Research Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Degree Programme in Dental Hygienist, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Eur J Dent Educ. 2021 May;25(2):385-396. doi: 10.1111/eje.12615. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
The aim of this study was to evaluate dentists', dental hygienists' and dental assistants' competence in mentoring students and to identify distinct mentor profiles.
The study employed a cross-sectional design. Data were collected using the Mentors' Competence Instrument (MCI), which includes 45 items structured under seven mentoring competence sub-dimensions. The data were collected during autumn 2017 from dentists, dental hygienists and dental assistants working in the Finnish primary healthcare (n = 1097) using a paper survey, whilst dentists (n = 26) who have completed mentoring education in one university completed an electronic questionnaire. Cases with more than 5% missing data (n = 164) were listwise deleted, whilst the remaining data (n = 933) underwent analysis. K-mean clustering was used to identify significantly different mentor profiles, whilst comparisons of mentoring competence between the identified profiles were performed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests.
Three distinct mentor profiles (A, B and C) that differed in the level of mentoring competence were identified. The participants in profile A encompassed mostly dental assistants, profile B included mostly dental assistants and dentists, and profile C mainly comprised dentists and dental assistants. Profiles A, B and C differed significantly in terms of education, job title, role of mentor and participation in mentoring education. The largest difference in competence was observed between participants of profiles A and C. Each profile differed significantly from the other two across all seven competence areas. Most of the participants had not previously received any mentoring education.
There is room for improvement in the competence of dentistry student mentors, especially regarding knowledge of effective mentoring practices, goal-oriented mentoring, mentor characteristics and motivation for mentoring. Every mentor that works with oral healthcare students should receive mentoring training.
本研究旨在评估牙医、口腔卫生师和口腔助理在指导学生方面的能力,并确定不同的导师特征。
本研究采用横断面设计。数据收集使用导师能力量表(MCI),该量表包括 45 个项目,分为 7 个导师能力子维度。2017 年秋季,通过纸质问卷从在芬兰初级保健机构工作的牙医、口腔卫生师和口腔助理(n=1097)中收集数据,同时,在一所大学完成导师教育的 26 名牙医(n=26)完成了电子问卷。对于缺失数据超过 5%的案例(n=164)进行了全样本删除,其余数据(n=933)进行了分析。采用 K-均值聚类法识别出具有显著差异的导师特征,同时使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney 检验比较所识别特征之间的导师能力。
共确定了三个具有不同指导能力水平的导师特征(A、B 和 C)。特征 A 的参与者主要是口腔助理,特征 B 包括主要是口腔助理和牙医,特征 C 主要由牙医和口腔助理组成。在教育程度、职称、导师角色和参与导师教育方面,A、B 和 C 三个特征存在显著差异。在能力方面,参与者 A 和 C 之间的差异最大。每个特征在所有七个能力领域与其他两个特征均存在显著差异。大多数参与者之前没有接受过任何导师教育。
在口腔健康专业学生导师的能力方面仍有改进空间,尤其是在有效指导实践、目标导向指导、导师特征和指导动机方面。每一位与口腔卫生学生合作的导师都应该接受指导培训。