• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)鼻咽拭子检测的实用诊断准确性。

Practical Diagnostic Accuracy of Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

机构信息

Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Vituity, Department of Emergency Medicine, Wichita, Kansas.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep 28;21(6):1-4. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.8.48420.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2020.8.48420
PMID:33052811
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7673872/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of COVID-19, which has had a devastating international impact. Prior reports of testing have reported low sensitivities of nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and reports of viral co-infections have varied from 0-20%. Therefore, we sought to determine the accuracy of nasopharyngeal PCR for COVID-19 and rates of viral co-infection.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who received viral testing between March 1, 2020-April 28, 2020. Test results of a complete viral pathogen panel and COVID-19 testing were abstracted. We compared patients with more than one COVID-19 test for diagnostic accuracy against the gold standard of chart review.

RESULTS

We identified 1950 patients, of whom 1024 were tested for COVID-19. There were 221 repeat tests for COVID-19. Among patients with a repeat test, COVID-19 swabs had a sensitivity of 84.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 69.5-94.4%) and a specificity of 99.5% (95%CI, 97-100%) compared to a clinical and radiographic criterion reference by chart review. We found viral co-infection rates of 2.3% in patients without COVID-19 and 6.1% in patients with COVID-19. Rates of co-infection appeared to be related to base rates of infection in the community and not a specific property of COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 nasopharyngeal PCR specimens are accurate but have imperfect sensitivity. Repeat testing for high-risk patients should be considered, and presence of an alternative virus should not be used to limit testing for COVID-19 for patients where it would affect treatment or isolation.

摘要

简介

新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)是 COVID-19 的病原体,它对全球造成了破坏性的影响。先前的检测报告显示,鼻咽聚合酶链反应(PCR)的敏感性较低,病毒合并感染的报告率在 0-20%之间不等。因此,我们旨在确定鼻咽 PCR 检测 COVID-19 的准确性和病毒合并感染的发生率。

方法

我们对 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 4 月 28 日期间接受病毒检测的所有患者进行了回顾性病历审查。提取了完整病毒病原体组和 COVID-19 检测的检测结果。我们比较了多次 COVID-19 检测的患者,以评估其对病历审查金标准的诊断准确性。

结果

我们共纳入 1950 例患者,其中 1024 例患者接受了 COVID-19 检测。有 221 例患者重复进行了 COVID-19 检测。在重复检测的患者中,COVID-19 拭子的敏感性为 84.6%(95%置信区间(CI),69.5-94.4%),特异性为 99.5%(95%CI,97-100%),与通过病历审查的临床和影像学标准参考相比。我们发现,无 COVID-19 的患者中病毒合并感染率为 2.3%,有 COVID-19 的患者中病毒合并感染率为 6.1%。合并感染率似乎与社区感染的基础率有关,而与 COVID-19 的特定性质无关。

