳远和撑杆跳))、柔道、足球、篮球、手球、排球)。描述性分析、方差分析和荟萃分析。平均年龄22.69岁(标准差2.70,18.00 - 29.49),运动员和对照组之间无差异。每项研究的运动员平均数量为284.38(标准差373,867,1 - 1263)。最常见的研究类型是病例对照研究(39.60%),其次是横断面研究(30.20%)。研究中最常未明确尿失禁类型(47.20%),为压力性尿失禁(SUI,24.50%),或称为一般性尿失禁(18.90%)。关于患病率的研究更频繁(54.70%),其次是病因(28.30%),最后是治疗(17.00%)。在大多数情况下,女运动员没有任何疾病或伴随的病理状况(77.40%)。在G1组中发现更多一般性尿失禁(36.40%),G2组中为压力性尿失禁(50%),G3组中未明确的尿失禁(63.64%)。在荟萃分析中,发现精英运动员比对照女性患尿失禁更多。总体而言,在精英女运动员中,物理治疗比对照女性更有助于改善尿失禁(风险比0.81,置信区间0.78 - 0.84)。在精英女运动员、前精英女运动员以及定期进行有氧运动的孕妇中,与对照组相比,物理治疗成功地实现了更好的尿失禁控制。排球女运动员、精英女运动员、越野滑雪者和跑步者中,运动员和对照组的尿失禁风险相同。PT治疗在对照女性中比在体操、篮球、网球、曲棍球、田径、游泳、排球、垒球、高尔夫、足球和精英女运动员中更有效。高水平运动员存在与体育活动和尿失禁相关的盆底功能障碍。饮食失调、便秘、尿失禁家族史、尿路感染史以及足底弓柔韧性降低与精英女运动员尿失禁风险增加相关。盆底物理治疗作为精英女运动员、前精英女运动员以及定期进行有氧运动的孕妇尿失禁的治疗方法,比非运动员女性能带来更高的尿失禁改善效果。