From the Departments of Neurology (M.A.B., K.Y.), Psychiatry (A.B., W.D.B., K.Y.), and Epidemiology (K.Y.), University of California, San Francisco; and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center (K.Y.), CA.
Neurology. 2020 Dec 15;95(24):e3280-e3287. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010951. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
To evaluate the association between baseline apathy and probable incident dementia in a population-based sample of community-dwelling older adults.
We studied 2,018 white and black community-dwelling older adults from the Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) study. We measured apathy at year 6 (our study baseline) with the modified Apathy Evaluation Scale and divided participants into tertiles based on low, moderate, or severe apathy symptoms. Incident dementia was ascertained over 9 years by dementia medication use, hospital records, or clinically relevant cognitive decline on global cognition. We examined the association between apathy and probable incident dementia using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, status, and depressed mood. We also evaluated the association between the apathy group and cognitive change (as measured by the modified Mini-Mental State Examination and Digit Symbol Substitution Test over 5 years) using linear mixed effects models.
Over 9 years of follow-up, 381 participants developed probable dementia. Severe apathy was associated with an increased risk of dementia compared to low apathy (25% vs 14%) in unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-2.5) and adjusted models (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.2). Greater apathy was associated with worse cognitive score at baseline, but not rate of change over time.
In a diverse cohort of community-dwelling adults, apathy was associated with increased risk of developing probable dementia. This study provides novel evidence for apathy as a prodrome of dementia.
在一个基于社区的居住老年人样本中,评估基线淡漠与可能发生的痴呆之间的关联。
我们研究了来自健康、衰老和身体成分(Health ABC)研究的 2018 名白人和黑人社区居住的老年人。我们在第 6 年(我们的研究基线)使用改良淡漠评估量表来衡量淡漠,并根据淡漠症状的严重程度将参与者分为低、中或高三组。通过痴呆症药物使用、医院记录或全球认知能力相关的认知能力下降来确定 9 年内的痴呆症发病情况。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型调整人口统计学、心血管危险因素、 状况和抑郁情绪,来评估淡漠与可能发生的痴呆症之间的关联。我们还使用线性混合效应模型评估淡漠组与认知变化(通过 5 年的改良 Mini-Mental State Examination 和数字符号替代测试来衡量)之间的关联。
在 9 年的随访期间,381 名参与者患上了可能的痴呆症。与低淡漠相比,严重淡漠与痴呆风险增加相关(未调整的危险比 [HR] 1.9,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.5-2.5 和调整后的模型 [HR 1.7,95%CI 1.3-2.2])。淡漠程度越高,基线时的认知评分越差,但与随时间变化的变化率无关。
在一个多样化的社区居住成年人队列中,淡漠与发展为可能的痴呆症的风险增加相关。这项研究为淡漠作为痴呆症的前驱症状提供了新的证据。