结论

COVID-19 鼻咽 PCR 标本准确,但敏感性不高。应考虑对高危患者进行重复检测,且不应因存在其他病毒而限制对 COVID-19 的检测,以免影响治疗或隔离。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9751/7673872/7d5519a9b47b/wjem-21-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9751/7673872/7d5519a9b47b/wjem-21-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9751/7673872/7d5519a9b47b/wjem-21-1-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Practical Diagnostic Accuracy of Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)鼻咽拭子检测的实用诊断准确性。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep 28;21(6):1-4. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.8.48420.
2
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-Based Detection Using Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens in Asymptomatic Populations.比较基于 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 的唾液或鼻咽拭子标本在无症状人群中的检测。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0006221. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00062-21. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
3
SARS-CoV-2 on Ocular Surfaces in a Cohort of Patients With COVID-19 From the Lombardy Region, Italy.意大利伦巴第地区 COVID-19 患者队列中眼表面的 SARS-CoV-2。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 1;139(9):956-963. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.5464.
4
Quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in nasopharyngeal samples from infected patients with mild disease.从轻症感染患者的鼻咽样本中定量检测 SARS-CoV-2 RNA。
J Med Virol. 2021 Apr;93(4):2439-2445. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26761. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
5
Performance of anterior nares and tongue swabs for nucleic acid, Nucleocapsid, and Spike antigen testing for detecting SARS-CoV-2 against nasopharyngeal PCR and viral culture.前鼻拭子和咽拭子在核酸、核衣壳和刺突抗原检测中的性能,以检测 SARS-CoV-2 与鼻咽 PCR 和病毒培养相比。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Apr;117:287-294. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.009. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
6
Saliva is Comparable to Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2.唾液样本与鼻咽拭子在 SARS-CoV-2 的分子检测中具有可比性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0016221. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00162-21. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
7
Performance of RT-PCR on Saliva Specimens Compared With Nasopharyngeal Swabs for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Children: A Prospective Comparative Clinical Trial.唾液标本与鼻咽拭子的 RT-PCR 检测在儿童 SARS-CoV-2 检测中的比较:一项前瞻性的临床比较试验。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021 Aug 1;40(8):e300-e304. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003198.
8
Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.临床环境中,自我采集唾液与鼻咽拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的诊断性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0046821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00468-21. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
9
Over 90% of clinical swabs used for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics contain sufficient nucleic acid concentrations.超过 90%用于 SARS-CoV-2 诊断的临床拭子含有足够的核酸浓度。
J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):2848-2856. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26706. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
10
Bean Extract-Based Gargle for Efficient Diagnosis of Active COVID-19 Infection Using Rapid Antigen Tests.基于豆提取物的含漱液可用于使用快速抗原检测高效诊断活动性 COVID-19 感染。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0161421. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01614-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards anti-racist futures: a scoping review exploring educational interventions that address systemic racism in post graduate medical education.迈向反种族主义的未来:一项范围综述,探索针对研究生医学教育中系统性种族主义的教育干预措施。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2025 Apr;30(2):359-381. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10343-1. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
2
Improving wound swab collection in paediatric patients: a quality improvement project.提高儿科患者伤口拭子采集质量:一项质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Aug;12(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002170.
3
The Impact of Anti-rheumatic Drugs on the Seroprevalence of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Cohort of Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis: The MAINSTREAM Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating the false-negative test probability of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR.估算 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 的假阴性率。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Dec;25(50). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.50.2000568.
2
Rates of Co-infection Between SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Pathogens.SARS-CoV-2 与其他呼吸道病原体的合并感染率。
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2085-2086. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6266.
3
Diagnostic Testing for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus 2: A Narrative Review.严重急性呼吸综合征相关冠状病毒 2 的诊断检测:叙述性综述。
抗风湿药物对炎症性关节炎患者队列中抗SARS-CoV-2抗体血清阳性率的影响:主流研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 11;9:850858. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.850858. eCollection 2022.
4
Case report of cardiogenic shock in COVID-19 myocarditis: peculiarities on diagnosis, histology, and treatment.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)心肌炎致心源性休克病例报告:诊断、组织学及治疗特点
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2021 Sep 9;5(10):ytab357. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab357. eCollection 2021 Oct.
5
Simple concentration method enables the use of gargle and mouthwash instead of nasopharyngeal swab sampling for the diagnosis of COVID-19 by PCR.简单的浓缩方法可使通过 PCR 诊断 COVID-19 时使用漱口液和漱口水代替鼻咽拭子采样。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;40(12):2617-2622. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04326-y. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
6
Lessons from countries implementing find, test, trace, isolation and support policies in the rapid response of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.从实施“发现、检测、追踪、隔离和支持”政策的国家吸取的经验教训:COVID-19 大流行快速反应的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 29;11(7):e047832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047832.
7
The Complexity of Co-Infections in the Era of COVID-19.COVID-19时代合并感染的复杂性
SN Compr Clin Med. 2021;3(7):1502-1514. doi: 10.1007/s42399-021-00913-4. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
8
Comparison of the simultaneous conjunctiva and oropharynx-nasopharynx swab results in patients applying to the SARS-CoV-2 outpatient clinic for the first time.首次因疑似 2019 冠状病毒疾病至门诊求诊病患,同时以结膜及鼻咽拭子进行检测之比较。
J Med Virol. 2021 Jul;93(7):4516-4522. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26981. Epub 2021 May 3.
9
Emergency Nursing Care of Patients With Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019.2019年新型冠状病毒病患者的急诊护理
J Emerg Nurs. 2020 Nov;46(6):748-759. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 2;172(11):726-734. doi: 10.7326/M20-1301. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
4
Covid-19 in Critically Ill Patients in the Seattle Region - Case Series.西雅图地区危重症新冠患者-病例系列。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2012-2022. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004500. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
5
The clinical characteristics of pneumonia patients coinfected with 2019 novel coronavirus and influenza virus in Wuhan, China.中国武汉 2019 年新型冠状病毒和流感病毒合并感染肺炎患者的临床特征。
J Med Virol. 2020 Sep;92(9):1549-1555. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25781. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
6
Co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A Virus in Patient with Pneumonia, China.中国肺炎患者同时感染 SARS-CoV-2 和甲型流感病毒。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;26(6):1324-1326. doi: 10.3201/eid2606.200299. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
7
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens.SARS-CoV-2 在不同类型临床标本中的检测。
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1843-1844. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3786.
8
Respiratory support for patients with COVID-19 infection.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)感染患者的呼吸支持
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):e18. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30110-7. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
9
Improved Molecular Diagnosis of COVID-19 by the Novel, Highly Sensitive and Specific COVID-19-RdRp/Hel Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR Assay Validated and with Clinical Specimens.新型高灵敏度和特异性 COVID-19-RdRp/Hel 实时荧光 RT-PCR 检测方法在临床标本中的验证及对 COVID-19 的分子诊断改良
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Apr 23;58(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00310-20.
10
Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR.胸部CT对新型冠状病毒肺炎的敏感性:与逆转录聚合酶链反应的比较。
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E115-E117. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200432. Epub 2020 Feb 19.