Division of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Appetite. 2021 Feb 1;157:105000. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105000. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
While there is some research examining frequency of family meals by food insecurity (FI) status, there is little research examining other family meal characteristics (e.g., type of food served at meal, emotional atmosphere) or parent feeding practices by FI status. If food and money is scarce, it may be that the broader family meal environment looks different in families with continuous access to food (food secure, FS) compared to families with FI. Using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and qualitative data, this study explores meal characteristics and parent feeding practices at nearly 4000 family meals in a low-income, racially/ethnically diverse and immigrant/refugee sample. For 8 days, participants (i.e., parents of 5-7-year-old children) completed a survey every time they shared a meal with their child. Additionally, parents completed a qualitative interview regarding family meals. There were many meal characteristics statistically correlated with a family being FI, including: who prepared the meal and how the meal was prepared, the makeup of people at the meal, the meal location and meal atmosphere, and the food served at the meal. Qualitative data illuminated many of these findings from EMA meal surveys. Quantitatively, families with FI and FS reported similar parent feeding practices during family meals. Qualitatively, families with FI and FS reported differences in (1) parent feeding practices; (2) food served at family meals; (3) challenges to having family meals; and 4) adults' role in the family meal. This study provides suggestions for interventionists working with families, including helping families identify time management strategies, including fruits and vegetables into family meals on a budget, reducing screen time at family meals while improving the meal's emotional atmosphere, and developing positive parent feeding practice strategies.
虽然有一些研究检查了家庭用餐的频率与食物不安全(FI)状况之间的关系,但很少有研究检查其他家庭用餐特征(例如,用餐时供应的食物类型、情绪氛围)或父母喂养实践与 FI 状况之间的关系。如果食物和金钱短缺,那么在能够持续获得食物(食物安全,FS)的家庭与食物不安全的家庭相比,家庭用餐环境可能会有所不同。本研究使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)和定性数据,在一个低收入、种族/族裔多样化和移民/难民样本中,对近 4000 餐家庭用餐的特点和父母喂养实践进行了探索。在 8 天的时间里,参与者(即 5-7 岁儿童的父母)每次与孩子一起用餐时都会完成一项调查。此外,父母还完成了一项关于家庭用餐的定性访谈。有许多用餐特点与家庭 FI 状况存在统计学上的相关性,包括:谁准备了饭菜以及如何准备饭菜、用餐人员构成、用餐地点和用餐氛围以及用餐时供应的食物。定量数据通过 EMA 膳食调查阐明了这些发现中的许多内容。定量数据表明,有 FI 和 FS 的家庭在家庭用餐期间报告了类似的父母喂养实践。定性数据表明,有 FI 和 FS 的家庭在以下方面存在差异:(1)父母喂养实践;(2)家庭用餐时供应的食物;(3)家庭用餐的挑战;以及 4)成年人在家庭用餐中的角色。本研究为与家庭合作的干预者提供了建议,包括帮助家庭在预算内识别时间管理策略,包括在家庭用餐中纳入水果和蔬菜,减少家庭用餐时的屏幕时间,同时改善用餐的情绪氛围,并制定积极的父母喂养实践策略。