The Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, GU24 0NF, UK.
University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4071, Australia.
J Gen Virol. 2021 Jan;102(1). doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001506. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
Although enveloped viruses canonically mediate particle entry through virus-cell fusion, certain viruses can spread by cell-cell fusion, brought about by receptor engagement and triggering of membrane-bound, viral-encoded fusion proteins on the surface of cells. The formation of pathogenic syncytia or multinucleated cells is seen , but their contribution to viral pathogenesis is poorly understood. For the negative-strand paramyxoviruses respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and Nipah virus (NiV), cell-cell spread is highly efficient because their oligomeric fusion protein complexes are active at neutral pH. The recently emerged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has also been reported to induce syncytia formation in infected cells, with the spike protein initiating cell-cell fusion. Whilst it is well established that fusion protein-specific antibodies can block particle attachment and/or entry into the cell (canonical virus neutralization), their capacity to inhibit cell-cell fusion and the consequences of this neutralization for the control of infection are not well characterized, in part because of the lack of specific tools to assay and quantify this activity. Using an adapted bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay, based on a split GFP luciferase reporter, we have established a micro-fusion inhibition test (mFIT) that allows the identification and quantification of these neutralizing antibodies. This assay has been optimized for high-throughput use and its applicability has been demonstrated by screening monoclonal antibody (mAb)-mediated inhibition of RSV and NiV fusion and, separately, the development of fusion-inhibitory antibodies following NiV vaccine immunization in pigs. In light of the recent emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a similar assay was developed for SARS-CoV-2 and used to screen mAbs and convalescent patient plasma for fusion-inhibitory antibodies. Using mFITs to assess antibody responses following natural infection or vaccination is favourable, as this assay can be performed entirely at low biocontainment, without the need for live virus. In addition, the repertoire of antibodies that inhibit cell-cell fusion may be different to those that inhibit particle entry, shedding light on the mechanisms underpinning antibody-mediated neutralization of viral spread.
虽然包膜病毒通常通过病毒-细胞融合介导粒子进入,但某些病毒可以通过细胞-细胞融合传播,这是由受体结合和触发细胞表面膜结合的、病毒编码的融合蛋白引起的。可以看到致病性合胞体或多核细胞的形成,但它们对病毒发病机制的贡献尚不清楚。对于负链副粘病毒呼吸道合胞病毒 (RSV) 和尼帕病毒 (NiV),细胞-细胞传播非常有效,因为它们的寡聚融合蛋白复合物在中性 pH 值下具有活性。最近出现的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 也被报道在感染细胞中诱导合胞体形成,其刺突蛋白引发细胞-细胞融合。虽然已经证实融合蛋白特异性抗体可以阻断粒子附着和/或进入细胞(经典的病毒中和),但它们抑制细胞-细胞融合的能力及其对感染控制的中和作用的后果尚未得到很好的描述,部分原因是缺乏用于检测和量化这种活性的特定工具。我们使用基于 GFP 荧光素酶报告基因的双分子荧光互补测定法 (Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation Assay, BiFC) 建立了一种微融合抑制试验 (Micro-Fusion Inhibition Test, mFIT),该试验可用于鉴定和定量这些中和抗体。该测定法已针对高通量使用进行了优化,并通过筛选单克隆抗体 (Monoclonal Antibody, mAb) 介导的 RSV 和 NiV 融合抑制作用以及 NiV 疫苗免疫接种后在猪中产生的融合抑制性抗体,证明了其适用性。鉴于最近出现的 2019 年冠状病毒病 (COVID-19),我们针对 SARS-CoV-2 开发了类似的测定法,并用于筛选 mAb 和康复期患者血浆中的融合抑制性抗体。使用 mFIT 评估自然感染或接种疫苗后的抗体反应是有利的,因为该测定法可以完全在低生物安全水平下进行,而无需使用活病毒。此外,抑制细胞-细胞融合的抗体谱可能与抑制粒子进入的抗体谱不同,这为阐明抗体介导的病毒传播中和的机制提供了线索。