Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素受体阻滞剂产品召回对德国抗高血压药物处方的影响。

Impact of angiotensin receptor blocker product recalls on antihypertensive prescribing in Germany.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

German Institute for Drug Use Evaluation, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 2021 Oct;35(10):903-911. doi: 10.1038/s41371-020-00425-z. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

Abstract

In Germany, ~8 million patients take angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and 2.25 million of them valsartan. In 2018, contamination of generic ARBs with probable carcinogenic nitrosamines resulted in more than 30 recalls. The impact of such a huge recall has never been explored in Europe. We analyzed the utilization of valsartan, all ARBs, and other alternative antihypertensive drugs in Germany. We used our database of anonymized dispensing data from >80% of community pharmacies at the expense of the statutory health insurance (SHI) funds from January 2017 to December 2019. We analyzed 290.8 million prescriptions, including all oral mono- and fixed-dose combinations of ARBs and plausible alternatives, i.e. ACE inhibitors (ACEi), beta-blockers (BB), and calcium channel blockers (CCB). Utilization was calculated by defined daily doses per 1000 SHI-insured persons per day (DID). Valsartan use decreased substantially after the recalls in July 2018 from 39.0 to 14.2 DID (-64%) in the second quarter of 2019 and to 16.9 DID (-57%) in the fourth quarter of 2019. Simultaneously, the use of alternative ARBs increased from 77.7 DID in the second quarter of 2018 to 121.9 DID (+57%) in the fourth quarter of 2019, mainly due to an increase of candesartan dispensing to 99.8 DID (+73%). There were no changes in the utilization of ACEi, BB, or CCB. The majority of recalled generic valsartan products were replaced by other ARBs, predominantly candesartan, despite documented drug shortages. In contrast to previous safety warnings/recalls, our data do not suggest an under-prescription of antihypertensives during this period.

摘要

在德国,约有 800 万名患者服用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs),其中 225 万人服用缬沙坦。2018 年,由于仿制药 ARBs 受到可能致癌的亚硝胺污染,导致 30 多次召回。这种大规模召回在欧洲从未被研究过。我们分析了德国缬沙坦、所有 ARBs 和其他降压替代药物的使用情况。我们使用了我们的数据库,该数据库包含了 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间 80%以上社区药店的匿名配药数据,这些数据是由法定健康保险(SHI)基金支付的。我们分析了 2.908 亿张处方,包括 ARBs 的所有口服单药和固定剂量组合,以及合理的替代药物,即血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)、β-受体阻滞剂(BB)和钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)。利用情况是通过每 1000 名 SHI 参保人每天的定义日剂量(DID)计算的。在 2018 年 7 月召回事件后,缬沙坦的使用量大幅下降,从 2019 年第二季度的 39.0DID 降至 14.2DID(下降 64%),第四季度降至 16.9DID(下降 57%)。与此同时,替代 ARBs 的使用量从 2018 年第二季度的 77.7DID 增加到 2019 年第四季度的 121.9DID(增加 57%),主要是由于坎地沙坦的配药量增加到 99.8DID(增加 73%)。ACEi、BB 或 CCB 的使用量没有变化。尽管存在药物短缺问题,但大多数召回的缬沙坦仿制药产品都被其他 ARBs 替代,主要是坎地沙坦。与之前的安全警告/召回事件不同,我们的数据在此期间并没有表明降压药物的处方减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f75/8502678/c806890b0b6e/41371_2020_425_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验