Hematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Division of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Br J Haematol. 2021 Apr;193(2):316-324. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17145. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
We describe the opportunistic infections occurring in 362 patients with lymphoproliferative disorders treated with ibrutinib and idelalisib in clinical practice. Overall, 108 of 362 patients (29·8%) developed infections, for a total of 152 events. Clinically defined infections (CDI) were 49·3% (75/152) and microbiologically defined infections (MDI) were 50·7% (77/152). Among 250 patients treated with ibrutinib, 28·8% (72/250) experienced one or more infections, for a total of 104 episodes. MDI were 49% (51/104). Bacterial infections were 66·7% (34/51), viral 19·6% (10/51) and invasive fungal diseases (IFD) 13·7% (7/51). Among the 112 patients treated with idelalisib, 32·1% (36/112) experienced one or more infections, for a total of 48 episodes. MDI were 54·2% (26/48). Bacterial infections were 34·6% (9/26), viral 61·5% (16/26) and IFD 3·8% (1/26). With ibrutinib, the rate of bacterial infections was significantly higher compared to idelalisib (66·7% vs. 34·6%; P = 0·007), while viral infections were most frequent in idelalisib (61·5% vs. 19·6%; P < 0·001). Although a higher rate of IFD was observed in patients treated with ibrutinib, the difference was not statistically significant (13·7% vs. 3·8% respectively; P = 0·18). Bacteria are the most frequent infections with ibrutinib, while viruses are most frequently involved with idelalisib.
我们描述了在临床实践中,362 例接受伊布替尼和idelalisib 治疗的淋巴增殖性疾病患者发生的机会性感染。总体而言,362 例患者中有 108 例(29.8%)发生感染,共 152 例。临床定义的感染(CDI)占 49.3%(75/152),微生物定义的感染(MDI)占 50.7%(77/152)。在 250 例接受伊布替尼治疗的患者中,28.8%(72/250)发生了一次或多次感染,共 104 例。MDI 占 49%(51/104)。细菌感染占 66.7%(34/51),病毒感染占 19.6%(10/51),侵袭性真菌病(IFD)占 13.7%(7/51)。在 112 例接受idelalisib 治疗的患者中,32.1%(36/112)发生了一次或多次感染,共 48 例。MDI 占 54.2%(26/48)。细菌感染占 34.6%(9/26),病毒感染占 61.5%(16/26),IFD 占 3.8%(1/26)。与伊布替尼相比,细菌感染的发生率明显更高(66.7% vs. 34.6%;P = 0.007),而病毒感染在idelalisib 中更为常见(61.5% vs. 19.6%;P < 0.001)。尽管接受伊布替尼治疗的患者中观察到较高的 IFD 发生率,但差异无统计学意义(分别为 13.7%和 3.8%;P = 0.18)。伊布替尼最常见的感染是细菌感染,而idelalisib 最常见的感染是病毒感染。